








 |
L I F E A N D W O R K
The Work-Life
Balance
Globalisation, competition, and ambition
are driving corporate India to work, work, and only work. And what about
life? Sorry, there's no time.
By Seema
Shukla
There's no time
there's just no time...
Even to spend some time
there's just no time...
You never
really know how and when it happens. The day there's no real need for a
morning alarm, because you're already up. When you start talking to
yourself while being driven to work, a blur of early morning flights, late
night meetings, networking dinners, and cups and cups of coffee. At home,
there's always a laptop to carry on working, the mobile phone blinking
like a pace-setter. Slowly, everything creeps under your skin, and spreads
itself out at the workplace, the shopping malls, the schools, the
restaurants, the roads. Funny isn't it, that it finally all boils down to
two simple questions: do you enjoy being at work more than being at home?
Do you have a life outside work?
Around a decade-and-a-half ago, when
government called the shots and corporate India's senior managers hid
behind nicknames earned in public schools, work was work-and life was
life. The guys who really goofed off went to the tea gardens; everyone
else worked hard enough to ensure and perpetuate a system of privileges,
which is fortunately on the wane today-at least in corporate India.
Post-liberalisation, the textures have changed completely thanks to
competition and globalisation. All around, too many people are working
really, really hard. Too few have the time to answer the questions. Too
much work; what life? No balance.
The concept of a healthy balance between
work and life is not some candy-coated hr pill to overworked and stressed
employees. It is a symbol, and not a sexy one, of the times we are living
in. The drivers are fairly obvious. Jobs have become more demanding as
organisations become leaner and the business environment more competitive.
Then, there are more women, single parents, and families where both
parents work in today's workforce than in the past. Finally, and
significantly, there is an increasing emphasis on leisure activities. Put
all three together and the work-life issues become all too clear.
The Company Wo(man)
While the
drivers are clear, who's doing the driving? Is it the individuals or the
companies? Let's say a bit of both. For companies, the obvious realisation
is that work and personal life are interdependent, and employees' personal
issues can impact job performance. Companies realise that it is an
important issue if they are to attract, retain, and get the best out of
their employees. By tackling work-life balance head-first, companies can
reduce employee burnout and enhance productivity. Says Y.V. Verma,
Vice-President (HR&MS), LG Electronics India Ltd: ''In the future,
companies will have to take care of employees' mental and physical
well-being to ensure 100 per cent dedication to the organisation.
Employers can do this through little gestures that are usually ignored.''
A report at the Davos World Economic Forum,
1999, put it succinctly: ''CEOs are increasingly suffering from stress,
sleep deprivation, heart disease, loneliness, failed marriages, and
depression, among other problems. And those woes are taking a toll on the
bottomline-CEOs must avoid workaholism. No matter how much they enjoy
their jobs, they must avoid overworking when it renders their home life so
unpleasant that the office becomes happier than the home.''
At the same time, do what they may to put
weight on the 'life' side of the scales, there is no lightening up
happening on the work side. It is a more competitive, global marketplace
that employees find themselves in. Anything less than a 100 per cent
performance is just not acceptable. And that means more pressure on
employees. Explains Sanjiv Sachar of Egon Zehnder: ''It is a very
competitive environment today. Not only are companies putting pressures to
perform, but individuals are also very ambitious. Combined, it is creating
more pressures at work.''
Technology, while often aiding efficiency,
has been increasing work loads by making people accessible around the
clock. Mobile phones and laptops aren't helping matters, says Narayan
Seshadri, head of business consulting, Arthur Andersen: ''One would think
things would ease up with the use of computers. But work has now become
more intrusive rather than moving towards a balance.'' At present,
Seshadri is developing Arthur Andersen's business consulting division. He
works 12-14 hours a day, six-and-a-half days a week. Of these, three days
a week are spent travelling. One thing he is sure of is that life can't
continue at such a hectic pace forever. ''This is just till things become
more stable.''
Globalisation is adding fuel to this
imbalance. Employees have no choice but to sit and work late if they have
to co-ordinate with a market that is 10 hours behind. Explains Sanjay
Rishi, country manager, American Express Travel Related Services: ''Being
a global organisation, we have to have a lot of flexibility in timings.
For example, Hong Kong, where the head of the cards division sits, is
two-and-a-half hours ahead of us, while the marketing head is in London.
If you have a video conference where all three of us are needed, it has to
be at an odd hour.''
Almost simultaneously, work-life balance is
something employees are increasingly demanding. A Gemini Consulting survey
of workers in 13 industrialised countries found that a desire for a decent
balance between work and life was rated more highly than a good salary
everywhere but in Russia (don't ask me why). These extremes are nowhere
near prevalent in India, but they are on the radar of employees. Says R.
Suresh, Stanton Chase: ''It is an issue candidates are taking more
seriously when changing jobs, but not on the top of the priority list as
yet.''
But there's no denying that employees
seeking to balance sufficient earnings with family time are stretched. For
the time and flexibility to be around when the maid does not show. To
attend the PTA, kid's Christmas play or the doctor's appointment for an
ageing parent. And it doesn't look rosier in the future. In the good old
days, there were general standards to be met to ensure a time-based
promotion. Even if performance wasn't up to the mark, a gentle designation
and salary hike was somewhere on the horizon. But that is not the case
today. Perform or perish is the new paradigm.
|
The
Changing Equations |
| |
The
Machine Age |
The
Industrial Age |
The
Networked Age |
| Stress |
High
|
Higher
|
Highest
|
| Work-Life
balance |
You went to
work-life started only when you go home
|
Not
only are you working at work, but also at home |
24-hour
workdays split into compartments dedicated for 'life' |
| Women
and Work |
The men worked
and women tended the house
|
Both
men and women worked, and women still tended the house |
Both
men and women work and tend to the house |
| Help
Lines |
None
|
Baby-sitters,
creches, old-age homes, maids-help that comes with its own
problems |
Hands-free
executive aid firms that manage your laundry and the kids'
homework |
|
The Company As The Provider
Tomorrow
(for it is not today), you can safely expect most companies to accord a
high priority to work-life issues. A beginning has been made by a few
companies. Take, for instance, companies like Hughes Software, GE, and
Hewlett-Packard making an arrangement with a third-party concierge
services company to help employees in chore management. Or, the fact that
more and more companies are tying up with banks to set up an ATM facility
in the premises-something that can be found, for instance, in the Sony
India head office in Delhi.
Then, there are the 'considerate' touches.
Take the case of HCL Comnet: every time it sends one of its employees
abroad for work, it distributes free telephone coupons to the family
members, thereby helping them keep in touch. In other cases, companies are
increasing emphasis on personal learning and development. At Ericsson, for
instance, an employee from the Indian office was recently sent on a 100
per cent company-funded two-year sabbatical to the US. Late last month,
Ericsson also held a leadership training programme in the Kumaon Hills.
Another instance: The Chinmaya Mission spoke on the 'Art of Living and
Motivation' to Ericsson employees.
The softer events are driven around the
company organising leisure for its employees. The idea is hardly a new one
(office picnics span various work ages, and will continue to do so,
unfortunately), but has been given a makeover in order to promote the idea
of having fun. So, mirroring many other companies, Ericsson has initiated
the concept of an evening at a pub once a month. Polaris Software takes
this one step further with its 'Bonzertm' programme, where, among other
things, seniors and juniors alike dunk their heads into tubs full of water
trying to grab floating apples with their teeth, hands tied behind their
backs! Says Govind Singhal, Senior Vice-President (hr), of Polaris: ''The
logic behind conducting such sessions month after month at the workplace
is to have fun and to enable people to get closer to each other. Happy
people work better together.''
More and more companies are spending
thought and time on the idea of adopting the role of a leisure provider.
Explains Nalin Miglani, head of hr, Coke: ''This is an issue full of
potential and one that is still under-developed. From the concept of a
'leave' policy, organisations will have to move towards a 'leisure'
policy. The direction will be to move from simply providing a few days off
to making the concept of leisure work. Leisure linked to performance may
not be entirely improbable.'' Research into the 'leisure' needs of
employees and devising means to provide them in a non-intrusive way would
be a key hr challenge. And that is something Coca-Cola in India is looking
at-although it does not have an advanced leisure management program yet.
The Individual As The Seeker
Work-life
balance is, to a large extent, an individual issue as well. There is only
a certain amount a company can do to help-after that it is up to the
individual to balance his life. Take the case of Siddharth Varma, CEO,
Reebok India, who works from 9:15 am to 8 pm five days a week. Though
Reebok India follows a five-day week, Varma ends up working a half-day on
Saturday, a day he reserves for visiting the markets, customers and
franchisees, as well as catching up with senior managers. He spends the
rest of his day and all of Sunday with his family.
Varma is clear about one thing: he doesn't
travel or work during the weekend and travels once every fortnight for
about two days. He never carries his work home and does not even take
office phone calls at home. Says he, ''I feel that in future, more and
more companies and employers will start respecting their employees'
individual space. People will also learn to create a clear distinction
between personal and private time. They will also understand that business
must be transacted during business hours and not beyond that.''
Or let's meet Sunil Lulla, the CEO of
Indya.com. Despite the fact that he is part of the 24X7 internet culture
in a start-up situation, Lulla makes sure he finds time for himself. As he
says, ''I make it a point to sleep seven hours every night. I stay fit,
play sports, I workout, I try to maintain a constant weight throughout the
year. I read whenever I get time. You can't do all this all the time. On
Sundays, I try to spend time with my family. Time management is very
crucial.''
Indeed. In the future, it will be up to
individuals to insist on certain measures needed to be taken for a smooth
life. Explains Atul Vohra, Partner, Heidrick & Struggles: ''People
have to learn to concentrate on the present. When they are at home, they
need to stop thinking of work and vice-versa. You have to
compartmentalise.'' Vohra compares it to Napoleon's analogy of how he used
to manage life like a chest of drawers-opening only one drawer at a time.
This is where companies can help with training. Vohra suggests that
personal life be treated as a separate KRA or key result area, where the
individual needs to perform.
But a work-life balance initiative is not
all about doing things that give the employee more time for work. That is,
by far, the aim. Yet, when companies start moving towards such a
programme, they often get stuck in this trap. Many workers are questioning
work-life programmes, especially in the US where they have been around for
a longer time. The contention: thanks for putting in programmes for
work-life balance, but no thanks for helping me work longer. What is being
ignored is the issue of an increasing workload. Until that issue is
addressed, these part-measures are not of much consequence. The full
solution can be met only when workers and management put their heads
together.
Women employees get a raw deal in work-life
balance. Managing the pressures of demanding workplaces, as well as family
time usually falls on women. US data is clear: the time married women with
children spend working outside the home has nearly doubled in 30 years. In
fact, the sandwich generation cares for their children and ageing parents
at the same time. Women bear the brunt. Companies are becoming more
sensitive to the issue. Take the case of HLL; it allocates houses nearer
the office to women employees with children, has in some cases allowed
women to work from home, and is looking at the possibility of starting a
creche in the office. Although there are no formal policies laid down,
informally each case is considered and dealt with at the individual level.
Often, part-timing or flexi-timing is put
forward as a solution-for both women; and men who will increasingly share
the challenge of managing family and work time. A solution that helps
individuals who want to work at a pace decided by them. At the same time,
this helps companies save money by reduced fixed employee costs. MIT's
Sloan Conference, among others, predicts that the 21st century will
quickly usher in the e-lance economy where independent contractors
belonging to teams of electronically-connected professionals working in a
fluid, temporary network will produce and sell goods and services. Once a
particular job is done-in a day, a month, or a year-the network will
dissolve and the contractors will seek out new assignments.
But whether these new forms of work are
adapted depend on how open employers are to such arrangements. And, more
importantly, how responsible employees are in getting the work done in the
new set up. Such arrangements are, ideally, mutually beneficial. They help
employers lower costs and employee-overheads. As for employees, it helps
them juggle family life and work at their own pace. But it does not always
work out well. In the future, we should see more formal systems to
regulate work done on a part-time basis. Even if most companies are not
comfortable with the idea at the moment, this is an issue that will emerge
in the near future. At Arthur Andersen for instance, they have already
started experimenting with the idea. Employees are increasingly being
given isdn connections at home, but the response from the employees has
not been enthusiastic. Says Seshadri: ''We find most employees are not
comfortable working from home. They need the discipline and environment of
a workplace.'' According to Reebok's Varma, it will take time before
companies and individuals get used to the concept: ''I don't see working
from home happening just yet. Maybe sometime in the future.''
Working Hard And Working Smart
There is
growing evidence that 'working hard' does not mean 'working long'. Take
the US: the percentage of professionals working 49 hours or more a week
has begun to fall to 27.9 per cent. The implication is obvious: using time
more effectively to reach one's work targets will become the order of the
day. From the companies' point of view, as performance pressures increase,
there will be an increasing demand for professionals who can fit the bill.
The market after all will seek high-performing individuals. In this
seemingly no-win situation, it is up to individuals to find the balance
between work and leisure.
Particularly as, although the work-life
movement is picking up pace in India, there's a lot of ground to be
covered. For every forward-oriented company offering flexible and
innovative solutions to its employees, there are many more looking at
'drag co-efficients'. The logic: just like an object that moves faster and
is aerodynamically superior if it has a smooth surface and less
appendages, employees will be more productive if they have less drag
around them. A single male, living away from his family and able to devote
himself to work completely is preferred to a woman with two children. With
conflicts and challenges emerging at a furious pace, will it get any
better? The answer, in many ways, lies deep within you.
|