EDUCATION
Failing the TestJoshi's Hindutva agenda on education backfires on the Government. In the
process, serious measures to reform the sector also fall by the wayside.
By Harinder
Baweja
He showed saffron and they saw red. Make
Sanskrit compulsory, Minister for Human Resource Development Murli Manohar Joshi proposed.
No way, the non-BJP ministers disposed. Make school children imbibe the Vedas and
Upanishads, Joshi pleaded. No chance, the Opposition retorted.
The two-day conference of state education ministers
snowballed into a political controversy even before it could begin on October 22. In a
blatant move at what even the BJP's allies termed an attempt at foisting the
"Hindutva agenda", the ministry clubbed the conference agenda and a set of
annexures which they said were recommendations of an unnamed "group of experts".
That's where the controversy took root. The recommendations
were no more than a set of proposals conceived by stalwarts of the Vidya Bharati, an
educational arm of the RSS. In yet another instance of the Sangh parivar trying to
influence government policy, Joshi even went to the extent of inviting a Calcutta-based
industrialist and BJP supporter, P.D. Chitlangia, to make a presentation on low-cost
education. "He is the only person in the country who is running 1,300 schools in
tribal areas," said Joshi trying to brush away the criticism that Chitlangia was the
only participant who was not an education minister.
CONTENTIOUS
PLANS |
| Establish an autonomous mission for
educational reforms and council for elementary education at Central, state and district
levels Decentralise planning. Autonomy for
school boards.
Curricula be "Indianised and spiritualised". Teach
Indian philosophy, including Vedas and Upanishads in higher education. Sanskrit be made
compulsory from Class III to X.
Accountability at all levels. Decennial evaluation of
teachers by National Academy of Teachers.
Selective access to higher education; make it more
vocational. Set up national education service.
Extend provision of Article 30 giving special minority rights
in education to all citizens.
Replace marking in examinations with grading system. |
Joshi tried to take the sting out of the controversy by
starting the conference with the national anthem and then moving on to the Saraswati
Vandana -- an invocation to the goddess of learning. Similarly, Chitlangia who was
initially described as representing Vidya Bharati was, through a modified programme
itinerary, introduced as being from the Friends of Tribal Society. "I have nothing to
do with Vidya Bharati and RSS. I have friends in all political parties," he said.
No one heard him. Vigyan Bhawan, the venue of the conference,
witnessed scenes reminiscent of Parliament. The proceedings were disrupted by indignant
state education ministers. They even staged a walk-out before Prime Minister Atal Bihari
Vajpayee could begin his inaugural speech.
The stormy conference, in fact, only added to the list of
embarrassing controversies that have dogged the Government. Vajpayee tried to settle the
issue by asking Joshi to publicly recommit himself to the National Agenda for Governance,
but state ministers drawn even from the coalition partners like the Akali Dal walked out.
Said Manjit Singh Calcutta, the Punjab education minister, "We are not here to
discuss the RSS agenda. We will never accept Sanskrit. Punjabi has not been made the
second language either in Delhi or Haryana."
The agenda was visible through the proposals in the annexure.
Under curriculum, for instance, there was a proposal that education from the primary
classes should be "Indianised, nationalised and spiritualised". Taking serious
objection to this, Congress President Sonia Gandhi wrote a three-page letter to Vajpayee
pointing out that the word "secularism" had not even been considered worthy of
mention. "What does this mean? Is it implied that curricula hitherto have been
un-Indian or anti-Indian, that curricula have been colonial or foreign, not related to the
past or present realities of India?" she asked.
Like the Governor's report from Bihar recommending
President's rule -- where the BJP state unit's charge-sheet was garnished with legalese
and submitted to Rashtrapati Bhavan -- the annexures presented at the conference were said
to bear an uncanny resemblance to a Vidya Bharati report. Again, the Government was caught
on the wrong foot and pitted against an opposition where the Congress and the Left spoke
in the same voice. And again, it was the Government which was forced to retrace its steps.
The conference resumed only after Joshi announced that the annexures were being withdrawn
and Chitlangia's presentation cancelled.
In a sense, Joshi had no alternative since the protestors
were unwilling to go ahead with proposals that also included a change in Articles 29 and
30 of the Constitution relating to special minority rights. The suggestion was to extend
the right to establish and administer educational institutes to "every section of
citizens", not just minorities. It was a demand that had its origins in the
Ramakrishna Mission's battles against the Left Front Government in West Bengal. With the
BJP in power at the Centre, it is high on the Vidya Bharati agenda. Says its General
Secretary Dina Nath Batra: "If the minorities have the right to administer schools,
why can't we? We Hindus are a majority." A demand that raised the hackles of the
Opposition. West Bengal Minister for Higher Education S.S. Chakraborty added to the
controversy saying, "Religion should not be mixed with education."
In the political and religious overtones that finally marked
the conference, some of the sensible proposals took a beating. For example, the
establishment of a National Academy of Teachers to assess teachers every 10 years.
Likewise, the suggestion to make education autonomous from the Government was perceived as
a cover for a quiet takeover. In trying to smuggle through some of the pet concerns of the
RSS, Joshi ended up putting his whole ministry under political scrutiny. For six months,
he had unobtrusively effected substantial changes in the management of educational
institutions run by the Centre, replacing Leftists and Congress groupies with their
saffron counterparts. Now he will find his unfinished agenda a trifle more difficult to
accomplish. Having abandoned caution for ideological bravado, Joshi has not merely lost a
battle. He has converted a skirmish into a war. |