





|
KARNATAKA
Cast AdriftTardy rehabilitation
efforts compounds the trauma of villagers displaced by a Naval base construction project.
By Stephen
David
 |
"With 15 families dependent on fishing
where can we go with just Rs 50,000?"
Dunga Kumarsa Tandel
Evacuee from Chendia village |
Meenakshi Umakant is a refugee in her own land. This
indignity was heaped upon the 27-year-old villager from Aligadda near Karwar town in north
Karnataka when the district authorities demolished her house. Hundreds of other villagers
who shared her fate are not victims of war or natural disasters. They are the hapless
casualties of a Ministry of Defence (mod) project to construct a major naval base at the
picturesque site on the Konkan coast . The Karnataka Government has shifted nearly 300
families and would, by the end of June, clear all the 13 villages that fall within the
8,320 acres of land required by the naval project.
 |
"We are refugees in
our own land. We would be happy if we are given some means of ekeing out a living."
Meenakshi Umakant
Displaced resident of Aligadda village |
The misery of the displaced villagers is compounded by
the inadequate rehabilitation efforts of the Karnataka Government. The only relief comes
from the Karnataka High Court. Acting on a petition of Ganapathi Mangre, sarpanch of one
of the affected villages, the court has appointed two commissioners to look into the
entire rehabilitation process. However, it did not stop the demolition of the villages.
Way back in the '70s, Karwar was identified as an ideal site for a naval base since the
congested Mumbai harbour was both insecure and inadequate to meet the needs of the navy.
Says former chief of naval staff Admiral O.S. Dawson (retd): "Karwar's topography
makes it the best place to locate a naval base." Work on the project, codenamed
Seabird, began during the time of prime minister Rajiv Gandhi. With the evacuation of the
core villages of Arga, Chendia, Aligadda and Binaga, the mod hopes to get the work going.
These include the construction of three breakwaters, each 5.1 km in length, and the
dredging of the approach channel and the harbour basin. All this is expected to cost about
Rs 600 crore. A consortium of specialist foreign and Indian companies are undertaking the
first phase of the work which is to be completed in five years.
The project will displace about 4,400 families in over 13
villages. To minimise the problem of relocating villagers, the project area was scaled
down from the original 30,400 acres to 8,320 acres. Of this, 2,495 acres were private
holdings while the rest was government land.
The fishermen and the agriculturists affected by the naval
base project say they do not mind being relocated. "All we are asking is, please give
us a better alternative," pleads 47-year-old fisherman Janardhan Chandru. "We
have lived along the sea shore -- just 10 m away from the shore in fact -- for centuries
and suddenly you throw us into the middle of a rocky terrain. What can we do? How do you
go fishing on the rocks?"
Dunga Kumarsa Tandel, aged 70, head of 15 families in the
Chendia village in Karwar taluk, is equally aggrieved. Tandel's house was valued at about
Rs 1 lakh. But all the state Government offered him as rehabilitation grant was Rs 50,000.
"With 15 families, all traditionally fishermen, where can we go with just Rs
50,000?" he asks. The Government has yet to submit a detailed project report for
constructing a fishing harbour at Amadalli and Majalli.
Farmers, too, have been given a raw deal: compensation for
land was fixed at Rs 120-750 per gunta (40 guntas make an acre) depending on the cropping
intensity. "My fertile land is worth Rs 30,000 per gunta but I have got only Rs 120
per gunta," says a farmer. That's because the state Government used 20-year-old
records to fix the rate of compensation.
The misery of the displaced doesn't end here. Unimaginative
bureaucrats have decreed that joint families are a single unit. Says one of those
affected: "It's all right when we are living on our land, not when you are to be
crammed into a 13 ft by 15 ft tin shed (provided to the evacuees as temporary
accommodation)." Irrigation facilities promised in some of the relocation sites are
yet to be developed.
Though the cost of the naval project is pegged at Rs 25,000 crore, the state Government's
rehabilitation package is a stingy Rs 180 crore. Even that is being doled out in
inadequate dribbles that add to the problems of the dislocated. Says 67-year-old farmer
Sadanand Padti, general secretary of the 4,500-member strong Seabird Naval Base Evacuees
Forum, who has lost two acres to the naval project in Avadalli village: "The
Karnataka Government has always been reluctant to provide rehabilitation to
evacuees."
Further, the rehabilitation package does not provide them
with alternative livelihood. Though according to a mou signed on August 6, 1998, the
Centre and the state Government are to provide Rs 50,000 to each project-affected family,
the package does not adequately address more pressing questions relating to rehabilitating
the economic earning power of the fisherfolk and the farmers. Work on seven rehabilitation
centres was begun by the state government way back in 1991. The centres were to have
shops, a post office, a police outpost, a primary healthcare centre, a veterinary
dispensary, a primary school, roads, drinking water and electricity.
But a visit to the Mudageri rehabilitation centre shows that
this programme is way behind schedule. A lone watchman there says: "Nobody wants to
move here because this is a complete wilderness.There is no water, roads or even basic
civic amenities." There were no signs of the metalled roads or the primary health
care centre and veterinary hospital the Government claims to have built there.
The district administration has now accelerated the
rehabilitation work. Says R.S. Raikar, general manager of the Seabird project: "We
have met all the demands of the evacuees. Our rehabilitation centres are ready for
occupation and we have identified all the families for compensation. So there is no
problem."
But his words provide little comfort to the affected farmers
and fisherfolk who will take a long time to recover from the trauma of dislocation from
their ancestral lands. |