ON THE BALL
Time for ChangeAzharuddin has had a
good run as captain. Now India has to find a successor who is more forceful.
By Kapil
Dev
After all the
hype that was built up over the World Cup, the end was a damper. Australia clinically
killed Pakistan in the final. Almost everybody was disappointed with the way the
tournament ended. I especially felt sorry for the Pakistani supporters. So many of them
had flown in for the match and had paid huge amounts for the tickets.
The match began well enough. Saeed Anwar got going and played
some good shots. But then the strength of Australia shone through. Their fielding was
spectacular and I would rate the catch that Ricky Pointing took to end the Pakistani
innings the best of the tournament. I think Pakistan took the field a dejected side. A
score of 132 is nothing to defend. I know that we scored only 183 in 1983 but it was close
to 200. Even a county side can make 132 these days. I'm quite certain this match will go
down as the worst final in any sport.
My last hour of the match was spent meeting old friends and
reacquainting myself with Lord's. I last played here in the '80s and the place has changed
a lot. The stadium has received a face-lift and looks phenomenal. The stands have been
built up on both sides. The press box must be the most modern in the world. You are
suspended in air with this glorious panoramic view of the whole ground. The pavilion,
stands and hospitality were excellent. My hats off to the committee.
Since I'm on BCCI's grounds committee I made a special effort
to inspect the grounds in England. One must take a leaf out of their book. Each stadium
caters not only to the needs of the players but are also spectator-friendly. Restaurants,
bars, toilets, there's everything for the spectators. I must also say the spectators
follow the rules. We in India tend to misuse the facilities. In England the number of
people at the ground are always within the prescribed limit. In India gate-crashers often
hold sway. We must control the swarms of friends and relatives who enter stadiums
ticketless. Only then can we raise our standards.
Change is the demand of the new millennium. I am surprised at
the way cricket is changing. I retired just four years ago but could be a generation away.
The home of cricket has changed, the spectators have changed. Yet, we don't seem to. Soon
after the Lord's final, an old and "propah" Englishman told the BBC that he was
a member of the MCC but not a "stuffy" one because one had to move with the
times. So if the world is moving with the times should not we be doing that as well?
In the '60s when someone did something brilliant on the field
everyone clapped from afar. In the '70s Bishan Bedi changed that and showed his joy by
jumping and running towards the fielders. In the '80s everyone rallied together patting
each other on the back. In the '90s players are like footballers, not concealing their joy
and desire to win. I have been a Gandhian all my life. My sports idol has been Bjorn Borg
who was always composed. But today winning is all important.
Mohammed Azharuddin is unparalleled as a batsman and has had
a good run as captain of India. But if feel the time has come to find a captain who can
show aggression and hold the team together better. I say this not because we have lost the
World Cup but because I genuinely feel that Azhar has lasted his time. We have to change
our outlook as today winning has become the name of the game.
Our team needs a Hitler to pull it through. Unlike our
politicians our cricketers have adopted a peaceful policy. Today we need aggression, power
and strength. I sometimes wonder what I would do if I was captain now. Would I have been
able to change my attitude? For survival I would have had to.
We need someone very strong and apparent at the helm. There
is no place for subtlety any longer. We need someone who can ensure closeness and push the
team when the need arises. I personally feel Sachin Tendulkar is the ideal person for the
job because he is mature and strong. But he seems to be like Richard Hadlee who just
wanted to play and never wanted to captain his country. Ajay Jadeja is the other candidate
with strong credentials. His captaincy in Sharjah was not brilliant but good enough to
pull the team together. That's what the team requires now. Jadeja showed in Sharjah what
he's capable of. Why then aren't we doing anything?
The policy today is to destroy your opponents physically and
mentally. Go for the kill, as they say. That is what Australia did to Pakistan. Whenever
Pakistan play Australia again they will be reminded of Lord's 1999. They have been badly
scalded. So, in keeping with the changed attitude, let us also go in for an aggressive
captain. Someone who can demand and get what he wants until Indian cricket is back on the
rails. Charity definitely takes a back seat.
Former India captain and allrounder Kapil Dev will be
writing a regular column exclusively for
India Today till the end of the World Cup. |