| The business of a country at war throws up many issues and
sidelights. There is uncertainty, tragedy, tales of bravery and sacrifice, political
infighting and diplomatic intrigue. In this, public mood is often lost. More so in a
nation that has learnt to isolate conflict: Kashmir would hardly create a ripple in
Bengal, the North-east in Gujarat, Punjab in Pondicherry. But the almost universal outpouring of public sentiment and support, as the
Kargil war approaches two months, is reminiscent of 1971, when someone else's problem
became a nation's concern. The continuing conflict has prompted us to put Kargil on the
cover for an unprecedented fifth time in a row. This week we address another
top-of-the-mind question: Will the war spread?
Even as this is a logical progression in our coverage of the
war and its possible solutions (previous covers dealt with intelligence failures and how
long the war would last), it has led us to ask questions far more human in nature. Last
week's cover story was a tribute to fallen warriors and the emotions their funerals
evoked. These images and every additional casualty are driving the mood of the nation. It
is there in a Bengal taxi union's blood donation camp and their forfeiting almost a day's
earnings for Kargil soldiers. It is there in some widows donating a portion of their
meagre pension. Nearly every state government is helping raise funds.
This is as it should be. Equally, as the country routinely
goes about its governance, business and survival, it is as it should be as well. In 1971
everything was secondary to the war effort. Now it is quite easy to discuss the cutting
edge of the digital revolution in India, a major story in this issue. This, even as the
country is on the edge of a large-scale conflict. I sincerely hope it doesn't come to that
because in war even a victor pays a very heavy price.

(Aroon Purie) |