CINEMA: HARIKRISHNANS
Twice Tossed GambleThe two endings of the film made it a hit but this didn't go
down well with the censors.
By M G Radhakrishnan
Purushothaman,
an avid film buff was stunned. When he first saw the film Harikrishnans, released in early
September, at a Thiruvananthapuram theatre, its ending went like this: the heroine Meera
(Juhi Chawla) tosses a tulsi leaf in the air to choose between the two men (played by
Mammooty and Mohanlal) who love her -- she calls one Hari and the other Krishnan. The leaf
drops on the name Hari. A week later when Purushothaman saw the film at a theatre in
neighbouring Kollam district he rubbed his eyes in disbelief. This time round the tulsi
leaf fell on the name Krishnan!
The use of different endings in two versions of the same film
was an unprecedented device employed in the hilarious Malayalam film produced by actor
Mohanlal's wife Suchitra and directed by the hit-maker Fazil. The double ending was
obviously an attempt to make a killing at the box office by pleasing the fans loyal to
both the reigning stars -- Mammooty and Mohanlal.
In the film, writer-director Fazil combines comedy and
mystery in a tale of two advocate friends -- both named Harikrishan -- who set out to
crack a murder case. During their investigation they come across Meera and both fall in
love with her. She too is in a dilemma because she likes both of them.
The masterly marketing trick appears to have worked as the Rs
2.5 crore film (a big budget by Malayalam film industry standards) recovered costs within
two weeks of its release. But the ploy has landed its producer and director in a soup. The
film has run into rough weather with the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC)
because it seems one of the versions was not certified by the board. In a notice served to
the producer, CBFC Regional Director P.M. Raju warned that the board would take legal
action against her for screening uncertified parts of the film unless they were withdrawn.
Sensing trouble, Suchitra was quick to assure the CBFC that
the uncertified parts of the film had been withdrawn. In her explanation to the board, she
said this had happened due to a "mix-up" while editing the film's climax. That's
a bit hard to swallow, but the end result is a victory for the fans of Mohanlal. The final
version of the film that most people are likely to see in the future is the one in which
Mohanlal is the lucky suitor. Bad news for Mammooty's fans.
However, the film had set off a debate even before the CBFC
warning, with some filmmakers even dubbing the dual ending "an unethical commercial
trick". "This sort of gimmick is unthinkable for someone who considers cinema an
artistic creation," said director Shaji N. Karun, chairman of the Kerala Chalachitra
Akademi. There were others who made more serious charges, saying the two versions of the
film have been distributed keeping the religious affiliations of the fans in mind.
Mammooty, a Muslim, is believed to be more popular in the Muslim-dominated northern
districts of the state, while Mohanlal, a Hindu, is the favourite in the southern
districts where Hindus are in a majority. There are charges that in the prints shown in
northern districts Mammooty got Juhi and Mohanlal won her in the prints screened in
southern districts. The director Fazil strongly refutes such charges. "This is a
baseless allegation. I have tried this out across the state irrespective of the communal
configuration."
Ace director Priyadarshan is critical of the whole fracas and
says the double ending was a masterly marketing strategy. "The ending pleased all and
the film's success pumped much-needed oxygen into the sick industry. Why should anyone
rake up an unseemly controversy over it?" There's something in what he says. The
Malayalam film industry has been badly hit, with the number of annual productions likely
to touch an all-time low of around 50 films, compared to the 180 a decade ago. Last year,
57 of the 80 films produced -- including those of superstars like Mammooty and Mohanlal --
bombed at the box office.
The double ending was a successful ploy -- the fans were
happy, the film raked in millions and revived the industry. Too bad the CBFC and its rules
played spoil sport. |