STATES: MAHARASHTRA
Aftershocks
of the DebacleShiv Sena chief Bal
Thackeray raps his chief minister and almost pulls the government down.
By V Shankar Aiyar
It is 6.30 p.m. on Wednesday at the chief
minister's office at the Vidhan Bhavan in Mumbai. A group of MLAs waiting to meet Manohar
Joshi are engaged in an animated discussion on the reasons for the Shiv Sena-BJP combine's
debacle in the recent Lok Sabha polls. Janardhan Tupe, the Peasants' and Workers' Party
MLA from Beed, is holding forth. "Children in Marathwada have not seen a train but
thanks to Gopinath Munde (deputy chief minister) they know what a helicopter looks
like."
It is black humour at its political best. Tupe's remarks
provoke loud guffaws. And even the alliance MLAs laugh nervously, aware of the fragility
of their mandate. Inside, Joshi goes a step further, indulging in gallows humour. Quoting
Veer Savarkar, he states: "I do not worry about that which is beyond my
control." The reference obviously was to Thackeray's remote control.
The realisation could not have been more timely. Just four
days prior to that, Sena chief Bal Thackeray had in an interview in the party paper Saamna
rapped the alliance Government in general and Joshi in particular for his alleged
connections with power broker Raj Dadarkar and his closeness to Congress leader Sharad
Pawar. Thackeray also announced sanyas from party affairs. Many interpreted these as signs
that Thackeray wanted Joshi out.
In the interview, Thackeray said that Dadarkar had taken Rs
40 lakh for getting certain works done. Dadarkar belongs to the Mumbai builders' lobby and
is said to be a close associate of Joshi's son Unmesh. Interestingly, Congress MLA R.R.
Patil had also charged that Dadarkar, with Joshi's backing, had clandestinely taken over
several school buildings in Dadar and was part of a ruling clique that was influencing
decisions in the Urban Development Ministry, which is under Joshi's charge.
The Sena chief was also particularly piqued with Joshi for
not attacking Pawar with the same vigour like him. Thackeray believes there is a
Joshi-Pawar nexus and sees evidence of this in the fact that Pawar takes care not to
attack Joshi while targeting the alliance and Joshi leaves Pawar out on the rare occasions
that he attacks the Congress. Sena-BJP functionaries also allege that Joshi prevented the
Government advocate from cross-examining Pawar before the Srikrishna Commission.
By Sunday the trauma of the shock treatment had gripped the
Sena ranks. Visiting ministers, the assembly Speaker and media persons were targeted by a
2,000-strong mob outside Thackeray's residence Matoshree. Come evening, Joshi returned
from his weekend sojourn at a yoga spa appropriately called "Manashanti" and met
Thackeray. Thirty six hours after the Saamna interview, Thackeray relented on one count:
he let Joshi continue, even if on probation. But he held steadfast on the sanyas.
The Congress couldn't have asked for a better opening for the
budget session. Chhagan Bhujbal, leader of the opposition, quipped: "It was nothing
but a mediocre performance of the T. Balu Drama Company. He should understand that he has
done enough nautanki. It doesn't draw applause each time." But applaud they did.
Indeed, Pawar joined the fray by first challenging Thackeray's might -- "He can't
pull Joshi down" -- and then by commending Joshi -- "He is a good chief
minister".
So far, Thackeray hasn't risen to the bait. But then the Sena
chief is known for his sense of timing. Which is why most Sena and BJP functionaries were
at a loss to explain the shock treatment and the trauma that followed. For, only 15 days
earlier Thackeray had stopped Joshi from resigning. So why the sudden explosion? The
charitable views are: he wanted to assert himself, show he was in control and that he
wanted to shock the alliance Government into action. And almost on cue, Thackeray stated
on March 22: "We've had three years of promises, now let's see some action."
The uncharitable view -- apart from Bhujbal's "it is his
whimsical style, typically Thackeray" -- was that this was one way to ensure the
Government protects him from possible indictment by the Srikrishna Commission. Some even
believe Thackeray wanted to anoint his son Udhav, some feel it is the rise of Joshi's son
Unmesh, while others believe that Joshi's perceived closeness to Pawar tested Thackeray's
patience. The truth lies somewhere betwixt.
Thackeray and the BJP leadership in Delhi are aware that
Maharashtra plays a crucial role in their bid to retain power. The alliance simply can't
afford non-performance, inefficiency and charges of corruption. Not that they can charge
Joshi or his deputy Munde substantially with any of these. They have held together what is
essentially one of the most inexperienced cabinets ever.
But the fact is that the duo has not delivered on any of the
promises -- from water for all villages to jhunka bhakar schemes to free housing to higher
employment -- that the alliance had loftily made in its vachannama (manifesto). A section
of the BJP leadership feels that Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee and Thackeray are
perhaps acting in tandem. Says a senior RSS leader: "The clouds may have cleared but
the storm could still come. At the end of the session you could still see some major
changes. Clearly they feel that a clean up will be good for the health of the
alliance."
But given the choice before the alliance leadership, it seems
unlikely that there is much to choose from. What's worse, the purgation almost put the
alliance in ICU. Their only hope is that the shock administered by Thackeray's remote
control could just about resuscitate the alliance. May be, just about.
INTERVIEW:
MANOHAR JOSHI
"Success is a big enemy"
|
Maharashtra
Chief Minister Manohar Joshi spoke to Associate Editor
V Shankar Aiyar and Principal Correspondent Smruti Koppikar. Excerpts:
Has the storm passed?
Yes, positively. Nothing serious really happened.
Isn't it serious that a chief minister
came close to being thrown out by his party chief?
I don't know why this happened. Someone poisoned Balasaheb's ears. It's very tragic
because this damaged the party's image.
But Thackeray's ire was directed against
you.
I don't think so. Within 36 hours he endorsed me again.
Who is against you?
I can't tell you who's against me but they are jealous of my success as chief
minister. Success is a big enemy.
But your Government is being criticised
for non-performance.
This is not a grocer's shop. It's government work and it takes time.
Do you regret your friendship with
Sharad Pawar and businessman Raj Dadarkar?
Sometimes friendships cause problems but I haven't met Pawar in the last six
months. And Dadarkar is not a friend. Now I have told my son also to be careful of the
people he associates with.
You know Thackeray closely. Why did he
behave like this?
I will explain this episode when I write his biography. I'm planning one.
Are you into your second innings now?
No, I'm still playing my first innings. Only it was a bouncer and it missed me.
Are you as confident as you were three
years ago?
Yes and no. |
|