





|
Shuttlecock
356 Evolve a consensus on the norms
for imposing President's rule
IWhen Sonia Gandhi became president of the Congress
there were apprehensions, expressed by friends and foes of the party alike, that she could
well be in a hurry to pull down the BJP-led Government at the Centre. The idea was fuelled
by the apparent vulnerability of the ruling coalition, with its self-serving members like
the AIADMK demanding the scalp of local rivals such as Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M.
Karunanidhi as the flag-down fare for support. Many thought the BJP Government was a
pushover. They speculated Sonia had moved quickly to assume the reins of her centenarian
party so as to leave no doubt as to who its boss is should a new round of jockeying for
power begin in the 12th Lok Sabha. The backdrop to such speculation was provided by the
non-stop efforts of Marxist leaders like H.S. Surjeet and Samajwadi Party leader Mulayam
Singh Yadav to gather Sonia's support in dislodging Prime Minister A.B. Vajpayee.
By not obliging her friends of convenience in being party to
any toppling conspiracy, Sonia has shown a refreshing readiness to change the old mindset
of Congressmen: of being unable to think of life in politics beyond the seat of
government. Most recently, her relatively cold reaction to the invitation to join the
Rashtriya Loktantrik Morcha, set up by Mulayam and Laloo Yadav, underlines the maturity of
her judgement about the Congress' future role. The country, after perilously experimenting
for 21 years with ragtag coalitions, is now about to accept that there is little political
space beyond the BJP and the Congress. In their composition, these two parties allow the
widest spectra of thoughts, intentions and regional as well as sub-regional identities. In
these circumstances, Sonia's priority is to mould the Congress into a national alternative
and to wait till she comes to power on her own terms -- rather than on those dictated by
fractious regional chieftains or by ageing communists who would like to stay in power at
all costs.
Globalised
Rupee
The rupee's value is being linked to sanctions -- and
much blame lies with India
A country's currency buys more than just goods and
services. It buys confidence. That ability -- or the perception of that ability -- is what
drives currency rates. If the rupee has gone anywhere but up, touching Rs 43 to the US
dollar -- and there are many who expect it to measure Rs 48 by the end of this year --
then that is its value, a reflection of the strength or weakness of the economy. We all
know that. But there is a worrying link that has developed for the past month or so: all
of a sudden the value of the rupee is being linked to sanctions imposed by the United
States. And there is little that anyone in the Ministry of Finance as well as the RBI is
doing to dispel that notion even as the rupee is now being clubbed with foreign policy.
Such perceptions have to be reversed urgently. Markets and
currencies across Asia have tumbled over the past few months. Moving steadily westwards,
institutional investors have transferred hundreds of billions of dollars from countries
they perceived to be weak. They effectively drove down free-floating currencies by pulling
out their funds. That is a price, however unsavoury, to pay for a stake in the global
village. But surely people realise that the plummeting won, baht and rupiah didn't owe
their demise to their relationship with the US or any other country for that matter.
Unfortunately in India's case, caught up as the investing public is in the general
slowdown of the economy, a government perceived as indecisive, a system that frankly sees
in a weaker rupee more exports and more import revenue -- both dreams can turn out to be
tragically hollow -- sanctions are only fuelling speculative fires. This can lead to a run
on the rupee. The government should bolster the currency, otherwise such a confluence of
developments can be incendiary. This is most definitely a crisis of confidence. And there
is earthly reason to make it worse. |