ANDHRA PRADESH
Mum's the WordEven after four years and 14 sessions, silence in the Assembly remains golden
for a dozen TDP MLAs.
By Amarnath K Menon
In the Venkatagiri assembly
constituency skirting the Andhra Pradesh-Tamil Nadu border, he is revered as Raja garu,
the scion of a wealthy zamindar family. To an older generation of cricket buffs in the
south, he is more familiar as the former captain of the Andhra cricket team. Now 73,
V.V.S.V.R.K. Yachendra is the third oldest member of the Andhra Pradesh Assembly. But four
years after making his political debut in December 1994, he feels he has had enough.
"I won't be fighting elections again," he says, quite unlike politicians. That,
however, is not the only thing that sets him apart: so far he hasn't uttered a single word
in the Assembly.
Yachendra, of course, has company. In the state Assembly,
there are a dozen members like him who have not yet opened their mouths. Incidentally, all
are from the ruling TDP. Assembly records show that the only time they ever spoke was when
they took oaths as MLAs in December 1994. Since then the Assembly has had 14 sessions
lasting 191 days. Even the advent of television coverage of the assembly proceedings has
failed to enthuse these members.
The legislators dismiss charges that they are not taking
their jobs seriously. "Why should I speak in the House when I know how to take care
of my people?" argues N. Moola Reddy. He may have a point. In an end-July TDP
internal survey conducted in his Anaparthy constituency in East
Godavari district, Reddy had notched up an impressive
popularity rating of 72.2 per cent compared to the 59.7 per cent that Chief Minister and
party President N. Chandrababu Naidu logged. Evidently, in Moola Reddy's case, actions do
speak louder than words.
Not all are similarly blessed, yet they come up with
innovative excuses for their long silence in the House. M. Vijayapal Reddy vowed after
winning the Narayankhed seat that he would win it a second time. That is a tall order
since nobody has won the seat in consecutive elections. "So, I keep a low profile in
Hyderabad, stay away from the Assembly and concentrate on developing my backward
constituency," he explains. Vijayapal Reddy shuttles between his modest apartment in
Hyderabad and Narayankhed in nearby Medak district. There is, however, a laminated
portrait of the assembly building on his bedroom wall, presumably to remind him that he
continues to be an MLA.
Others are brash enough to admit that attending the assembly
sessions is a waste of time. "Quite often, issues raised in the House are
irrelevant," says Y.T. Prabhakar Reddy, owner of two theatres in his Madakasira
constituency. There is some substance in his argument. Of a total 1,228 hours that the
House met, 120 hours were lost simply because members derailed proceedings. "It costs
the state Rs 10,000 for every minute the House is in session and members only spend 10 per
cent of the time discussing legislation," says an exasperated Speaker Yanamala
Ramakrishnudu. The Speaker wants to change things. He recently introduced several measures
to make the proceedings in the Assembly more responsive to the demands of the MLAs. Among
these were:
- Ministers to give written replies within a week to any query
raised by a member during zero hour.
- Action Taken Reports of the Government to be tabled within six
months of a House committee presenting a report.
- Comply with any assurance made by a minister to a member in
the House by sending an implementation report within 60 days.
Still, the members persist with their indifference. Only a
handful use the well-stocked assembly library and most scan the newspapers only to see if
there's any mention of their names. Some months ago, the Internet facility was extended to
all MLAs, but so far its only users are the Speaker and a Congress MLA K.R. Suresh Reddy.
The techno-savvy chief minister even organised a computer training programme for MLAs
after which he offered soft-term loans to them to buy computers. Only four ministers opted
to buy laptops while 47 MLAs went in for desktop models.
The Speaker confesses that there is little he can do to make
MLAs more accountable and perform the primary function for which they are elected. "I
can regulate business in the House but I can't force members to take more interest in
their business," he says. The pity is the MLAs also are aware of the limits of the
Speaker's powers. |