





|
EXCLUSIVE: P CHIDAMBARAM
What We Need is a BreakthroughThe BJP's tax-and-spend policy is no recipe for survival.
Is there a recession? The debate has raged for several
months and there is no sign of its end. Notwithstanding the finance minister's promise
that revival will begin in September, let's closely examine the "recession".
Recession, according to its classic definition, means negative growth in two successive
quarters. Nothing like that happened in 1997-98, nor is it likely to happen in 1998-99.
Slow growth is unacceptable. Thank God, we no longer pat
ourselves for achieving the "Hindu" rate of growth that the country witnessed
for three decades -- 1950 to 1980. We must accelerate growth. But where?
The services sector continues to grow at a healthy rate of
over 7 per cent. This must be sustained. It can be done by more reforms that directly
impact the services sector. For instance, banking reforms, opening up insurance, allowing
Tata Airlines to take off, giving autonomy to port managements (and not arbitrarily
transferring inconvenient chairmen), resolving the problems of cellular and basic
telephony licensees and so on. While each of these requires technical decisions, each also
requires, most importantly, a political decision. If the decisions at the cabinet-level
are taken NOW, we may expect a spurt in the growth rate in the last quarter of 1998-99.
Until then, we may settle for 7-8 per cent, and thank the policy decisions of yesteryears.
Next comes agriculture. Thanks to another good monsoon, and
despite the floods in some parts, agricultural production is poised to bounce back to the
record level attained in 1996-97. Statistically, that will translate into sectoral growth
rate of 2-3 per cent. The Government will be happy, but I would be disappointed. What we
need is a breakthrough. We need to get out of the plateau levels reached in wheat and
paddy production; we need a significant break in cotton and oilseeds output; we also need
larger exportable surpluses of tea, coffee, tobacco and spices. The term
"revival", in the context of the agricultural sector, would be appropriate only
when the sectoral growth rate exceeds 4 per cent and is sustained at that level for at
least a decade. Many steps are possible. The Accelerated Irrigation Benefit Programme
(AIBP) must be closely monitored and targeted acreage brought under assured irrigation.
Small and medium farmers must be given access to farm credit. All controls on the movement
of agricultural products must be scrapped forthwith.
Finally, I turn to the real problem area which is industry.
It is the revival of manufacturing which will turn the tide and lift the spirits of the
nation. Demand for industrial goods has slackened over the last 12 months. Not because
there is a lack of money or purchasing power. Witness the fact that in 1997-98 the target
of Rs 14,000 crore for "small savings, PPF and deposit schemes" ballooned to Rs
25,478 crore. In the same period, bank deposits grew enormously. People are earning and
saving. They are not spending. Nor are people -- mainly entrepreneurs -- investing.
Industries are not adding to capacity or upgrading machinery or investing in new
technology. Everybody seems to have adopted a wait-and-watch attitude. The reason is not
far to seek. Everyone, but everyone, is worried about the uncertainty. Uncertainty began
in April 1997 when the Deve Gowda government was brought down, it deepened after the fall
of the Gujral government and the mood has worsened in the past four weeks.The BJP
Government is not helping matters either. It still swears by its ill-conceived
"tax-and-spend" policy. It has given up the pretence of inflation control.
Political uncertainty and rising inflation have affected consumer spending and investment.
A recipe for revival of the manufacturing sector must address the core issues. The ball is
squarely in the court of the Government.
Public expenditure will, no doubt, help. But not all public
expenditure is necessarily productive. Besides, the effort must be to complete ongoing
projects, not merely start new projects, and add to the portfolio of projects which have
suffered time and cost over-runs. The BJP Government has set store by public expenditure,
and the means of financing it are largely Internal and Extra-Budgetary Resources (IEBR).
Not much, I am afraid, will be accomplished this year.
Another approach is possible to revive specific segments of
the manufacturing sector. The ones that are most sluggish are steel, automobiles, textiles
and construction. The Government could take courage in both hands and slash excise duties
on these products. A special package of incentives could be given to boost export of steel
and textiles. Tax benefits could be given for housing starts made in 1998-99. To do all
this, the requirements are political stability and loads of courage. To a government
fiercely devoted to a "tax and spend" policy, the slew of measures I have
advocated would be anathema. So, settle for industrial growth of 6-7 per cent. The year
1998-99 will therefore witness not recession or stagflation, but modest GDP growth and
high inflation. I can hear the BJP saying, "That will do nicely, thank you."
Revival, in a true sense, would have to await better policies and determined governance.
Yashwant Sinha
Pranab Mukherjee
Cover Story |