FIFTH COLUMN
Who Cares?People are fed up with polls and broken promises.
Tavleen Singh
It must be something to do with the fine speeches our
political leaders make on the hustings. Invariably when elections are in the air I see
things momentarily with fresh eyes. So although it's a street I know well, while walking
down it this time I looked at it anew. I saw a young boy from Bihar who was barely into
his teens and had come to the city looking for a job. His eyes filled with fear when I
asked him where he had come from. He seemed to think I would send him back. He said he had
no relatives in the city, no skills of any kind. But he had been told it was easy to find
work. Besides, there was nothing in his village to go back to.
I saw a family from somewhere in southern India. There was a
scrawny young woman with three small children in rags. When she saw me she sent the
children along to beg. They made whining noises, scratched their unwashed hair and rubbed
their distended stomachs: "Khana khayega memsahib (We want to eat)." There were
other children. Malnourished, barefoot, ill-clad. They positioned themselves at traffic
lights so that they could use cleaning windscreens as an excuse to beg. They competed with
older, more skilled beggars who had learnt the art of whining and limping instantly on
sighting a soft target.
These are India's average citizens. These are the people whom
elections, democracy and the fine words our politicians spew forth are really meant to
help. Yet elections come and go and their lives remain just the same. Everyone knows the
figures but its worth remembering them in election season: 52.5 per cent of Indians live
on less than a dollar a day; 71 per cent have no access to sanitation; 19 per cent have no
access to clean drinking water; 15 per cent have no access to health services. Over 35
million of India's children in the 6-10 age group do not attend primary school.
Is it any wonder that most Indians are beginning to be weary
of elections? Once upon a time, elections evoked excitement in India. There was a festival
quality about them with everyone sharing the thrill and drama of this celebration of
democracy. But judging by the lack of interest and ennui that were the main emotions
aroused by this past week's assembly elections, it's clear things have changed.
When you ask people why they seem so indifferent to the
speeches our political leaders have been making and to their new set of promises, they
tell you they have heard everything before. The remark most commonly heard from the
"average" voters I talked to was: "They're all the same. It makes no
difference who wins."
There isn't disappointment with Atal Bihari Vajpayee's
Government specifically -- although the price of onions united common people and the
chattering classes this time -- there is disappointment with all politicians. More
disturbingly, there is disappointment with a democratic system which only seems to throw
up governments that can't govern.
Where you notice special disappointment with Vajpayee is in
the fact that there were many who believed the BJP would be able to do better than the
rest. In retrospect, it's hard to see why this impression should have got around since the
BJP had shown no special qualities while governing states like Uttar Pradesh and
Rajasthan. But the belief persisted long enough to turn now into bitter disappointment.
Six months of BJP rule at the Centre have made it clear the party never had an agenda for
governance. No economic policy. No political insights. No plans for administrative reform.
No nothing. The result was when the BJP took power in Delhi it was content to merely do
what it thought every other government had done before. It went through the motions of
governance instead of really governing.
Had there been someone, just one person, in the BJP's
plethora of think tanks who had been working on a proper agenda -- instead of
tongue-twisting slogans: swadeshi, swawlamban, swaraj -- it would have been noticed a long
time ago that Congress' ideas of governance have failed. Specifically, they have failed in
areas like healthcare, sanitation, literacy and rural development. Once this realisation
dawned it would have been quite easy to recognise that these were the areas for the BJP to
focus on.
It would also have been realised that the Congress' vaunted
economic reforms amounted mainly to ending industrial licences and making foreign
investment easier. After this, P.V. Narasimha Rao did nothing. If the economic think tank
had consisted of economists rather than Hindu nationalists with inferiority complexes
Vajpayee would have had an agenda of reforms to work on. Instead he has had to rely on
grandiose schemes -- like a highway from Kashmir to Kanyakumari -- which appear to have
been conceived in desperation, alas again by people who have no idea of what it takes to
build a road.
It is fashionable in Delhi these days to say the BJP has been
unable to run a proper government because of pressures and pulls from its coalition
partners. This is a silly excuse. Vajpayee's Government will start to function perfectly
the day he works out what exactly he wants to do. Which bills, for instance, does he plan
to pass in the next session of Parliament? What does he plan to do about healthcare and
population control? If primary education is being made compulsory, which classes will this
scheme cover? If the superhighway is to be built, then where is the money going to come
from and when will it be ready?
Meanwhile, elections will come and go and the average Indian
will become increasingly indifferent to who wins or loses. Because in his heart he knows
"they're all the same. It makes no difference who wins". |