





|
NASEERUDIN SHAH
Mr ChameleonAfter success in
parallel cinema and mediocrity in mainstream the actor finds his metier in urban chic.
By
Priya Ramani
Naseeruddin Shah is looking sharp. Clad in sneakers and a white tracksuit,
collar turned up, he seems ready to take on anyone. At 49, he's definitely older. His
face, which kaleidoscopes into myriad expressions, is carved into deep, world-weary lines.
His hair is close-cropped and a wiry grey. But his walk has an unmistakable-almost
rakish-bounce and that infectious throaty laugh is heard often enough.
For a while the moody Mr Shah had taken over, dispatching his
trademark laugh backstage and discarding parallel cinema like a bad smell, while he
zombied his way this decade through one indifferent commercial film after another: he was
always good, the films were not. And all the while he cursed parallel filmmakers and the
world in general. Like Prometheus bound.
These days the actor who always kept one foot steadfastly in
serious theatre has enough reasons to look cheery. If his latest screen appearance in
cocky new-wave director Kaizad Gustad's Bombay Boys is any indication of things to come,
Shah has done it again, both on screen and stage. The film is still packing in crowds,
especially the capricious young. And (W)hole in the Head, a collection of monologues
directed and performed by Shah and Mahabanoo Mody-Kotwal opened to rave reviews in Mumbai
and Delhi recently.
Lucky Naseer: there's a new buzz about the
man. It's not that he's changed-he has always been an actor par excellence-Indian cinema
has. It's now ready for him. He's taken to the just out experimental cinema of urban chic
like a duck to water. And the audience is clapping. While contemporaries like Nana Patekar
struggle through a set of prescribed roles, Shah has managed the transition from mediocre
mainstream to films like Bombay Boys with his irresistible insouciance. In Gustad's comedy
for instance, he steals the thunder as the violent yet loveable Mumbai mobster Mastana who
gets to kiss the only female lead in the movie. Even the critics have largely ignored the
"boys" and directed praise at Shah. It's easy to be evil, but to be evil and
funny is a tall order. And that's where the maniacal grin of his comes in handy.
Shah believes he is getting better as he gets older. Govind
Nihalani, who last directed Shah in Drohkaal, agrees: "I think he has
matured, much like old wine. His acting has acquired greater depth." Even the
infamous temper has mellowed a bit. When he has an occasional outburst-as he did when he
discovered he had to act in three shows of (W)hole in the Head in a single day-he
regains his equilibrium instantly. "Losing your temper is as much a habit as drinking
tea or smoking cigarettes or drugs ... I'm trying to kick it."
The future looks good. Apart from two films by debut
directors, Mahesh Mathai and John Matthew, Shah also stars in friend Pankuj Parashar's
forthcoming English movie, Spice Boy, to be shot in London. Other ventures
include teaching at the National School of Drama, an NFDC film and a spy serial for Zee
TV. Through this transition, too, Shah maintains his link with theatre. He plans to direct
A Romance For Ruby, starring wife Ratna and colleague Mody-Kotwal.
Shah is also master of the stage universe: as his tour de
force performance as Gandhi in the play Mahatma vs Gandhi, which travelled in India and
abroad last year, proves. And in (W)hole in the Head the actor shifts chameleon-like
between three radically different characters. Shah's performances are uncannily
believable. Perhaps because he has spent half his life consciously trying to be someone
else.
It is this seemingly effortless ability to slip under any
character's skin that has always ensured his success. Shah proudly says that he has no
niche: "I have managed to avoid the trap." Thus the experiment with the
larger-than-life romantic hero of commercial cinema was in some ways just that-a
self-imposed test of his ability to play different roles. "It was an aspect of myself
which I had to test and I'm not ashamed to admit I failed," Shah explains. "One
can't do everything," he adds. Grinning because he knows he has played all parts-from
the libidinous villain and blind school principal to the famished villager and beefy
weightlifter-picking up several trophies in the process, including a best actor award for
Paar at the 1984 Venice Film Festival.
Gustad says viewers came up to him at international
screenings of his movie and asked incredulously, "Where has Shah been all these
years?" The last few years have seen Shah involved in a series of disastrous projects
including the much-hyped Cyrano, a play that opened to sharp criticism at London's West
End in late-1995. "I thought this was the end of my career as an actor," he
recalls.
Quite an unlikely scenario for the man who has always managed
to rejuvenate himself. The actor who stopped taking himself seriously after he wore a
swimsuit in Tehalka, says he is a "genial old man" who is optimistic about life.
In the coming year, the plan to direct his own movie may take precedence. "I've
dreamt of making a funny film," says Shah. His enthusiasm stems more from a sense of
contentment with his own life. "He is surer of himself as a person and actor,"
says wife Ratna. Having adeptly slipped under the skins of hundreds of screen characters,
Shah seems finally comfortable in his own.
SHAH ON SHAH |
The 49-year-old actor
known for his roles in both parallel and mainstream cinema talks about his life, his
career and his dream of directing a film. On himself: I don't take myself seriously at all.
I think I'll manage to fit in pretty well with my kids' generation. The success of Bombay
Boys, Mahatma vs Gandhi and my own sense of contentment in life have a lot
to do with it. I think I'm getting better as I get older and I'm really pleased about
that.
On getting older:
If you feel that your getting older is limiting your abilities as an actor, then your
abilities must have been pretty limited to start with. And I agree that there are no roles
for 50-year-old cherubs in Hindi movies but then surely your personality has some other
facets.
On current projects: Mahesh
Mathai's Bhopal Express and Sarfarosh by John Matthew should be releasing together. In
Sarfarosh I play a ghazal singer and the film is about gun-running and espionage across
the border. Bhopal Express is about the gas tragedy. I play a sceptical rickshaw-driver
who keeps warning the hero working with Union Carbide that someday they're all going to be
very sorry. I'm the prophet of doom.
On quitting Mahatma vs Gandhi: Well,
Feroz Khan is a marketing genius. Basically, he lets the team do all the work and hogs the
credit. This is a pathetic approach to work and I got fed up with it.
On Bollywood stars:
I've seen their acting deteriorate as they get richer and more famous. It's true of all
the biggest stars we have had in this country. They end up becoming caricatures of
themselves.
On Bombay Boys:
People liked me in it, I liked my performance too. The danger is that it can very quickly
become a manner which everyone wants you to repeat and it won't work a second time. I'm on
my guard about it.
On directing films:
I must admit I'm a little apprehensive because it's a massive job. But I think I'm up to
it and I think I won't make a bad movie. After all I've participated in 150 movies by now
and not just as an actor.
I will make a movie and not because I'm dissatisfied with the
kind of roles I'm getting or to provide myself the parts I feel I've been deprived of.
On comedies: I
think I'm good with comedies but there are so few of them made here. They're too bloody
lazy to make comedies because that's damn hard work.
On his dream film:
I dream of making a funny film. I don't want to make an art film or a meaningful film. Nor
do I want to make a formula film with songs. I have a comedy which I'd love to do. It is
based on a wonderful story by Oscar Wilde about a ghost who can't frighten anybody.
Another one is about a wrestler who comes to Mumbai in search of a dream. It is an
allegory on my life.
I'm looking for producers but it is not easy. They don't want
to give money for anything different from the cock-and-bull rubbish about two brothers
lost in a mela.
On what's exciting:
Teaching is exciting. The thought of directing a movie is very exciting too.
On directors: I
would love to work with Shekhar Kapur-he's the best we have. Gulzar, Ram Gopal Varma
maybe. But I'm hoping that soon a fresh crop of filmmakers will arrive.
On new filmmakers:
Yeah? Where? There are not that many. It's too soon to celebrate. Let's see how long these
guys last. We call that wretched thing Sholay technically excellent. Any third-rate
western is as accomplished as Sholay or China Gate. Why are we kidding ourselves about
progress? We've been moving backwards for the past 30 years.
On success: I
was advised to shorten my name, change my name, get a nose-job done and so on. I didn't
listen. Do you think Amitabh Bachchan would have been a bigger success if he was called
Amit Bach? I have absolutely no regrets. I feel that the film industry has been good to me
and I got more than I deserved.
On critics: I'd
say to them that I'm not through yet. Hold on until you've buried me. Then come back and
assess me. I'm not through. |
|