





|
JAMMU AND KASHMIR
A Sinister StrikeThe killing of 23 Pandits in the Valley dashes hopes of
migrants' return and may trigger yet another exodus.
By Suresh Nandi and Harinder
Baweja
Their faces were familiar. He had seen
them visit Motilal's house several times when they came on the pretext of taking medicines
and stayed on till the crack of dawn, after which they disappeared into the caves and
ravines off the Bandipora road. They came again on the night of January 25 and disappeared
once again into the blackness of the night, but this time only after killing nine women,
four children and 10 men.
Fourteen-year-old Vinod Kumar Dhar was the only one who lived
to remember those familiar faces. Faces of the 28-odd men "with long beards",
who entered the four Pandit homes and killed 23 people, including his parents, two sisters
and both brothers. Killings that were significantly timed -- two days before the First
National Winter Games were to be inaugurated by Prime Minister I.K. Gujral. Four days
before Id and one night before the Indian flag was unfurled on Republic Day. The location,
too, had a political message. Wandhama village, 26 km from Srinagar, is part of Ganderbal,
chief minister Farooq Abdullah's constituency.
For Motilal and Vinod's Muslim neighbours, however, the
message was tinged with sadness. Even as they busied themselves collecting firewood for
the mass cremation, the thought was that Wandhama would be remembered as a village that
had been "ethnically cleansed". For the Muslims of Wandhama, Id was indeed an
occasion to mourn, not celebrate, for on January 25 they witnessed not just the death of
their neighbours but the demise of social harmony in Kashmir.
They were happy that at least four of the 12 Pandit families
had resisted the migration wave and stayed on after assurances from their neighbours that
they would not let any harm come to them. The Pandits became fearful again when in March
last year seven of them were gunned down in Sangrampora but had chosen to stay put. After
the recent massacre, however, a majority of the 1,000-odd families which still remain in
the Valley are not sure of their safety. Sadly, nor are their neighbours, for as Makhan
Lal, a Pandit from neighbouring Mangam, says, "Unlike earlier, when our Muslim
brothers used to say they would lay down their lives for us, they are now saying that they
can't make any such assurances because they can't even guarantee their own safety."
Security for the minority community is indeed a serious
issue, especially because they are soft targets and the Farooq government has been found
wanting, mainly because of the stand taken by the chief minister himself. Promising to
personally supervise the re-construction of Pandit homes that have been gutted and
ransacked over the years, Farooq had placed the issue of the return of the minority
community on top of his agenda. But when neither the homes were reconstructed nor any
soft-loans given, the Pandits refused to return. Then, Farooq hardened his stand, saying,
"They can suffer in their camps if they don't want to return." And after January
25, he did a quick somersault once again, saying, "it is not possible for them to
return honourably."
Though in power for over a year now, the Farooq government
has done little to facilitate the return of the migrants. Or provide protection to the
Pandit families who stayed on even after the second wave of migration following the
killings in Sangrampora. Then too, Farooq and Abdul Ahmed Vakil, minister for revenue and
rehabilitation, had promised to post security personnel in villages where Pandit families
were staying. Vakil had also promised to remove the encroachers who had occupied Pandit
homes. A survey was conducted soon after Farooq took over, which revealed that 2,311 homes
had been illegally occupied and 5,344 homes had been gutted. The promise then was that
revenue officers would collect rent from the encroachers and pass it on to the rightful
owners.
An entire year has gone by and the matter has remained on
paper. Says state chief secretary Ashok Jaitley: "The government has now decided to
take over the houses and pay the rent." For the community, however, this is just
another one in the long list of unfulfilled promises. The anger and despair that have been
building up are now culminating in an anti-Farooq sentiment. Daisy Kumari, a Pandit from a
village neighbouring Wandhama, says: "He is now promising to give us weapons
training. What is the guarantee that he is not giving weapons to the other side?"
There is resentment too. While even Gupkar road in Srinagar is cordoned off because Farooq
resides there, they feel little attention is paid to the grave threat they have been
living under.
Farooq went ahead with his schedule of welcoming the prime
minister and escorting him to Gulmarg for the inauguration of the Winter Games on January
27, but had to soon get back to the business of formulating steps to assuage the Pandits,
who are now seriously considering leaving the Valley. And that, acknowledges a Farooq
aide, would be serious. As Divisional Commissioner S.L. Bhat put it, "The few Pandit
families that remain are a social and psychological symbol of Kashmiriyat."
Apart from the promise of providing weapons training and
introducing village-level vigilance committees, the state is seriously considering moving
Pandit families to safer areas, closer to towns and district headquarters to keep Pakistan
from achieving its aim of communalising the situation. In the days after the killings, the
administration has quietly been persuading families to shift, but their answer is the same
-- if they have to move, they would rather shift out of the Valley. And now that the state
is also facing a prolonged election schedule, Kashmir being the last state to go to the
polls, the Pandits are scared that soon they would be targeted again.
The entire nation is with you. We will not let Pakistan
succeed," Gujral assured villagers in Wandhama. But fear is giving way to their firm
resolve to move out. As one of them put it, "Gujral himself is prime minister only
for a short while. We have to think about our own future, especially since each of us
feels that it could be our turn next." Unwilling to trust the government any further,
they point out that even Farooq expressed helplessness when grilled about why the army
post was removed from the village a year ago. The Wandhama killings have once again
highlighted the uneasy equation that exists between the state government and the army.
While Farooq says that the army shifted its garrison despite his opposition, the army
reacted quickly, saying that the militants have "political links" with the
village and that it was because of these links that the militants could carry out the
killings with confidence. A serious charge, which is not going to keep the pandits from
joining their community in Jammu and Delhi, especially since there are differences between
the state Government and the Army even over the number of foreign mercenaries operating in
the Valley.
Pandit organisations like the Kashmir Samiti, Delhi, Panun
Kashmir and All India Kashmiri Samaj have for long been asking various forums, including
the National Human Rights Commission, to ensure the security of the families in the Valley
who preferred to stay on mainly because the small pieces of land were their only source of
livelihood. Or they too, like the remaining 1.25 lakh, would have fled when the slogan of
azadi was being blared from every available loudspeaker.
A point for the Farooq government to consider is that not
only have these people refused to return to the Valley, but a majority of them have been
selling their property in Kashmir, fairly sure that they may never be able to return. Says
Bansi Lal Labroo, a former chief education officer in Srinagar who has been living in a
rented house in Delhi since 1990: "House is a very dear word for me, but what was the
point of hanging on to a skeletal structure. I sold it because even if the government
places a lollipop in front of me, I will not be tempted." Adds Professor Chamanlal
Sapru, who edits a magazine that highlights the problems of the Pandits: "There was a
tendency among those who have landed property to return, but Wandhama has changed
that."
The Wandhama killings have added to the resolve of the
migrants to join the ranks of those who have already transacted their deals. A matter
serious enough for both the state and the Central governments to worry about. For just as
Vinod can't forget those "familiar faces" that orphaned him, the migrants can't
forget the time they had to leave, ironically at dead of the night. |