





|
ASEAN REGIONAL FORUM
Manila SerenadeAt its first post-Pokhran global meeting, despite a
cacophony of hostile criticism, India manages to get key countries to tap their feet to
its nuclear tune.
By Manoj Joshi
INTERVIEW:
JASWANT SINGH
"We withstood the challenge well" |
| Jaswant Singh is happy that there was no unanimity in
condemning India. He spoke to Senior Editor Manoj Joshi in Manila. Excerpts: 
Why is the ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF)
important?
It is the only forum in Asia which deals with security-related issues and
bridges the Asia-Pacific to the Indian Ocean. As the ASEAN describes it, "The
footprint of our concerns cover India." India's engagement in this forum, where the
European Union, G-8 and P-5 are present, is most significant because we participate in its
deliberations as equals. In the present context, it has enabled India to establish contact
with the ASEAN, US, Russia, China and Japan and provided a great opportunity to put across
our point of view.
What have we achieved on the nuclear issue at this
meeting?
India really placed a big question mark before the post-Cold War global
order with its nuclear tests. For India to expect that the rest of the globe would be
indifferent to this development is not realistic ... India is used to diplomacy of the old
mode. The idiom, the demands, the language and priorities of nuclear diplomacy are a new
field for India. The country's nuclear diplomacy was under test in the ARF, not so much in
the ASEAN meeting but most definitely against the P-5 and G-8 countries which were there.
Confronted with this situation, we withstood the challenge well.
What does that mean?
We had to carry the conviction of our rationale based on our national
priorities and imperatives. There was no unanimity in condemning India between ASEAN and
ARF and within P-5 and G-8 which is an aspect of our nuclear diplomacy carrying
conviction. Along with the concern about the tests in South Asia, an item high on India's
list -- disarmament related to Article VI of the NPT -- was placed on the agenda. This is
a matter of extreme discomfiture to nuclear weapons states.
What about talks with Madeleine Albright?
They are part of the talks that have taken place in the past three rounds with
Deputy Secretary of State Strobe Talbott. In that sense they provided a continuation and
confirmation of the US position. I cannot comment on the substance of the continuing
discussions.
This was the first round of high-level talks with
Chinese Foreign Minister Tang Jiaxuan. Is there any positive movement here?
We spent an hour together, double the scheduled time. We placed on the
table our respective concerns. The significance of the meeting was that it took place.
Also significant was its duration and the confirmation that there was interest on both
sides in continuing contact at various levels. |
The message was in the medium. A lilting song-and-dance
number at the conclusion of the Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN) meeting in
Manila said it all: the Pokhran nuclear tests had changed India's relationship with the
world and its Asia-Pacific neighbours. But India, despite its new status of "NAM
nuclear weapons state" -- as Indonesian Foreign Minister Ali Alatas once quipped --
remains an unthreatening neighbour. It is committed to a relationship that goes beyond
security to closer ties in the areas of investment, trade, culture and cooperation in
science and technology.
The Indian delegation to the fifth meeting of the ASEAN
Regional Forum (ARF), at which the ASEAN and its nine "dialogue partners" -- the
US, Russia, China, Japan, India, European Union, South Korea, Australia and New Zealand --
discussed security issues, was led by the prime minister's special envoy Jaswant Singh.
India had a dual purpose -- to use the ARF to articulate its nuclear concerns and the
Post-Ministerial Conference (PMC) to signal a larger strategic commitment with a region
which, despite its recent woes, is an economic dynamo. India's trade with the region
tripled from US$ 2 billion (Rs 8,400 crore) in 1992 to US$ 6 billion (Rs 25,200 crore) in
1996.
Philippines Foreign Minister Domingo L. Siazon Jr, who
chaired the ARF on July 27, said that the tests were "the most contentious issue in
our deliberations". The hawks led by Australia wanted an outright condemnation of
India, while most ASEAN members insisted that the forum should retain its character by
avoiding censure of a member.
Indian "nuclear diplomacy" and the ASEAN's desire
to ensure a balanced relationship with its large "dialogue partners" like China
and the US resulted in mild criticism of India. This, however, was offset by an insistence
that the P-5 countries fulfil obligations under the NPT to eliminate their nuclear
weapons. Alatas, representing a country that retains concerns about China, declared that
while he "deeply regretted" the Indian tests, there would always be incentive
for nations to cross the nuclear threshold as long as "double standards and hypocrisy
prevail".
Singh put across the Indian rationale for a "minimal
deterrent" and spelt out its future course of action -- possible adherence to the
test ban treaty, commitment to negotiate the fissile material cut-off treaty and a
no-first-use pledge. He also let the cat among the pigeons by offering to sign the South
East Asian Nuclear Weapons Free Zone (SEANWFZ) treaty. For the ASEAN to accept the offer
would mean accepting India as a "nuclear weapons state" but a rejection would
fatally compromise the SEANWFZ. Significantly, the ASEAN's efforts are being blocked by
the P-5, principally China.
Not surprisingly, Siazon paid repeated tributes to Singh's
ability to "articulate India's position very well" and said that as a result the
ASEAN now understood India's point of view.
The Indian participation could mark an intensification of the
"Look East" policy initiated by former prime minister P.V. Narasimha Rao in
1991. At the PMC, Singh conveyed India's offer to provide government-to-government credit
and counter-trade to help ASEAN overcome its economic problems. This has brought home to
the ASEAN the importance of India in stabilising their economies.
Though the ASEAN's concerns were at the centre of the
meetings, India had to work in a larger and more complex context -- the economic problems
of the region as well as the growing promiscuity of big-power relationships. A month after
its Beijing tango, the US appears to be embracing Russia. US Secretary of State Madeleine
Albright and Russian Foreign Minister Yevgenyi Primakov underlined this by addressing a
joint press conference after the ARF meeting and acting out this relationship in a skit at
the ministerial dinner the next day.
Through all this, India's main task was to calm the
post-Pokhran tremors. The US decision to let its backers, Australia, New Zealand and
Canada, take on India while sitting back and talking the language of negotiation is being
seen as a positive sign. The occasion also served to ease India's deadlock with its major
neighbour, China. Singh's hour-long meeting with Chinese Foreign Minister Tang Jiaxuan may
not have achieved anything significant, but it has cleared the air somewhat. Both sides
have confirmed the need to continue the dialogue, though Indian officials say they are not
sure whether China has yet overcome its Pokhran blues. Tang's speech at the ARF session
archly noted that instead of "creating imaginary enemies or fabricating sources of
threat", countries should realise that economic and social development were an easier
way "to move into the ranks of strong nations of the world".
Perhaps the greatest relief for the Indian diplomats was that
the 'K' word was scarcely mentioned. When asked whether the ASEAN would like to resolve
the Kashmir dispute, Siazon tartly replied, "We do not wish to involve ourselves in
Kashmir, it is outside our footprint. We'll leave it to some other braver country."
The ASEAN has shown great skill in weaving security concerns
and economic policy since its formation in 1965. This is obviously an area from which
India can learn a thing or two.
THE 'FUNPOLITIK'
The Indians, they said, were good, but the American-Russian
show-stopper starring Madeleine Albright (Maria) and Yevgenyi Primakov (as Yevgenyi) was
brilliant -- an East-West romantic spoof on the popular musical West Side Story.
The occasion: the customary song-and-dance skit at the concluding dinner at the ASEAN
ministerial meeting. East-West story. Excerpt:
Maria: Yevgenyi, I just met a boy named
Yevgenyi/And suddenly that name means no zero sum game for me.
Yevgenyi: I just met a girl named Madeleine Albright/And suddenly
I find, she thinks she'll change my mind for free.
Maria: My dear, they fired the whole cabinet but you're here /you
survived the last purge /you won't have to sing a dirge with me.
Yevgenyi: Madeleine Albright/ She's over the top but she's
alright/from Prague to Manila/She's stomped like Godzilla.
The theme probably began to ring in Jaswant Singh's mind in
the tedium of the flights to New York and Frankfurt. It was a song from a 1960 hit film
sung by Mukesh: Chodo kal ki baatein/kal ke baat purani/naye daur mein likhenge/mil kar
nayi kahani/hum Hindustani, hum Hindustani (Yesterday's events are now a part of the past.
In the new era, we Indians will build a new future together). But Mukesh's patriotic
rendering was far too straight for the song-and-dance skit, said South Block's brightest.
A team of high-level diplomats then sat down to weave the song to the new theme of India's
Pokhran tests. "Why such a fuss over a few crackers in the Thar", went the song,
"They weren't as loud as Nevada and Lop Nor/ Sherrif (Nawaz Sharif) took his ones and
joined the fun/ Evita (Albright) lost some sleep, Juan (Jiang Zemin) proliferated in the
sun." The song went on to extol Indo-ASEAN friendship: "We Hindustani with
you Aseani."
There was a quick improvisation too. Team leader Singh's
sense of humour could not be contained for long. After hearing the US-Russian duet, he
added one more line and rendered it in his own deep baritone voice: "Now that the
supers are over the top and can't bang any more/ It's the turn of the Hindustanis/ Hum
Hindustani, Hum Hindustani." All this talent led to a case of severe
stage-fright. Chinese Foreign Minister Tang Jiaxuan's hands shook visibly as he weakly
belted out a song, based on a Beijing Opera theme. |
|