RBI REPORT
Time to WorryThe central bank
doubts the Government's ability to meet budget targets. Is India heading for fiscal hell?
By Priya
Ramani
There's good news and there's bad news.
The good news is that the economy isn't in as bad a shape as you thought. The bad news is
that it's worse. The Reserve Bank of India's (RBI) Report on Currency and Finance
confirmed what doomsayers have been saying for a while now: the country's fiscal accounts
are in complete disarray. Growth targets for 1998-99 which were dubbed unrealistic now
look distinctly unachievable.
Naturally enough, the RBI would like to play down the
prospect of financial ruin but it comes through loud and clear. "The slow growth in
industry has clouded the prospect of achieving a rate of growth of 6 per cent,"
states the central bank's report tersely. Considering even the 6 per cent figure is a
rollback -- in its annual report released in August 1998, the apex bank had projected a
GDP growth of 6.5 per cent which was scaled down in October to 6 per cent -- the future is
looking distinctly grim.
So who's the culprit this time? The RBI report rounds up
the usual suspects -- excessive spending and insufficient revenues. Total expenditure
jumped up by a hefty 29 per cent against a target 13.9 per cent; the figure for the same
period last year: 16.6 per cent. More alarmingly, much of it is revenue expenditure which
is higher at 28.5 per cent; the 1998-99 budget had targeted a growth of just 15 per cent.
Receipts, on the other hand, plodded along, growing a meagre 11.7 per cent between April
and December compared with a projected 17 per cent hike.
It didn't help that Finance Minister Yashwant Sinha's much
talked-about disinvestment programme for public- sector enterprises turned out a damp
squib -- it was supposed to have raked in Rs 5,000 crore but barely managed Rs 225 crore.
Which is why borrowings went up.
According to the RBI, net borrowings by the government
between April and December 1998 were Rs 54,617 crore against an anticipated Rs 48,326
crore. In gross terms, the Government's borrowings crossed Rs 80,453 crore in just eight
months; it was expected to touch the market for up to Rs 79,376 crore. That means the
Government has been borrowing Rs 319 crore every day from April 1 to December 8,
scrambling to cover its current expenditure commitments. "The Government is borrowing
to finance its consumption needs," says Raghavendra Jha, an economist at the Indira
Gandhi Institute of Developmental Research. And that's a recipe for financial disaster.
What went wrong this time? Primarily, it is industry's
dismal growth that is to blame; it rose by a mere 3.6 per cent. This despite a rather
robust performance in electricity generation. Others factors were at work as well. The
slower growth of world trade hampered the country's exports, which recorded a pitiable
negative 5.1 per cent growth. It could have put pressure on the rupee. But that didn't
happen, thanks to low imports, a record low in crude-oil prices and foreign-exchange
reserves of nearly $30 billion (Rs 1,26,000 crore).
Still, it's not as if the country is not paying the price
-- literally -- for profligacy. Prices of primary articles went through the roof (remember
onions?) and the fear of double-digit inflation looms large: money supply's been growing
too fast (19.5 per cent year-on-year between April and November). The RBI report, too,
voices some concern at the growth of money supply, despite substantial increases in the
cash reserve ratio and short-term interest rates.
In fact, it's in part due to the RBI's money management
policies that interest rates have not firmed up. Jha believes that the increased pressure
of borrowing, combined with the desire to maintain the stability of the Indian rupee
against the dollar, will lead to a hardening of nominal interest rates in the coming six
months.
But what does all this mean in practical terms? For one,
analysts predict GDP growth will fall to the 4.5-5 per cent range while the fiscal deficit
will increase to anywhere between 6.2 per cent and a grimmer 7 per cent (budget estimates
had placed the deficit at about 5.6 per cent). Jardine Fleming India Broking Economist
Rohini Malkani believes the last figure is more likely, although the Government is likely
to window dress the figures to show about 6.5 per cent. She adds that there will be a
fiscal slippage of over Rs 20,000 crore.
Window dressing for the Government can take several forms,
from delaying refunds and paybacks from the oil-pool surplus account, buyback of PSU
shares by companies and financial institutions, to delaying the voluntary retirement
scheme and perhaps tinkering with non-planned expenditure. Of course, these are just
temporary measures which will merely carry over the problems to the next year. The wages
and interests bills, though, will continue to haunt the Government through this financial
year.
Interest costs are certainly nothing short of ghastly. At
present, the outstanding debt stock of the Government stands at a mammoth 53.9 per cent of
GDP; interest obligations, therefore, account for nearly 28 per cent of all fiscal
expenditure.
And given the present ratio of debt servicing to current
borrowings, in effect, for every Rs 100 that the Government borrows, it has to repay Rs
135. Points out Credit Rating and Investment Services India Ltd Managing Director R.
Ravimohan: "The interest burden is growing. It will continue to rise until government
debt is restructured. That cannot happen until huge divestments take place."
Clearly, then, the finance minister has some tough
decisions ahead. The BJP Government's second budget is due next month, and it's unlikely
to echo the last budget's blustering optimism. Sinha has some difficult choices ahead of
him -- he will need to find the least painful way of curbing expenses, at the same time
provide an impetus for growth.
His path seems clear: he needs to reduce the level of
public debt and find ways to fund infrastructure. Right now, capital expenditure accounts
for barely 21 per cent in the budget. But what do the analysts predict this time? Says
Jha: "We'll see a continued emphasis on investment in agriculture. There will also be
some temptation to increase import tariffs as industry is virtually crying out for
it."
Ambitious growth targets, too, are likely to make way for
some kind of restructuring of the food subsidy distribution network and a continued
emphasis on disinvestment. As Ravimohan puts it: "It's going to be a tough budget. It
needs to be tough to salvage the situation." The promised September revival didn't
happen in 1998. Unless Sinha acts, it's unlikely to happen in 1999 as well. |