BIHAR
The Winning HandVananchal seems headed for the cold storage as Laloo's "unified
Bihar" call gets cross-party support.
By Farzand Ahmed
and Sanjay Kumar Jha
Things have never looked so good for
Bihar supremo and Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) chief Laloo Prasad Yadav for a long, long
time. His wife Rabri Devi's Government has survived the Centre's efforts to dismiss it,
the RJD Government in the state has secured a vote of confidence in the Assembly and he
has managed to create a new emotive issue in the state -- a "unified Bihar".
Till just a few months back, Laloo was in jail for his
involvement in the multi-crore fodder scam and his political future seemed to be under a
cloud. But suddenly all the pieces have fallen into place -- just as he had planned.
When Laloo unexpectedly changed his mind on the creation of a
separate Vananchal state comprising 18 districts of southern Bihar, there was apprehension
that it would create a furore in the state. But protests against his rejection of
Vananchal were confined to the southern region where some supporters of a separate state
went on a rampage, erasing the word "Bihar" from every government signboard.
There are some, of course, who predict dire consequences. Says Congress chief whip in the
Assembly Furquan Ansari: "A mental division has been created. The way Laloo is trying
to instigate the people over the issue, there is danger of violence and
bloodletting." But Laloo seems unfazed. In fact, he has not only engineered the
support of the Assembly but also managed to rally MLAs from other political parties to the
idea of a "unified Bihar".
The reasons are not far to seek. To back his claim, Laloo has
raised the spectre of a Bihar minus Vananchal as a land of misery. Moreover,
anti-Vananchal lobbyists say it is not necessary to create a separate state to ensure a
region's development. Social anthropologist Sachchindra Narayan dismissed demands for
Vananchal as nothing more than a "political luxury". He argues that currently
there are as many as 16 ethnic movements in the country and the creation of one state
would lead to similar demands and subsequent street politics elsewhere. However, Mahendra
Singh, the CPI (ML) deputy leader in the Assembly, says, "RJD's opposition to
Vananchal was neither based on facts nor principle." The fact, he said, was that
Bihar as a whole hardly got much revenue from the southern region.
Laloo's volte face on Vananchal and the support he has
garnered from other parties have shaken the BJP, both in the state and at the Centre. The
state BJP realises that by arousing public emotion on the issue of a united Bihar, Laloo
could emerge as a "hero" just as he rode the crest of popularity in 1990 by
converting the issue of Mandal recommendation on reservation into a "social
justice" campaign and projecting himself as the messiah of the MYD
(Muslim-Yadav-Dalit) combine. The role he is seeking now is that of "saviour" of
Bihar.
Laloo's political machinations apart, there is some truth in
the apprehensions that the bifurcation of the state would cripple Bihar economically.
Northern and central Bihar are as different from the south as chalk and cheese. The
south's Chhotanagpur plateau is rich in minerals and boasts of several industries; the
northern and central regions have some moribund sugar and jute mills and are completely
dependent on agriculture. The southern plateau accounts for about 63 per cent of the
state's revenue from mineral resources and 27.27 per cent of all the minerals produced in
the country. Take away Jharkhand and the state's share would be a meagre 0.47 per cent. It
is this fear of the people of Bihar that Laloo is capitalising on.
With his double-edged sword, Laloo has cut the political
parties in the state in half. The Congress was the first casualty of the north-south
divide when sharp differences surfaced in the state unit over the issue of support to the
Vananchal Bill. At an acrimonious Congress Legislature Party meeting last month a majority
of the MLAs from north and central Bihar were not willing to toe the CWC resolution
endorsing the Vananchal Bill.
Even RJD is facing a revolt from the leaders of south Bihar.
Former minister and senior RJD leader Karamchand Bhagat has resigned the post of
vice-president and one of the ministers Akalu Ram Mahato too has not only threatened to
quit the ministry, but also called a meeting of all pro-Vananchal legislators and MPs at
Bokaro on October 2 to demonstrate their unity.
Laloo is obviously counting on the fact that there are only
27 per cent tribals in the proposed Vananchal region. His game plan includes pitting
tribals against non-tribals and turning the tide of public opinion against the BJP for
supporting Vananchal. Laloo himself is confident that his new plank would demolish the
BJP-Samata Party combine in the event of elections. "People of Bihar will never
forget those who tried to dismember it," he says.
But as BJP General Secretary Saryu Rai says, "The Centre
has enough constitutional power to bifurcate any state and there is no hurdle in the
creation of Vananchal now. The recent assembly drama is also meaningless." However
with the state Assembly having already rejected it, the Vananchal Bill could well end up
as yet another casualty of politicking, just as several other well-intentioned bills have
been in the past. |