POLITICAL FALLOUT
Sniper FireFor the political
parties, the Kargil war is an electoral battle by other means.
By Javed
M Ansari and Saba N Bhaumik
Confronted with a crisis of any magnitude, the political class instinctively
smells opportunity. So it was with the war in Kargil. Last Tuesday, as the Congress
Working Committee (CWC) met hurriedly to discuss the battle in the mountains, some
over-zealous party supporters carted an inflatable replica of Atal Bihari Vajpayee's
famous bus to Lahore through the streets of Delhi.
To drive home the abrupt end of this latest bout of bhai-bhai
diplomacy, the bus was shown having turned turtle. This imaginative agitprop won instant
brownie points among the party faithful and even made it to some front pages. The public
reaction, however, wasn't as forthcoming. With TV channels beaming sombre pictures of
soldiers returning home in coffins, the Congress leadership quickly gauged the grim
implications of being seen indulging in one-upmanship games at a time of national crisis.
Within a few hours of the CWC meeting, the overturned bus lay in a deflated heap.
The deflation was overdue. When the first news of the audacious Pakistani
move to redraw the Line of Control trickled in, the Congress reacted with characteristic
oppositional aggression, perhaps to make up for the criticism that the AICC session on May
25 was too concerned with Sonia Gandhi to even take note of the border war. On May 28, a
Congress delegation called on President K.R. Narayanan demanding an extraordinary Rajya
Sabha session. More to the point, the party's head of the external affairs department, K.
Natwar Singh, made it his mission to target Defence Minister George Fernandes and, by
association, the BJP-led caretaker government for a vicious bout of tongue-lashing.
"Inko chullu bhar paani mein doob marna chahiye (They should drown themselves),"
he said in a rare burst of colloquialism. Fernandes drew the Congress' ire not merely on
account of his role in the dismissal of Admiral Vishnu Bhagwat as naval chief but because
of his role in persuading Mulayam Singh Yadav to oppose Sonia's candidature after the fall
of the Vajpayee regime. Even as the Congress formally committed itself to supporting the
government's attempts to repel the invaders, the CWC hit out at the
"coordinationless, cohesiveless, careless caretaker government." In various
parts of the country, Youth Congress activists burnt effigies of Vajpayee and Fernandes.
Governing the Congress' initial stridency was the sign of
confusion in the BJP. Rattled by the all-round belief of a monumental intelligence failure
and the accusation that Vajpayee was literally taken for a ride by the Pakistanis in
Lahore, the BJP didn't react with its customary jingoism. Apart from General Secretary
Narendra Modi's boast that the invaders wouldn't be fed biryani -- a reference to the 1993
siege of Hazratbal in Srinagar -- the BJP's response to the Kargil conflict was distinctly
tepid, verging on confusion.
The confusion was understandable. Having attached great faith
in the Lahore bus journey establishing the government's "friendship with
firmness" policy, the party was disoriented by the disappearance of one electoral
plank and the erosion of another -- national security. So profound was the disorientation
that even the government's sharp response in ordering airstrikes against the invaders
wasn't seized upon politically.
Instead, the BJP has expended much of its time either
defending the self goals by its ally Fernandes or trying to rediscover its pre-Lahore
bellicosity with the aid of a controversial briefing on the Kargil situation by army
officers. Home Minister L.K. Advani helped the party recover its composure somewhat by
devoting his campaign speeches in Goa to reiterating his hardline position and attacking
the Congress for its alleged ambivalence in this hour of crisis. But even then, the party
is treading very cautiously, unsure of how the entire Kargil episode will unfold. Says
General Secretary M. Venkiah Naidu: "The Kargil crisis will definitely have a
political fallout. People will be watching every move by politicians and will punish those
who blatantly try to take advantage of the situation."
Maybe it is the realisation that no one has emerged unscathed
from the conflict in the mountains that has forced all the parties to get their act
together and appear more responsible. Sonia called on Vajpayee without any fanfare and
neither side was willing to give details. Last Friday, Congress spokesman Kapil Sibal
changed the tone of the party by urging the government to mount a diplomatic offensive to
expose Pakistani designs on Indian territory. Sibal even sidestepped the issue of
Fernandes, "Let bygones be bygones." On his part, the defence minister withdrew
his controversial suggestion of according "safe passage" to the invaders. And
BJP Vice-President K.L. Sharma made it clear that his party would not use Kargil as an
election issue.
That, of course, is certain to be an assurance that will not
be kept. Even as both sides have detected the growing outrage at the deaths of Indian
soldiers, they are hoping that the fury will be directed at Pakistan rather than the
politicians. Vajpayee, in particular, is taking exceptional care to be measured,
circumspect and very prime ministerial in his approach. While maintaining his tough
rhetoric, he hasn't disowned his earlier bus diplomacy altogether. His belief is that
sooner, rather than later, either good sense or sustained international pressure will
force Pakistan to distance itself from an adventurist course in Kashmir. When that happens
-- and Vajpayee hopes it will happen before September -- he hopes to play the peace card
yet again. This time amid the backdrop of a nuclear India that takes no nonsense yet
values peace.
The government may not have come out with flying colours from
the Kargil conflict but Vajpayee's reputation remains intact. This could yield returns if
the BJP succeeds in transforming the election into a presidential contest. Sonia knows
this. For her, hope lies in conducting herself with dignity and responsibility. And
letting the Vajpayee government make a complete hash of the war. |