| Oh Shut
Up George A defence minister gone
berserk with his tongue.
Even for his habitual supporters, Defence
Minister George Fernandes has crossed a Rubicon of sorts with a flurry of irresponsible
utterances on the war in Kargil. First, he confounded the most hardnosed Islamabad watcher
by insisting that the recent invasion was an autonomous operation of the Pakistan Army.
Having absolved Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif as well as the infamous Inter-Services
Intelligence (ISI) of all blame, Fernandes then spoke of a "safe passage" to the
infiltrators. In between his breathtaking pronouncements, he led a team of generals to a
meeting of the BJP's National Executive, making a mockery of the apolitical identity of
India's armed forces. His respect for propriety apart, the defence minister's grasp of
realpolitik and military strategy is under scrutiny. His analysis of Pakistan's power
structure is questionable. Sharif is arguably the most powerful civilian ruler of his
country since M.A. Jinnah, having only a few months ago replaced the army chief with a
personal favourite. Surely he must know what his military brass is doing. The distinction
between the army and the ISI is equally specious.
Nor is any talk of compromise with and unhindered withdrawal
of the mujahideen tenable. It will only serve to confuse and frustrate those who are
putting their lives at stake in Kargil's treacherous terrain. The Indian soldier is not a
robotic entity, to be switched on and off as per a politician's whimsy. It was precisely
such confused signals that impaired the Indian Army in Sri Lanka a decade ago. Fernandes
is walking down the same route that led Rajiv Gandhi to disaster. Only the truly cretinous
would demand a defence minister be sacked in the midst of war. Even so, Fernandes has to
muzzle himself and stop lumbering from one controversy to the next. There is a fine divide
between defence and foreign affairs; he has made it a habit to breach it. Like the
Pakistanis, Fernandes has got to learn the virtues of a line of control.
Postpone Your Politics
Can't the Congress stop its one-upmanship games till
Kargil has been saved?
Late in the life of the 12th Lok Sabha, somebody
remarked that the Congress had 140-odd MPs and 500 aspiring ministers. What was once
India's natural party of governance is today a zoological delight: it is the world's
largest collection of know-alls. Nothing sums up this sentiment better than the Congress'
reaction to Kargil. Having paid the mandatory tribute to the Indian Army, Congress leaders
have resorted to scoring cheap political points. They have expended their energies in
gloating over the "tattered remains" of the Lahore Declaration and lampooning
Atal Bihari Vajpayee's "bus diplomacy". One particularly imaginative partyman
has gone to the extent of comparing Vajpayee's diplomacy to Neville Chamberlain's trip to
Munich in 1938. Amazingly, till the other day he was likening the BJP leadership to
Hitler.
Of course, it is K. Natwar Singh who's taken the biscuit. The
one-time diplomat and foreign minister obviously thinks his office as chairman of the
Congress' external affairs cell entitles him to play the expert commentator on anything
and everything. So he has accused the government of lacking "coherence, direction and
an integrated approach", charged it with having "let down the jawans",
predicted that the crisis would go to the United Nations in September, asked why the
National Security Council has not met. The coup de grace came when he justified
his words and deeds by pointing out how a no-confidence motion was moved against Winston
Churchill during World War II. Since the Congress has demanded a Rajya Sabha session -- to
analyse a war even while it is taking place -- presumably Natwar and his colleagues want
to move a no-confidence motion against a caretaker government. If only the Congress could
desist from playing ducks and drakes till the enemy has been vanquished. |