URBAN AFFAIRS MINISTRY
Battering RamJethmalani strips Secretary Aggarwal of authority in an attempt to defang the
adversarial IAS lobby.
By Sayantan Chakravarty
In his long innings as a lawyer and
politician, Urban Affairs Minister Ram Jethmalani has built himself a reputation for being
a pugnacious opponent. The latest to feel the heat is Kiran Aggarwal, secretary in
Jethmalani's ministry.
The impetuous Jethmalani recently stripped Aggarwal, an IAS
officer from Haryana, of virtually all her powers. She lost control of the prized Housing
Department. She even found herself turfed out of the Delhi Metro Railway Corporation
(DMRC), of which she was ex officio chairman. Both jobs went to her number two, Special
Secretary S.S. Chattopadhyay. Aggarwal was left with such exalted tasks as arranging night
shelter for pavement dwellers in Union territories.
Actually, it was the DMRC which was at the root of the
conflict. Estimated at Rs 23,000 crore, the scheme to build an underground railway network
in Delhi is the single largest project in Indian history. Naturally, it has the word
"lucrative" written all over it. In May, as a first step, the DMRC appointed
Japan's Pacific Consultants International (PCI) as general consultant to the project. The
general consultant's role is vital. It will choose the firm which will finally execute the
project.
In August, Jethmalani studied the relevant papers and
decided PCI's selection hadn't been transparent enough. He blamed Aggarwal and E.
Sreedharan, managing director, DMRC, for bypassing a concerned committee headed by the
cabinet secretary and hastily issuing PCI an appointment letter. He also accused them of
keeping from him important DMRC documents from him and of accepting without a murmur PCI's
demand of a Rs 440 crore fee.
Jethmalani wrote to the prime minister recommending the CBI
look into the matter. Simultaneously, he ordered the process of finding a general
consultant be gone through afresh. Meanwhile, PCI sent word to the ministry slashing its
fee to Rs 208 crore.
By the end of the month, the bureaucracy had hit back. On
August 27, officials in the Urban Affairs Ministry apparently gave Subramanian Swamy --
Janata Party president and the BJP Government's chief critic -- access to papers relating
to the M.S. Shoes case. Immediately, Swamy charged Jethmalani with wrongly restoring a
"frozen" four-star hotel project on Delhi's Khel Gaon Marg -- Swamy put its
value at Rs 350 crore -- to M.S. Shoes. Swamy claimed "a well-known fund-raiser of
the BJP, close to the PMO, was behind the move".
The story of the four-star hotel has all the twists and
turns of a soap opera. In October 1994, the Housing and Urban Development Corporation
(HUDCO) -- which falls under the Urban Affairs Ministry -- invited bids for a building
which could be converted into a 363-room hotel.
Pawan Sachdeva -- the chairman of M.S. Shoes who was later
embroiled in a stock market scandal -- offered Rs 100 crore, the highest bid. He paid Rs
40 crore soon after and took charge of the building. However, his acquisition turned out
to be worthless. The structure HUDCO had built hadn't received a completion certificate
from municipal authorities. Nor were electricity, water and sewage lines in place.
An angry Sachdeva refused to pay HUDCO subsequent
instalments till it got the clearances. It still hasn't. Instead, HUDCO cancelled M.S.
Shoes' contract on January 1, 1996. Sachdeva went to court and won. HUDCO appealed before
the Delhi High Court, where the matter rests.
In June this year, Jethmalani called for the M.S. Shoes
file and said that the company "be given a fair deal by the Government".
Aggarwal objected on two counts. One, the contract being worth over Rs 50,000, it would
require the Finance Ministry's approval. Two, it would be injudicious to talk to M.S.
Shoes while a court case was pending.
Jethmalani dismissed these as technicalities. M.S. Shoes
cannot be penalised for the "incompetence of HUDCO", he thundered. Aggarwal and
the other officials were now doubly miffed. As it is two of the minister's personal
assistants were running riot. Next, Jethmalani had his own set of priorities, which
clearly did not match those of the civil servants. The simmering discontent found
expression through Swamy.
Jethmalani's counter-attack was sharp. He reduced Aggarwal
to a lame duck secretary, demanded a CBI inquiry against her for leaking papers and
dismissed Swamy as a "moral leper" and "master at telling monstrous
lies". This round to the minister. |