





|
Catching
The Bus Recognising that the ride to
Pakistan doesn't need an American navigator.
At first sight, Prime Minister Atal
Bihari Vajpayee's proposed trip to Pakistan on the inaugural run of the Delhi-Lahore bus
service may appear to be an extension of the "feel good" period of
Indo-Pakistani relations characterised by the current cricket Test series. But to see it
this way would be a grave error. In diplomacy, as in cricket, deftness and timing are
everything. The applause that Vajpayee's announcement has evoked both in India and
Pakistan, if not the world, speaks for itself, as does the sudden change in the tenor of
statements and declarations from both sides. As Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif has indicated,
Pakistan is willing to discuss everything, including the compellingly urgent nuclear
issue, bilaterally. Effectively choreographed, Vajpayee and Sharif's pas de deux could
have portentous consequences for the tangled relationship between the two countries. The
Lahore trip may appear to be a logical and simple gesture, but Vajpayee deserves credit
for taking up Sharif's offer with such promptness. Just how difficult the decision may
have been can be gauged from the fact that no Indian prime minister has visited Pakistan
since 1989.
While the goodwill that will come from a
Vajpayee trip and a return Sharif visit to Delhi is a useful end in itself, the main gain
will be in breathing life into the moribund official-level dialogue between the two
countries. Last October, after much hand-wringing, India and Pakistan resumed their
official-level talks on Kashmir and peace and security issues in Islamabad and followed
them up with six rounds on other festering subjects. The process was, however, confined to
restating positions that the two sides had taken in the past. Next week, Indian and
Pakistani officials are slated to resume the process. Till Vajpayee's dramatic gesture,
the chances of the talks gaining momentum were fairly slim. With the two heads of
government deciding to take assertive action, the situation has changed.
What stands out starkly, however, is the swiftness with
which the climate of Indo-Pakistan relations changes. Through most of last year, Pakistani
artillery shelled Indian positions on the Line of Control in a bid to escalate tensions.
In fact, at times, traffic to Leh on National Highway 1A was forced to move at night as
though in war time. Simultaneously, Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence stepped up its
efforts to revive the flagging militancy in Kashmir by pumping in more mercenaries and
guns.
Despite the current tone of sweet reasonableness, the range
of Pakistan's India policy remains narrow, veering from hostility to suspicion and the
psychotic demand for Kashmir. On the other hand, since the V.P. Singh government of
1989-90, India's policy has been informed by the belief that a stable, secure and
prosperous Pakistan is vital for this country. That perhaps explains why Vajpayee's
gesture has found ready support in India, as indeed did his hard-line against those who
wanted to disrupt the ongoing cricket matches. It is also the reason why Delhi has focused
on trying to persuade Pakistan to lower barriers on trade and people-to-people contact.
Despite a mountain of evidence of Pakistani complicity in acts of terrorism across the
country, India has tried to keep alive a pretence that all is well with the neighbour.
Given the history, the India-Pakistan agenda is a vast one.
Top of the list is the need to settle outstanding disputes, including Kashmir. Anyone with
an iota of knowledge of history knows that Kashmir is not the cause of the India-Pakistan
quarrel, but an occasion for it. In this context, India's call for a process that starts
with resolving less ticklish issues like Sir Creek and Siachen, building confidence of the
two countries to tackle other problems and then moving on to the toughest one, Kashmir,
makes eminent sense.
Yet both sides must recognise that after the Pokhran and
Chagai tests, the nuclear issue has assumed primacy. Islamabad's frenetic behaviour in the
days leading up to the Chagai test is a pointer to the need for both sides to adopt a
defence posture that is not on a hair-trigger. Movement in this area is important if both
countries want the world to resume normal relations with them. In the October talks, India
offered a range of confidence-building measures that were spurned by Islamabad, which
somewhat unrealistically sought a "strategic restraint regime" -- a concept
designed to give Pakistan parity with India, even though it is roughly a quarter of
India's size. Now with Washington seemingly reconciled to Delhi's aim of creating a
credible but minimum nuclear deterrent, Sharif has changed his tune. One swallow, it has
been said, does not a summer make, but in the tension-ridden relations between the two
nuclear-armed subcontinental neighbours, the smallest of friendly gestures is welcome. |