The outcome of the twelfth Lok Sabha election reveals the
changing nature of Indian politics. The enthusiasm with which the people have embraced the
democratic process, with a rise in turnout for the first time in a mid-term poll, shows
that politics is no longer a middle-class game. A hung Parliament for the fourth
successive election confirmed that we have long passed the age of national verdicts. The
national picture is just a sum total of state-level verdicts.
The spectacular rise of the BJP combine marks the '90s out to be a decade of political
realignment. It also brings home the truth that the path to power in this society lies in
the creation of political, regional and social alliances.
BJP: Alliances Pay Dividends
BJP+
Seat gain
+63
Seats (1998): 250 |
Allies made a
crucial difference
(Number of seats)
1991 BJP 120 Allies 4
1996 BJP 161 Allies 26
1998 BJP 177 Allies 73 |
Uneven performance in strongholdsGains (%age of
votes)
UP: 2.9
Bihar: 3.8
Losses (%age of votes)
Haryana: -23.9
Rajasthan: -2.6 |
Vote (%): 36.2
Swing: +11.9 |
Percentage of votes1991 BJP 20 Allies 0.8
1991 BJP 20.3 Allies 4
1991 BJP 25 Allies 11.2 |
Spectacular gains in the coastal belt1996:
Votes (%) 8.6 Seats 7
1998
Votes (%) 31.2 Seats 72 |
The BJP with its allies has emerged as the largest vote-getter in the
country, the first time any party or combine has overtaken the Congress in this respect.
Although in 1996, it managed to squeeze a few more votes which made it the largest party
in terms of seats, it appeared stuck at around 20 per cent of the vote share, and even
with allies could not reach the 25 per cent mark. In 1998, BJP's success is much more
apparent. It has broken the 25 per cent barrier in its own right, and the allies add a
crucial 6 per cent to the total.
The major change in the fortunes of the BJP stems from the alliances that have helped
it break out of its central Indian heartland and into the south and east where previously
it struggled to make an impact. In an area stretching from the southern states of
Karnataka, Kerala and Tamil Nadu up the eastern coastal belt through Andhra Pradesh and
Orissa to West Bengal, strategic alliances have seen the party make major gains both in
terms of votes and seats.
In 1996, the BJP secured merely 9 per cent votes in this region, and a meagre seven
seats. This election has seen the BJP front emerge as the dominant player, with 31 per
cent of the vote and a total of 72 seats: a quarter of the total up for grabs. In these
seven states the vote swing to the BJP alliance was 22 per cent, compared to 4 per cent in
the rest of the country. The BJP takes a smaller share of the seats won by the allies in
all these states apart from Karnataka, but its gains add up to a substantial total and
enhance its credibility as a contender for government. Overall, the swing to the BJP on
its own was 5 per cent.
The gains in the southern and eastern coastal belt far outweighs the fluctuating
fortunes in states which were BJP strongholds. Big anti-incumbency swings in Rajasthan,
Haryana and Maharashtra -- where in recent elections it has done well -- weakened the
party.
In Uttar Pradesh the BJP gained marginally, helped by the three-way split in the
opposition parties. There is also some evidence that the party gained from the attempt to
overthrow the Kalyan Singh Government: the first round of voting saw a swing of 1.9 per
cent to the BJP in Uttar Pradesh, which increased to 4.4 per cent in the second round.
Congress: Clinging on where it can
Congress
Seat loss
-1
Seats (1998): 140 |
Losing its national spreadGains (%age of votes)
Maharahstra: 14.6
Assam: 5.8
Losses: (%age of votes)
West Bengal: -25.5
Tamil Nadu: -21.5 |
Lost during the polling
Swing during first phase: + 1.6
Swing during second phase: -2.1
Swing during third phase: -4.5 |
Vote (%): 25.4
Swing (%): -3.4 |
Heavier
losses in
Urban seats: -3.6
SC seats: -3.9
...but gain in
ST seats: +2.2 |
For a party that brought down the UF government and led the nation to
these elections, the Congress has very little to show by way of gains. As of now, it has
one seat less than what it had in the last Parliament. Its vote share has once again
fallen to a historical low of 25.4 per cent.
Optimists in the party can point to the fact that it still gets more votes than any
other single party, and that its tally has gone up to 166, if one includes the Rashtriya
Janata Dal (RJD). But that's hardly a consolation. The fact is that the BJP contested
fewer seats than the Congress and yet managed about the same number of votes. And the RJD
is hardly an ally the Congress can bank on.
The 1998 election results show that it is not just the influence of dramatic political
events that can swing the result over the multiple stages of the election, but a more
gradual change in the national mood. In the beginning of February the Sonia wave was at
its apex, but each successive round of the election saw people less likely to vote for
Congress and the swing to the BJP getting larger.
Of course, it is impossible to quantify the exact number of votes that the frantic
campaign by Sonia added to the Congress total, but looking at the most obvious measure --
the change in votes in the 141 constituencies where she campaigned compared to the rest of
the country -- shows that the Sonia factor did play a part in boosting Congress'
prospects. Where Sonia appeared there was 3 per cent swing to Congress, while in the
constituencies she bypassed the swing went 3 per cent against the party.
In Uttar Pradesh the decline of the Congress party is such that it could not even hold
on to Amethi, the Nehru-Gandhi bastion in the state. Like other parties, Congress suffered
in states where it was in power, losing in Himachal Pradesh, Orissa, Madhya Pradesh and
Gujarat. Supporters of Sharad Pawar will point to the gains made in Maharashtra, where a
strategic alliance with the Republican Party of India and the Samajwadi Party effectively
beat the BJP-Shiv Sena alliance at its own game.
In Kerala the long standing partnership of the UDF gives Congress a stable base from
which to fight in the state. Perhaps there lies a lesson for the Congress.
United Front
Seat loss: -76
Seats (1998): 98 |
Left stood its ground
1996
Votes (%): 9.1
Seats: 51
1998
Votes (%): 7.7
Seats: 48 |
Erosion of regional parties
1996
Votes (%): 11.4
Seats: 77
1998
Votes (%): 10.0
Seats: 44 |
Vote (%): 20.9
Swing: -7.7 |
|
Near wipe-out for Janata Dal
1996
Votes (%): 8.1
Seats: 46
1998
Votes (%): 3.2
Seats: 6 |
The Left Front comes out of the election as the largest block in the UF,
winning a total of 48 seats. In West Bengal the party saw a 3 per cent fall in its share
of votes. But this was not reflected in the number of seats won, with the Front holding on
to 48 seats. The defection of Mamata Banerjee meant that the opposition was divided, and
the BJP-Trinamool Congress gained mainly at the Congress' expense. In Kerala, a straight
two-way fight with the UDF saw a loss to the Left of only one seat.
The regional parties had mixed fortunes: humiliation in Tamil Nadu, big losses in Assam
and a relatively respectable outcome for the TDP in Andhra Pradesh. In all these states an
anti-incumbency movement amongst the electorate can be seen to have led to losses in votes
and seats. The Samajwadi Party fought a tough campaign against the BJP in Uttar Pradesh,
and modest gains illustrate the solidity of Mulayam Singh Yadav's support.
For the Janata Dal, the member of the UF with most seats after 1996 and provider of the
last two prime ministers, the result was almost unremitting devastation. Riven by splits
and destructive rivalries, the party was almost wiped out in Karnataka, Orissa, Bihar and
Uttar Pradesh. It is virtually non-existent in most of the states in the north and the
west. The party built its success on a solid block of OBC votes, and the loss of this vote
base to both the BJP and breakaway parties left the Janata Dal weak and isolated.