UTTAR PRADESH
Back to the PastThe state BJP Government tries to revive the temple issue by erecting a
memorial to "Ayodhya martyrs".
By Farzand
Ahmed
Rajajipuram,
located in the heart of Lucknow, has all of a sudden turned into another pilgrimage centre
for Ram bhakts. On the night of October 30, amid much fanfare, Uttar Pradesh Urban
Development Minister Lalji Tandon unveiled a towering black granite-and-marble memorial
inside a small roundabout to glorify the "martyrdom" of the Kothari brothers --
Ram Kumar (21) and Sharad (19) of Calcutta -- who died in police firing during the kar
seva in Ayodhya on October 30 and November 2, 1990.
"The brothers had sacrificed their lives for the
construction of the Ram mandir at Ayodhya. The memorial will inspire the young generation
and remind the people that state power can never deter the brave from achieving their
goals," thundered Tandon.
Controversy soon erupted, primarily over the decision of the
city municipal corporation -- the Lucknow Nagar Nigam (LNN) -- to erect a memorial. Mayor
S.C. Roy defended the memorial, saying "the two brothers had laid down their lives at
a tender age for a noble cause and since the people of the area wanted to cherish their
martyrdom, the LNN, an autonomous body, had constructed it".
Predictably, the Opposition was up in arms. State Samajwadi
Party chief Ram Sharan Das called it yet another "criminal act" of the BJP
Government to glorify those whose actions led to communal violence and social
disturbances. Das also declared that if his party returned to power in the state it would
demolish all symbols of communal hatred. Congress Legislature Party leader Pramod Tiwary
described the memorial as "shameful", saying it was improper to build monuments
in the name of those killed while violating the Constitution and law. In reply, Tandon
argues, "Unarmed people dying for their faith are martyrs."
What has also raised the hackles of the opposition parties is
the timing of the memorial -- coming as it does in the wake of the nation-wide debate over
the Centre's subtle attempt to "Indianise and nationalise" the education system
in the country. Many see the move as yet another ploy to further communalise the state and
use it as a laboratory for the implementation of the RSS' hidden agenda.
The Opposition's fears are not totally unfounded. Already,
several controversial moves are underway in Uttar Pradesh: a number of textbooks and
proposed reading material was being drafted by the Sangh Parivar with the aim of
inculcating Hindu religious consciousness and pride among schoolchildren; a new series of
class VI textbooks -- called Sanskar Saurav -- contains a chapter titled "The Martyrs
of November 2"; Chief Minister Kalyan Singh's Government is all set to overhaul
primary education in the state from the next academic session and for a start has
introduced the recitation of Saraswati Vandana and Vande Mataram in government-run primary
and junior high schools.
However, murmurs of protest have started even within Kalyan's
coalition ministry. Minority Welfare Minister Raja Ghazanffar Ali Khan -- the lone Muslim
minister, belonging to the Jantantrik BSP -- felt that recitation of Saraswati Vandana and
Vande Mataram "hurts the sentiments of other communities, especially Muslims".
But Minister of State for Basic Education Ravindra Shukla brushes aside such protests
saying, "We have not made this compulsory in minority institutions and missionary
schools." Many see in this a clear message to those who didn't like the Vandana to
withdraw their wards from government schools and enrol them in minority institutions.
Even as the debate over the glorification of Ayodhya
"martyrs" and recitation of Saraswati Vandana and Vande Mataram rages, a new
controversy has erupted in Ayodhya itself. This one centres on the Faizabad Municipality's
move to restrict burial to just two graveyards in Ayodhya. Babri Action Committee Convener
Zafaryab Jilani sees it as yet another attempt by the Sangh Parivar to harass and
humiliate Muslims in the area. If the Government failed to intervene before it was too
late, he warned, the situation might turn ugly. |