





|
Danse
Macabre Don't let Srikrishna
become another Jain. Else Mumbai will never be at peace with itself
Less than a year after the Jain Commission's first
report became a political football, a similar fate threatens the Srikrishna Commission's
findings. Justice B.N. Srikrishna's inquiry into the post-Babri Masjid violence in Mumbai
-- two bouts of religious bloodletting culminating in the bomb blasts of March 1993 -- has
broadly identified what it considers the culpable factors. It has pointed fingers at,
among others, Bal Thackeray and an allegedly prejudiced city police. It is nobody's case
that the report must please all people. However, what can be expected is a measured
response, especially from the Maharashtra Government. Instead, the Shiv Sena-led regime's
reaction has been little short of hysterical -- and illogical. It has been most selective
in its acceptance of the report. When Srikrishna blames the "effete" Congress
government of the day, the Sena gleefully concurs. When Srikrishna trains his guns on
Thackeray, he becomes "anti-Maharashtra ... and anti-Hindu".
Actually, the fault doesn't lie with the Sena alone. The
original sin is the politicisation of all commissions of inquiry. If the Sena is guilty of
fanning chauvinism today, the United Front was similarly to blame when it called the Jain
report "anti-Tamil". Justice M.C. Jain's passing acquaintance with the English
language became the excuse for diverting attention from the substance of his work,
fanciful as it may have been. Now the entire charade is set to be repeated with Justice
Srikrishna. Rather than discuss the lessons of the crazed winter of 1992-93, the Sena and
its rivals are exchanging invectives over one individual. The issue is not Thackeray; the
issue is dispensing punishment where it is due and enhancing civic security in India's
richest metropolis. The Mumbai riots were not just another law and order problem. They
were a national shame. As such, it would be in order for the Union Home Ministry to call
for the report and supervise any follow-up action itself.
Year That Was
Free India marked its golden jubilee in a most forgettable fashion
To recall Jawaharlal Nehru's immortal imagery, in
1947, as the world slept, India awoke to "life and freedom". Over the past 12
months, as the world celebrated the golden jubilee of the epochal event, India slept.
Truly, India has marked the 50th birthday of its independence with an extraordinary
blandness. The rest of the world usually begins such festivities on the 49th anniversary
and takes them to a climax on the 50th. India -- civilisation's eternal contrarion --
decided to be different and commenced the celebrations on the 50th birthday. Initially, it
was sought to be justified in terms of ancient Hindu concepts of chronology. In reality,
the bureaucrats had simply forgotten to plan. This nonchalance has been evident every
single day since August 15, 1997. On that day itself, there was a spontaneity to the
Indians' expression of pride in his or her nation. It was best manifested by A.R. Rahman's
evocative rendering of Ma tujhe salaam, watched and heard by thousands in Delhi and tens
of thousands on television.
Despite the usual fumbling, the inaugural had been
propitious. After that it was all downhill. The passion, the energies and the sheer
patriotism of the people of India were waiting to be harnessed after that magical August
night a year ago. If the government failed to do so, it has only itself to blame. India
will remember -- or prefer to forget -- its golden year as one in which legislators broke
all vows of decorous behaviour, elections were viciously violent, economic indices sought
new depths and Justice M.C. Jain did to judicial investigations what Jack the Ripper did
to after-dinner strolls. True, there was the brilliance of Sachin Tendulkar, the
scientific success of Pokhran. Yet, all of this may have occurred in any ordinary year.
India will leave no distinctive stamp on this special one. Anyhow, tomorrow is another
day; there's still 2047 to look forward to. |