India Today Editorials

METRO TODAY   |   DAILY NEWS   |   ASTROLOGY   |   ARCHIVES    |   INDIA TODAY    |  HOME

India Today issue dt November 1, 1999
Nov 1, 1999

Cover Story

Nation

States

Columns

Newsnotes

From the
Editor in Chief


Editorials

Eyecatchers

Voices

Living

Interview of the week

Neighbours

Profile

Sports

Books

Offtrack

Bodyline

Centrestage

Faces of the Millennium

Issue Contents

Visitor From the Vatican

Those who want to disrupt the Pope's trip are damaging India

EditorialEarly next month Pope John Paul II arrives in India for a visit that has already caused more commotion than it should have. The Pope bears the fairly unique status of being both religious leader of the Catholic Church and temporal head of the Vatican City. As such, his visit is as much that of a head of state as of a spiritual figure. The protests against the Pope, largely articulated by the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) and its affiliates, seek to make two points. One, the Pope should apologise for the Inquisition in Goa from the 16th century onwards. Two, the Pope should curb missionary activities in India and state that "all religions are equal and Christianity is not the only path to salvation". The argument having been made, the matter should have rested there. Instead a "Goa-Delhi Jagran Yatra" is afoot, there are fears of vociferous crowds being gathered near the Pope's functions -- and of India making a global spectacle of itself.

The broad issues the VHP has raised are questionable. The oppression of Hindus by Portuguese Catholics is a historical fact. Nevertheless, the business of seeking an apology stretches the realms of logic. Irrespective of whether or not the Church has similarly said sorry to Jews, it is worth asking if such attempts to undo the past serve any purpose. If they did earthlings would spend the rest of their lives apologising to each other -- Hindus to Buddhists, Britons to Indians, Belgians to Zaireans, Romans to Greeks. An apology is a self-generated impulse. It does not behove a society with such strong moorings to go about demanding one. As for the contemporary conversion controversy, it is already a matter of intense public debate. The VHP -- indeed, any Indian -- has the right to an opinion and to express it before the Pope. While that end is unexceptionable, the means are equally important. The VHP's methods, unfortunately, are those of an inhospitable host. Whatever else they may be, they are not rooted in Indian tradition.


Peace and in Our Time

India should nudge the US towards nuclear disarmament

EditsDepending on how you see it, the rejection of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT) by the US Senate is either a vindication or a roadblock. President Bill Clinton, who laid so much store on getting the CTBT ratified by India and Pakistan, will now have to begin anew. Delhi and Islamabad can breathe easier. The politically complicated business of deciding upon what to do with CTBT can now be postponed. Scoring points in diplomacy is a most welcome proposition but perhaps the issue would be better served if India scored points with a purpose. With Clinton clearly on the backfoot, what with his much-vaunted global nuclear regime in jeopardy, India is well-placed to bargain. More than CTBT, what will worry the White House is the impending Fissile Material Cut-off Treaty (FMCT), which seeks to curb the quantum of fissile material on the planet and holds far greater potential than CTBT. Since its own house is in disorder, the US Administration may just be vulnerable, perhaps desperate to achieve success.

To be frank, India's status in this great nuclear debate is largely peripheral. The US is more worried about maverick nations and individuals -- from North Korea to Osama bin Laden -- building nuclear arsenals. Seen in a broader perspective, the US and India can even work in conjunction but for that to happen each will have to establish its bona fides with the other. The overall goal must of course be disarmament. This has to be tempered with the realisation that a complete dismantling of nuclear weaponry could take decades. Perhaps India's proposal to this effect at the United Nations in 1988 is a starting point. To sweeten the FMCT-CTBT pill, the US would do well to announce a unilateral truncation of its enormous nuclear stockpile. The proof of the pudding lies in the eating. It is time for that adage to apply to those at the nuclear high table.

Top

Back | Next

 

ITGO

BUSINESS TODAY | INDIA TODAY PLUS | COMPUTERS TODAY
TEENS TODAY | MUSIC TODAY |
ART TODAY | NEWS TODAY | SYNDICATIONS TODAY

Write to us | Subscriptions | Advertise with us
© Living Media India Ltd