|
Take
on the Mob
Safffron hooliganism is undermining
Indian democracy
Those
protesting against the making of Water in Varanasi are guaranteed their
proverbial 15 minutes of fame -- or perhaps infamy. Unfortunately, they
are also on the way to making a laughing stock of India. Deepa Mehta may
be a good, bad or indifferent director but she has every right to exercise
her creativity. Having obtained the necessary clearances -- re-obtained
them, given her meeting with government officials in the past few days
-- no cultural police has the right to disrupt her work. The inability
to tolerate another view -- and the damaging of an M.F. Husain exhibition,
the violence against a City of Joy or the banning of a Mee Nathuram Godse
Boltoy are all manifestations of this -- is mobocracy, not democracy.
The
methods of the Sangh Parivar affiliates that are battling Water are, of
course, objectionable. Their logic too is questionable. They want the
film's script made public, seeking to judge intellectual property in the
way the Inquisition decided who was a heretic. Their singling out of Mehta
for an alleged defamation of India's most ancient extant city only reflects
the complete lack of a sense of history, of the very tradition that is
claimed to be defended. Two and a half millennia ago, Gautam Buddha made
more critical remarks about Varanasi -- about its takeover by a self-serving
priestly elite -- than Mehta would ever hope to. Presumably the Kashi
Sanskriti Raksha Sangharsh Samiti will next run a posthumous campaign
against that first great dissenter. From stopping cricket matches to film
screenings, saffron vandalism holds all India to ransom. It is a painfully
familiar routine -- first create a violent situation, then force the state
to cancel the event citing a law and order problem. The mob gets what
it wants -- forcing its opponents to compromise and earning itself enormous
publicity. The only loser is Indian democracy, having to give that much
more room to intolerance.
Stop the Gravy
Train
Do cricket sponsors want to keep pampering
mediocrity ?
About
a week has passed since the Indian cricket team returned home after the
clobbering in Australia. The players are still omnipresent on the television
screen -- smiling, giggling, gambolling, endorsing everything from toothpaste
to suit lengths. For a bunch of losers, India's top cricketers certainly
live a good life. They are unique in the sporting arena in that they are
paid equally irrespective of performance. This simply should not continue.
A system of performance-based wages offers scope for greater motivation.
It will be argued that the cricket board's pay cheque accounts for only
a small portion of a big star's wealth. Substantially greater sums come
from sponsors. They are the ones who have a double duty to perform.
Corporate houses fund cricket in two ways
-- officially through the board and privately by entering into deals with
individual cricketers. It is time minimum standards of accountability
were sought for these huge promotional budgets. Withdrawing from blindly
pumping the board with money, let sponsors ask it for specific plans for
developing the game -- and then finance these. When it comes to cricketers,
companies should consider cutting their endorsement fees when they play
poorly. This would make commercial sense too. Would consumers want to
watch an advertisement featuring a batsman who can barely survive at the
crease? Whether it is in negotiating with board officials or individual
cricketers, sponsors operate in a seller's market -- if one company drops
out, another steps in. Maybe the way out is for the giant sponsors to
form a cartel and -- as the ESPN-Star Sports partnership did with telecast
rights -- put the brakes on the gravy train. Otherwise, the game can chug
along to damnation.
|
|
|
|

|