|
Alice
in Plunderland Go
Rabri, go with your dignity still intact
Ever
the master of sophistry, Laloo Prasad Yadav used his final hours before
being sent to prison to accuse the CBI of "harassing a poor
woman". While the RJD president is free to see the chargesheet
against Rabri Devi, his wife and successor as Bihar's chief minister, as a
derivative of misogyny, for the rest of the world it is plain swindle. The
CBI special court in Patna has granted Rabri bail but the legal case
against her -- abetting her husband's misuse of public office and unlawful
accumulation of wealth -- is still valid. In a replay of the drama before
Laloo's resignation in 1997, the Yadav couple's kept intellectuals have
emphasised there is no constitutional need for Rabri to bow out.
Comparisons are also being drawn with BJP ministers arraigned in the Babri
Masjid demolition case. There are two important differences. First, Laloo
-- and by association Rabri -- is being tried for crimes committed while
he was chief minister. So neither he nor his wife has the moral authority
to hold the very office till exonerated. Two, the charges are specific and
not diffused within a larger ambit of collateral wrongdoing.
With
RJD MLAs virtually captive performers in the Yadav couple's
socially-correct circus, it is for the Congress -- the other big partner
in Patna's ruling alliance -- to persuade Rabri to quit. If the party
fails to discharge its duty, it may as well recall P.V. Narasimha Rao as
Congress president and forgive him his history of chargesheets. With the
RJD-led coalition's majority in the Assembly unquestioned, Laloo's party
has to find itself a new chief minister. It may so far have functioned as
the outhouse of a family estate but a dose of organisational pluralism
will do the RJD no harm. When he retained power after a decade of what can
only charitably be termed inchoate raj, Laloo's theoreticians stressed
democracy, warts and all, represented the only solution to Bihar's chaos.
It is time for the RJD to internalise that lesson.
Summer Holiday
NAM has bridged the gap between
diplomacy and necromancy
Two
categories of Indians would have been exultant at the idea of the 13th
ministerial conference of the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) in Cartagena,
Colombia. First, those who accompanied External Affairs Minister Jaswant
Singh for a holiday to the venue, a Caribbean beach resort best known for
the annual Miss Colombia beauty pageant. The second section -- retired
foreign secretaries, professors of international relations and sundry
pundits -- will flood newspapers in the coming days with ponderous
articles on the relevance or otherwise of NAM. How pointless this debate
is was made clear by Jaswant's junior minister, Ajit Panja, just days ago
when he disparaged NAM as a dinosaur. Of the three NAM summits in the
1990s, one took place in Cartagena itself. The other two were hosted by
Jakarta (Indonesia) and Durban (South Africa). Not one of these countries
is guilty of the doctrinaire policies that NAM's unrepentant Indian
champions commend.
Unipolarity -- and, more important, an
American economic prosperity of dazzling proportions -- has converted
non-alignment to something between a caricature and a jamboree.
Collectively its members make the suitable noises; privately each plays
favourite nephew to Uncle Sam. At the Durban meeting, India suffered the
ignominy of Nelson Mandela lecturing it on Kashmir. In another age,
India's support for the African National Congress' struggle against
apartheid would have made new South Africa its client state. Today,
Pretoria has jettisoned history and is happily pursuing its business
agenda. Modern-day diplomacy is far removed from the shibboleths and
ideological combat that were the staple of NAM's founders in 1961. If only
it were as easy to convince extant Laski-ites.
|
|
|
|

|