India Today Editorials
July 03, 2000

METRO TODAY   |   DAILY NEWS   |   ASTROLOGY   |   ARCHIVES    |   INDIA TODAY    |  HOME


Cover Story
 | Columns | Nation | Newsnotes | From the Editor in Chief | Editorials | Eyecatchers
   States | Voices | Books | Viewpoint | Health |Sports | Neighbours | Business | Religion      |Cinema | Offtrack | Issue Contents


Money for Nothing

Keep governors out of the game of competitive populism

India Today issue dated July 03, 2000In rejecting the proposal to allocate an annual development allowance to state governors, the Union Government has acted judiciously. The proposal, reportedly the brainchild of the governor of Uttar Pradesh, envisaged a corpus of Rs 10 crore being made available to the resident of every Raj Bhavan in the country. The governor would then be free to disburse the money as he deemed fit, for projects and to organisations of his choice. The model for this patently disingenuous idea was the MP Local Area Development Scheme (MPLADS), which since it began in 1993 has given parliamentarians a total of Rs 4,000 crore to spend on theirMoney for Nothing constituencies. That 35 per cent of this money has not been used and where the MPLADS has come into effect it has inevitably led to suspicions of cosy deals tells its own story. Such patronage devices are a throwback to feudalism; they are completely out of place in a democracy where the State should, in theory, be in the business of providing services rather than distributing largesse.

Institutionalised profligacy aside, the prospect of giving semi-executive authority to governors is less than welcome. The tenant of Raj Bhavan occupies an ornamental post -- and is sometimes described as "His Honourable Irrelevancy". Apart from discretionary powers in, primarily, the North-east, he has no normal role to perform other than attest whatever decisions the state ministry takes. As the Centre's agent he can destabilise an unfriendly local government but even that role is circumscribed thanks to the death of one-party dominance and Supreme Court stipulations on the use of Article 356. Even so, governors are rarely paragons of virtue. Most are temporarily exiled politicians itching to get back to the power game. To allow them access to public money would be to do just that. Subsidising intrigue is not the taxpayer's national duty.


Lip Service to Morality

That Gujarat is rethinking its prohibition laws is welcome news

Lip Service to MoralityIn the land of hypocrisy, the unenforceable law is king. For half a century, Gujarat has, in theory, been alcohol-free. Now the state Government is considering easing prohibition laws to make Gujarat a more attractive workplace for, particularly, it professionals. Should this scheme find favour in Gandhinagar, it will begin to undo one of the most self-defeating measures in Indian legislative history. The idea of enforced abstinence is enshrined in the Directive Principles of the Constitution. In adopting it, Gujarat was to serve as a model. Instead, the Mahatma's native land has lacerated his cherished if impracticable -- and, put bluntly, undemocratic -- aspiration. Today bootlegging is not merely a Gujarati cottage industry but the base of a gigantic, tightly organised crime syndicate. Its impact on and symbiotic relationship with politics is an open secret.

That prohibition creates more problems than it solves is hardly a recent discovery. Its imposition in the US in 1920 spawned the gangster culture -- and gave the underworld an illicit liquor tycoon called Al Capone. Four decades later, the nascent Mumbai mafia received a boost from the city's then operational dry laws. In the 1990s, Andhra Pradesh and Haryana tried to ban the bottle. All that resulted was a cocktail of smuggling, revenue losses and hooch tragedies. A good law is not merely one that is inspired by ideals, it is also easily put into effect. Prohibition fails this crucial test, just as Muhammad bin Tughlaq's introduction of token currency did seven centuries ago. Advocates of prohibition justify it on grounds of morality. Here too the illiberalism of deciding for an entire people what is good for them and what isn't is scarcely morally edifying. The nanny state cannot enlighten, it can only reprimand. That has been Gujarat's tragedy.

 

Indian music lovers, click here

 

Top

Back | Next

 

ITGO

BUSINESS TODAY | INDIA TODAY PLUS | COMPUTERS TODAY | CARE TODAY
TEENS TODAY | MUSIC TODAY |
ART TODAY | NEWS TODAY | SYNDICATIONS TODAY

Write to us | Subscriptions | Advertise with us
© Living Media India Ltd