| |
MATCH FIXING
Days of
ReckoningThe
BCCI will soon have to take tough decisions on the future
of the Indian coach and several players
By Sharda Ugra
There are, Napoleon said,
different ways of killing a man -- by pistol, sword,
poison or by moral assassination. "They are the same
in their results except that the last is more cruel."
There may be no end in sight to cricket's current
travails, but the men at the centre of the storm -- coach
Kapil Dev and former captains Mohammed Azharuddin and
Ajay Jadeja -- can consider themselves morally
assassinated. The CBI has called them in for questioning
and tax men have walked into their bedrooms, trampled
over their lawns and rifled through their private papers.
Yet, the first impact of these past four months will only
be felt when the Indian selectors sit down early in
August to pick the team for the Sahara Cup in Toronto.
Kapil Dev's term as
coach still has another year to run, Azharuddin has
played 99 Tests and dreams of a 100th, and Jadeja has
just shouldered his way back into the team. But can they
hold on to their jobs? Should they, at a time when
holding onto integrity is proving to be an ordeal?
Chairman of selectors
Chandu Borde backpedals fiercely, stating that "the
directive must come from the board president"
because "this is another matter". A directive
to omit players on grounds other than cricket is very
much a part of the BCCI's history and its rule book, but
it is board President A.C. Muthiah who will now call the
shots. The Chennai-based businessman remained unavailable
for comment.
Money for everything
and perks for free
RICH
PICKINGS
India's
elite cricketers can rake in the cash in many
ways that have nothing to do with bets or bookies |
| Lost in the swarm of stories about
property worth crores of rupees, luxury cars and
jewellery, is the savage twist to the tale of the
Income-Tax Department's raids on cricket's rich
and famous. India's biggest sporting heroes can,
without help from any manner of wheeler-dealers,
earn millions from cricket alone. An Indian
cricketer today, provided he stays in the playing
XI, takes home an enviable salary, and the bits
on the side are not bad either. The industry is
notoriously cagey but the following figures, an
estimate of the many sources of a cricketer's
income, have been obtained from the BCCI, sports
agents and advertisers: Match earnings:
As of 1998-99, Rs 1.1 lakh per Test match (the
board's match fee is Rs 40,000, and the balance
comes from the team sponsor, Wills Sport) and Rs
1.05 lakh per one-day international (Rs 25,000
from the board and the balance in sponsors' fees).
The team sponsors logo fees works out to Rs 70,000
per Test and Rs 80,000 per one-day match to the
playing XI.
The board deducts Rs 4,000 per Test match and Rs
2,000 per one-day international from every
cricketer's match fees and adds identical amounts
to the player's benevolent fund. The team is paid
a bonus for winning matches and the man of the
match prize money is shared in a 25-75 split
between the winner and the team pool.
In 1999, India played 10 Test matches and 43 one-day
internationals and this year, have already played
3 Tests and 20 one-day internationals. In a
packed 1998-99 season, Ajay Jadeja could have
earned more than Rs 40 lakh while Sachin
Tendulkar's match fees of the past five seasons (from
38 Tests and 147 ODIs) total close to Rs 2 crore.
Endorsements:
Cricketers endorse products from sliced bread to
designer watches. In 1995, Sachin Tendulkar's
record five-year signing fee with World Tel was,
by conservative estimates, worth $5 million or Rs
22.5 crore. In 1998, Rahul Dravid was worth Rs 20
lakh to Pepsi for a year-long contract. Today
Ajay Jadeja can routinely charge Rs 40 lakh for
an endorsement deal, and a one-year contract for
youngsters like Debashis Mohanty or V.V.S. Laxman
could cost between Rs 6 lakh and Rs 10 lakh. The
agent's commission ranges between 10 and 25 per
cent. Built into most contracts are healthy
bonuses for centuries hit, wickets taken and
other "honours" like the captaincy,
which help build the profile of players.
Sponsored columns: Indian cricket's "expert"
columns are usually ghost-written, rehashed and
hugely expensive, especially if a current player
is involved. Syndication agencies pay a columnist
depending on his star value, starting from Rs 50,000
for a current star like Saurav Ganguly. Former
Indian cricketers like Dilip Vengsarkar, Mohinder
Amarnath or Sanjay Manjrekar could charge
something like Rs 15,000 per column.
County/league
club contracts: Dravid, Ganguly and Anil
Kumble will be paid a tax-deducted salary of --
60,000-70,000 (Rs 42-49 lakh) for playing county
cricket. Indian cricketers also head off to play
club and league cricket in the off season, the
better English league clubs offering players up
to -- 5,000-8,000 (Rs 3.5-5.6 lakh) a season for
weekend games and free accommodation.
Corporate functions/interviews: Celebrity
appearances at a corporate function or personal
TV interview have their own price. An hour with a
star player could cost Rs 3-4 lakh. One with
coach Kapil Dev could cost $1,000 (Rs 45,000).
The latest chestnut in the fire is on-line chats
on websites, with star players charging close to
Rs 50,000 for an hour-long chat.
Benefit matches: Amarnath and Vengsarkar received
Rs 40 lakh each from benefit games. The
Cricketers' Benefit Fund in Sharjah has named 40
Indians as beneficiaries, awarding them Rs 11
lakh each.
|
KAPIL DEV
Total match earnings*: Rs 66.5
lakh
Played:
131 Tests/ 225 ODIs (1978-1994)
*This estimate is calculated by taking an average
of Rs 25,000 per Test and Rs 15,000 per one-dayer
before the mid-90s windfall. Excludes all rewards
after the 1983 World Cup and world record wickets.MOHAMMED
AZHARUDDIN
Total match earnings*: Rs 2.1 cr
Played:
99 Tests/ 334 ODIs (1984-2000)
*In Azhar's career spanning almost two decades,
total match fees have increased from an average
of Rs 25,000 to Rs 1.1 lakh per Test and an
average of Rs 10,000 to Rs 1.05 lakh per one-dayer.
AJAY
JADEJA
Total match earnings*: Rs 1.7 cr
Played: 15 Tests/ 196 ODIs (1992-2000)
*A product of pyjama cricket, endorsement
contracts for players like Jadeja are estimated
to be nearly three times their earnings from
cricket matches and so fees tell only partial
truths.
|
Silence cannot will away
cricket's problems. It is merely a sign that the pressure
from the Government is now beginning to tell. A BCCI
official admitted that "everyone would heave a sigh
of relief" if Kapil Dev stepped down before Toronto.
The coach's two-year contract with the board can come up
for review at the annual general meeting scheduled for
September. It could also be revoked but that is not a
step anyone would want to contemplate, even though after
the raids public sentiment has shifted away from the man
who brought home a World Cup. Two factors have kept his
position secure so far: the memories his name evokes, and
the CBI's flimsy legal case. The memories and sympathy
are fading fast, and while the Gujarat Government's much-publicised
decision to scrap a school text chapter on Kapil may well
be populist tokenism, the gesture carried the sting of a
slap on the face.
In these circumstances,
how much of a coach could Kapil be? His record with the
Indian team is already dire: under Kapil's tutelage,
India have played eight Tests and 25 one-day
internationals, winning a solitary Test and nine one-dayers.
Last season, India failed to bowl out a weak New Zealand
twice in two home Tests and early this year lost a Test
series at home for the first time in 13 years.
Predictably, now there are rumblings within the team
itself, senior players complaining in private that Kapil's
cricket inputs have failed to fit the bill, that he
fusses too much about the team's clothes rather than its
competitiveness.
"Kapil should be
left alone," advises former captain Mansur Ali Khan
Pataudi, "until something can be proved against him.
At the moment he's being judged in public, which is
unfair. He should continue as coach, provided he thinks
he can do a proper job, which I personally feel will be
difficult."
What of the cricketers,
who are hardly likely to step down even though they will
play before an increasingly cynical audience? At the
moment only Jadeja, Azharuddin and Nikhil Chopra, at most
times on the fringe, are in the running for selection.
On cricketing merit
alone the veterans' cases are shaky: in 11 one-day
matches this year, Azharuddin has scored one fifty in a
total of 268 runs, while Jadeja has 315 runs and two half-centuries.
It makes for a very neat numerical smokescreen; should
the selectors be instructed by the board to make someone
pay for Bookiegate, their careers could crash and burn
inside a month. Pataudi poses an intriguing question:
"Some board officials have also been raided. What's
to be done with them?" Whatever direction the CBI
and the income-tax investigations may take, it is now
certain that Indian cricket and its stars will take many
months to recover from a crisis of their own making.
|
|
|
|

|