|
BUSINESS:
DABHOL POWER PROJECT
It's
On, It's On It's Enron
Does
Maharashtra have excess power?
There are
conflicting reports on this. The state has an installed capacity of 11,300
MW-including Enron's 695 MW in the first phase-but peak hour shortfall
can be as much as 1,500 MW. Intriguingly, it's also claimed the MSEB is
buying from Enron by keeping a capacity of 1,450 MW capacity idle. These
include the 500 MW gas thermal station at Uran, the 650 MW coal thermal
stations at Koradi and Khaperkheda and the 300 MW of the cheaper capacity
of the Tata-bses system. Power from Uran costs only 80 paise a unit while
it costs Rs 2 from the coal-fired stations. "There's no need for
even phase I of Enron, leave alone phase II,'' says activist Pradyumna
Kaul of the Enron Virodhi Andolan. Projections by Pune-based NGO Prayas
show that there will be a power surplus of 9.5 per cent by the year 2004-05
in Maharashtra. What's not clear though is on what assumptions of demand
increase are these projections based on.
|
POWER
PLAY
|
- Enron's
is a counter guaranteed project, so if MSEB defaults, the state
pays. If the state too defaults the Centre has to foot the bill.
-
There are conflicting estimates whether Maharashtra is power surplus
or not. That makes the debate on feasibility of phase-II baseless.
-
MSEB's bigger woes are subsidised power and 31% transmission and
distribution losses.
|
Why can't
excess power be sold to other states?
Private power
producers are not allowed to sell to anybody other than state electricity
boards. In Enron's case, only the MSEB, its sole customer, can sell this
power. But MSEB officials are pessimistic about the outcome. "We
won't have any buyers at Rs 4 a unit when there are cheaper power sources
available."
But if Enron's
power is sold through the Power Trading Corporation (PTC), MSEB will not
have to incur the fixed power charge. It will be distributed equally in
the western grid consisting of Maharashtra, Gujarat and Goa. Selling Enron's
power through the PTC will bring down costs and ensure 100 per cent capacity
utilisation.
Does
India really need Enron phase II?
With as
much 80 per cent of construction of phase II complete and trial runs due
this week, this question is now academic.
This liquefied
natural gas-fired project (2,184 MW) will be the world's largest private
power project ($3 billion or around Rs 14,000 crore). Foreign equity investment
of $685.7 million has flowed in for phase II and it achieved financial
closure in May 1999. Indian financial institutions have also invested
heavily in the project.
What
is the way out?
The Democratic
Front Government is split down the middle over scrapping phase II but
it looks like the project will eventually be renegotiated. Chief Minister
Vilasrao Deshmukh has set up a committee to examine the entire project.
Among its briefs will be to examine renegotiation, find out whether DPC
can sell its power to either NTPC or to neighbouring states, to lower
electricity rates and finally to look into the legal and financial implications
if phase III is scrapped.
Kirit Parikh
of the Indira Gandhi Centre of Development Research advises the state
Government to push Enron for more concessions. First a reduction in capacity
charges. Enron obtained financial closure for phase II at a much lower
interest rate as compared to phase I. Savings should be passed on to MSEB
and capacity charges reduced. "Options for restructuring the DPC's
debt should be explored," he says.
DPC officials
are wary of touching the PPA a second time but have spoken of ways to
reduce the financial burden. "We're looking at a mix of solutions,''
says McGregor. These could range from the sale of power to other states
and blocks to Central bodies like the NTPC. But even if DPC went down
the road giving concessions, they would be worth nothing if the MSEB is
unable to pay up.
Another
solution to the power tangle would be to allow the private producers to
sell directly to consumers. That would keep the cash-strapped SEBs out
of harm's way.
For MSEB
the tonic lies in tremendous political will on the part of the state Government.
The board has repeatedly asked for it to be allowed to collect its dues
or disconnect defaulters, charge a more realistic tariff and even reduce
subsidies from an astronomical 90 per cent to at least a manageable 40
per cent. Just recovering its dues from, say, rich sugarcane farmers will
add Rs 5,000 crore to the MSEB's kitty. But in the power play of politics
cutting subsidies is one trip no politician worth his khadi cap is willing
to take.
Pg.
1
Top |