|
VIEWPOINT: POLITICALLY CORRECT
Carry On Reforms
Sinha
has the prime minister's backing. He must present a growth-stimulating
budget.
By
P. Chidambaram
It is Budget time. Thanks to the media the
making of the budget has turned into an annual spectacle. Virtually everybody
who is anybody feels he has a relevant input. I welcome this trend. There
is no longer the fear of another paradigm shift or of reversing gears.
Nor is there apprehension of swadeshi regression or creeping socialism.
Budget-making has settled into an established mode of incremental reform.
In a few years, I hope, budget-making will be stripped of the remaining
veils of secrecy and become a participative exercise.
The most important person in budget-making is
the prime minister. In a coalition government especially, it is the prime
minister who can ensure the finance minister's "autonomy" and
provide vital support for a good budget.
Vajpayee has lately spoken of hard measures.
He has repeatedly declared that his government's goal is 9 per cent GDP
growth. He has supported disinvestment in public-sector enterprises, welcomed
foreign direct investment in new areas and authorised downsizing in banks
and other institutions through reducing the age of superannuation and
voluntary retirement schemes. He has cautioned Indian industry against
the clamour for undue protection, he has assured farmers a fair deal,
and has promised the small scale sector a helping hand in the wake of
the removal of quantitative restrictions. If his words are to be believed,
the prime minister is determined to remain firmly on the reform path.
However, it should be noted that Vajpayee heads
a coalition government. Moreover, the National Democratic Alliance faces
elections in four states and one Union territory, and this will be its
first test since it assumed office in October 1999. Lastly, there are
signs that the alliance may unravel at the slightest provocation: witness
the sudden exit of the Pattali Makkal Katchi.
| |
 |
|
|
Jayanto
|
Vajpayee has also introduced a novel political
element into the budget exercise. In January 2001, he set up an informal
group of ministers to interact with the finance minister. This is unprecedented.
Its composition is eclectic: it includes free-enterpriser Murasoli Maran
as well as the socialist-turned-pragmatist George Fernandes. Whether the
group will reinforce the resolve to usher in broader reforms or act as
a restraint is anybody's guess.
The Gujarat earthquake is also a factor that
may be allowed to impact the budget. In my view, it should not. There
is ample international aid. Besides, Gujarat's needs can be isolated and
the necessary funds raised through one-time measures. It will be adding
insult to injury if the suffering of the people of Gujarat is cited as
reason for tampering with the budget's structure and integrity.
From his actions and words, I read the prime
minister's directive to the finance minister as follows: Be firm in your
commitment to reforms, but take calibrated measures. The question is what
will this message translate into when Yashwant Sinha rises to present
his fourth budget?
If you had read my last piece ("Fiscal
Follies", February 5), you will remember that I had expressed my
concerns in four areas: inflation, agriculture, investment and the fiscal
deficit. What is encouraging though is the remarkable convergence of opinion,
among economists and administrators, about what needs to be done. Everybody's
wishlist seems to contain the following:
- Reduce subsidies (at least on fertilisers
and transport)
- Reduce interest rates
- Remove surcharges on income tax, corporate
tax and customs duties
- Restore the distributed dividend tax to 10
per cent
- Eliminate reservations for the small-scale
sector
- Accelerate power-sector reforms
- Liberalise the rules for foreign direct investment
(better still, abolish the sectoral caps and differences)
- Quicken disinvestment (better still, privatise)
- Enhance outlays for agriculture, particularly
for the Accelerated Irrigation Benefit Programme and for watershed management,
water- harvesting and ground-water development
- Downsize government
I think that Yashwant Sinha would like to do
all this and more. He should be concerned about the huge waste in the
delivery of goods and services, making a mockery of the enormous amounts
provided year after year for poverty alleviation and development. He should
carry out his intention to attach World Bank-type conditionalities to
the devolution of funds to the states. He should insist that every state
replicate the "best practices" that have been proven elsewhere,
like the Education Guarantee Programme (Madhya Pradesh); the Water Users
Associations (Andhra Pradesh); the Employment Guarantee Programme (Maharashtra);
and management of the Public Distribution System (Kerala).
Yashwant Sinha should assert his "autonomy"
and present a focused budget that will stimulate growth. He holds the
loneliest position in the Government. If he misses the opportunity-as
he did in 2000-there will be few who will rise to his defence. He has
our best wishes.
(The
author is a former Indian finance minister and a TMC leader.)
|