 |
|
|
Escape
to Victory
Down and virtually out, India create a miracle at the Eden Gardens to
stun the Australians and break their winning streak.
|
|
|
THE
ARTS
|
|
|
Mixing
Metaphors Music, dance,
and tourism synthesise in the famed textile centre of Maheshwar to provide
sustainable synergies for its growth.
|
|
|
OTHER STORIES
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Home |
|
 |
| |
COVER STORY: DEFENCE ESTABLISHMENT
BARAK MISSILES
Off The Mark?
As a missile, the
Barak, which means lightning in Hebrew, is not just fast but accurate.
However, the middlemen who mentioned the deal as dubious in the Tehelka
revelations may have been misguided. Contrary to what they alleged, the
missile made by Israel was not rammed down the navy's throat. In 1996,
Naval Headquarters asked for it after Pakistan acquired from the US the
deadly Harpoon missiles that posed a threat to India's sole aircraft carrier,
the INS Viraat.
A.P.
J. Abdul Kalam, the then scientific adviser to the defence minister, did
object to the Barak deal on the grounds that the Defence Research &
Development Organisation (DRDO) was building the Trishul missile as a
counter to the Harpoon. But with the indigenous missile beset with problems
that had seriously delayed its development, Kalam agreed to the Barak's
import. Admiral Vishnu Bhagwat, the then chief of naval staff, had wanted
to import only one such system-for the Viraat-as he felt it was too expensive.
But after he was dismissed from service in December 1999, the Cabinet
in March 2000 cleared the acquisition of seven systems to be fitted on
other Indian warships. A senior naval officer says, "Buying just
one weapon system of a kind only increases lifecycle costs, complicates
training and holding of spares." A DRDO official says the Rs 580-crore
contract for the Barak systems is twice as expensive as the Trishul programme.
But the navy argues that with the Trishul still undergoing trials it had
no other option.
-Sandeep Unnithan
|
|
|
|
|
 |
METRO TODAY |
| |
Web
Exclusives |
|
| |
A bloody crackdown on Naxalites in the south-eastern
fringes of Uttar Pradesh proves that only developmental programmes, not
guns, can help fight the menace. INDIA TODAY's Special Correspondent Subhash
Mishra explains why in
Despatches.
|
|
|