| |
ECONOMY: STOCKMARKETS
K Goes To Kolkata
The slide in stock prices and the ensuing mayhem
on the bourses have once again raised doubts about SEBI's will or capacity
to regulate the markets.
By V. Shankar Aiyar and Sumit Mitra
A landslide in
the stock index is so commonplace these days that it is often tucked away
in one corner of the front pages of financial newspapers. In the past
14 months, the 30-share Sensex has slid 13 times by over 200 points (including
a 361 point fall on April 4, 2000), 16 times by more than 175 points and
19 times by more than 150 points. Each on a single day. But the March
2 drop of 176 points was different.
 |
|
CHOKED: The bears trapped Parekh
in a payment crisis
|
|
The uniqueness of the market's vacuum suction
doesn't lie in its duration alone, though it is still holding the index
leagues below its pre-budget level of 4,000-plus. The new slump has, of
course, made many stocks discover how low their values may get. In one
week, March 6 to March 13, HFCL, the favourite fodder of king bull Ketan
Parekh, lost 54.58 per cent of its price from Rs 508 to Rs 231. Silverline,
yet another K-marked stock, fell with a thud from Rs 122 to Rs 75. However,
if there is a moral to the story, it does not lie in the gradient of fall
in stock prices. That's just the symptom. The disease, spreading itself
in the trading system, can be simply put as a conflict of interest between
the stockbroker and the investor. The broker is meant to be an intermediary
between the buyer and the seller. If he appropriates the role of one,
it becomes a punishment for the other. The current crisis in the market
is a cynical revelation of brokers first being buyers, often at the instance
of big operators, and then doubling as sellers, again on cue from large
players.
| ALL
FALL DOWN |
Feb. 28
|
Mar. 13
|
| Himachal
Futuristic Communications |
670.40
|
230.75
|
| HCL
Technologies |
622.65
|
396.35
|
| DSQ Software |
373.95
|
149.90
|
| Global Telesystems |
404.25
|
159.30
|
| Zee Telefilms |
169.70
|
110.60
|
| Silverline
Technologies |
183.50
|
75.00
|
| Wipro |
2,544.80
|
1,396.40
|
| Reliance Petro |
61.85
|
47.00
|
| Satyam Computers |
347.00
|
203.55
|
| Global Trust
Bank |
74.90
|
38.7
|
|
Stock prices in Rs
|
Nothing proves this better than a small but significant
incident on March 2. Anand Rathi, president of the BSE, called up the
exchange's Surveillance Department in the presence of board members and
a vice-president to check on the individual positions taken by members
on a few selected scrips. Such information is privileged as it can influence
the prices. Calls to the department are recorded. However, neither the
other directors nor the executive director or the Surveillance Department
chief reported the incursion to SEBI. Nor did SEBI call for the tapes
despite news reports appearing about the call.
It was only after an insider tipped SEBI Chairman
D.R. Mehta that the watchdog found its bark. The recording was seized
and Rathi asked to quit amidst pressure from the media and the Finance
Ministry. Later on, the broker members on the BSE Board were suspended.
But it was yet another knee-jerk reaction which did not address the main
problem of brokers doubling as buyers or sellers.
By then, however, Parekh and his bull associates
were trapped by a cartel of bears who had choked the trading terminals
with ever-growing "sell" orders, particularly of HFCL shares
that were assiduously nursed by Parekh. With the free-falling price, the
bulls could either pay to the stock exchange the price difference between
one settlement day and another, or take delivery and book the loss.
 |
|
CARELESS WHISPERS: Rathi misused his office to access privileged
information
|
|
The bulls, therefore, made a strategic retreat
to the Calcutta Stock Exchange (CSE), where an unofficial, margin-less
and high-interest financing system overshadows the official lending system
by a ratio of 10:1 in value terms in a normal settlement week. Parekh's
"friends" at the CSE, particularly Dinesh K. Singhania, a former
director of the exchange, took long positions on HFCL with capital borrowed
from unofficial sources reportedly at 30 per cent per annum (against the
official rate of 11 per cent). However, the high rate of interest was
not the only problem faced by Parekh's Kolkata friends. The market was
gripped by the fear that Singhania and others would not be able to compensate
for the fall in prices of HFCL and DSQ Software-the two Kolkata flavours-on
March 15, Thursday, the pay-in day for the exchange. As CSE Executive
Director Tapas Dutta explained on Wednesday, the members had gone long
on 20 lakh HFCL and 14 lakh DSQ shares. The unofficial lenders, it was
feared, would not open their purse-strings any longer, and the consequent
payment shortfall in the exchange would cross Rs 500 crore, way beyond
the capacity of the exchange in meeting the pay-out requirements of Friday.
That would have created a payment crisis, involving not only brokers and
lenders but also thousands of retail investors. All of them were milling
round Lyons Range in Kolkata since Monday, their faces taut with anxiety,
striking a contrasting note to the joyous excitement at the nearby Eden
Gardens, where India beat Australia in the second cricket Test.
|
|