| |
ENVIRONMENT: CNG
Hashmi's Intentions 'Mala Fide'
Equally suspicious
is how Nugas managed to convince the Delhi Government to order CNG kits
at that price. When the government floated a tender in July 1999, it received
offers as low as Rs 1,65,000-2,48,000 per kit. Among those who participated
was RFAT. But the tender was called off by Hashmi on the grounds that
none of the participants had met all the tender requirements. "We
were awarded the first tender in March on the strength of our technology.
So how could we be written off in July? Obviously, Hashmi's intentions
were malafide," rails Singh. It is also from the prices quoted for
first generation kits in this tender that Khurana estimates the dimensions
of the scam. As a former transport minister in Delhi he alleges that the
Nugas kits, at close to Rs 5 lakh for private operators, are double the
rate of what they should have been. This raises the stakes of the scam
to around Rs 200 crore-an amount Khurana claims will get siphoned away
into private kitties.
Nugas suddenly appears to have hit a rough patch
and now even its technology is being questioned. On April 10, hundreds
of private operators were shocked when the Ministry of Surface Transport
informed them that the certificate issued to Nugas' CNG kit by the IIP
"is based on the emission norms of 1992 and, therefore, usable in
buses manufactured up to March 1996" but "the certificate is
invalid for vehicles manufactured after March 1996".
|
Poisoned Project
|
|
March 5, 1999:
DTC floats tender. RFAT bags pilot project to convert two diesel
buses with third generation kits.
July 23, 1999: DTC floats another
tender. Gets quotation for first generation kits ranging from Rs
1.65 lakh to Rs 2.48 lakh. Tender not awarded.
July 17, 1999: RFAT test successful.
Feb 25, 2000: DTC ties up with
new entrant Nugas, which has no experience in field. Nugas also
gets clearance from Indian Institute of Petroleum.
Nov 10, 2000: CVC forwards complaint
against Nugas to CBI which registers a preliminary enquiry.
April 10, 2001: IIP issues letter
to Ministry of Surface Transport saying certificate issued to Nugas
is not valid for post 1996 buses.
April 10, 2001: Ministry of Surface
Transport issues letters to Delhi operators saying Nugas kits cannot
be used for converting vehicles manufactured after 1996.
April 10, 2001: A Delhi transporter
files an fir in a Delhi police station against Nugas, charging it
with cheating. In his complaint, Himmat Singh says Nugas knew it
was not allowed to convert his bus manufactured in the year 2000,
yet took
Rs 10,000 for the CNG kit.
|
So if Nugas knew it could not convert buses manufactured
after 1996, why did it take registration amounts for the kits from private
operators? In the fir lodged by Himmat Singh, general secretary of the
DTC Private Operators Welfare Association, it is mentioned that "this
fact was never brought to my notice by Ramesh Handa and his agents ...
Handa, knowing fully well that he was not in a position to convert my
bus (year 2000 model), deliberately induced me to part with the Rs 10,000
booking amount".
What made matters worse for Nugas was a letter
issued by the IIP to the Ministry of Surface Transport. Also dated April
10, it confirmed that the certificate issued by it was invalid for "all
the vehicles manufactured after March 1996" as far as conversion
was concerned. RFAT now says that it was offering third generation technology
and yet the Delhi government opted for Nugas with its first generation
technology for converting diesel buses into CNG ones.
All this has come as a huge blow to Nugas which
is now threatening to sue the IIP. Nugas' spokesperson Yash Pal Arora
says that there was a collective effort by some people in defaming the
reputation of the firm as well as spreading rumours about the validity
of its certificate. Nugas also claims to be in the possession of a certificate
it received from an Ahmadnagar-based organisation on January 1, 2001,
that permits it to sell its CNG kits to all transporters without validity
problems.
These conflicting claims indicate that the CBI
may be forced to initiate a probe. Until the many discomforting questions
that have arisen are answered, the CNG controversy promises to spiral
into a political and business storm.
|
|