|
COVER STORY: GOVERNMENT
ZIG-ZAG
The way to WiLL-based mobility has been replete
with subterfuge at the top and lack of transparency in decision-making.
TRAI's No
June 9, 1999. TRAI clarifies to the Department
of Telecom that the New Telecom Policy does not permit limited mobility
through the use of WiLL. On January 19, 2000 TRAI was disbanded and then
reconstituted as a new body, devoid of legal powers.
|

|
|
|
Paswan: WiLL must prevail
|
|
DoT Proposes
October 9, 2000. The DoT hands out predetermined
terms of reference to
TRAI on limited-mobility phone service.
TRAI is asked to suggest the distance
of limited mobility, entry fee and
spectrum charges.
Singh Steps In
October 11, 2000. A meeting at the PMO, chaired
by N.K. Singh, recommends limited mobility by fixed operators and advocates
getting it approved by the TRAI.
Mishra calls
November 6, 2000. Strategic Management Group
chaired by Brajesh Mishra endorses October 11 decision. Says TRAI must
give verdict by December 2000.
TRAI Complies
January 8, 2001. The regulator changes its 1999
interpretation of NTP 1999 and allows for limited services up to 50 km
with no restriction on number of service providers.
MPs Alert
March 8, 2001. The Parliament's Standing Committee
on Information Technology expresses apprehension on fixed-phone companies
providing mobility without a mobile licence; advises level playing field
for the two services.
Call Error
March 19, 2001. Mishra and Singh address a press
conference and deny that the PMO had any role in framing the guidelines
on limited mobility.
GoT-IT gets it
The Wise Men: April 6, 2001. As lobbying and
criticism mounts, limited mobility is referred to the 10-member group
on telecom. The GoT is to adjudicate the dispute.
|