India Today Group Online
 


May 7, 2001
Issue


 

COVER
   

Children For Sale
For as little as Rs 3,000, impoverished parents sell their children to adoption centres and unscrupulous operators in Andhra Pradesh, who in turn earn up to Rs 3 lakh from foster families. A look at the people involved, the law and where the process went wrong.

 

 
STATES
   

Amma Turns Red
J. Jayalalitha's hopes for contesting the elections have been dashed with the rejection of her nomination papers. But this does not deter her from stepping up her campaigning efforts for the AIADMK and assuming an aggressive stance.

 

 
NEIGHBOURS
   

Past Tense
The muted reaction of the Government to the massacre of the BSF troops raises many questions. A look at the past skirmishes between the BSF and BDR gives an insight into what led to the heightening of tension at the border.

 

 
BUSINESS
 

Coming To Life
With the end of state monopoly, private insurance companies are offering wider risk coverage and better customer relations.

 

 
PHOTO FEATURE
 

Starting Over
It's been three months since nature shook Gujarat, killing over 30,000 and shattering dreams. Despite government promises and generosity of individuals, rehabilitation is still to touch the lives of many. The story in pictures.

 

 
OTHER STORIES
     
 



 
  Home  
 

NEIGHBOURS: BANGLADESH

BSF Sounds Red Alert

On hearing of the Pyrdiwah capture, BSF Director-General Gurbachan Jagat issued an alert and ordered intensive patrolling. "If they could suddenly get belligerent in Pyrdiwah, there was no way of ruling out similar incidents elsewhere," he said. Patrols were asked to go out along the zero line that divides the two countries, for unlike in Kashmir where each battalion is responsible for a 30 km stretch, in the North-east, each battalion has to cover 90 km and thus there is a gap of 7-9 km between posts.

 

SAFE AND SOUND: A BSF jawan after he was handed over to Indian authorities by the BDR

 

Patrols were out after the red alert but at Mankachar in Assam, over 200 km away from Pyrdiwah, the BSF had other ideas. A party of 50-60 men drawn from 118 Battalion and led by Deputy Commandant B.R. Mondol was making an attempt to capture a post well into Bangladesh territory. It is still not clear whether Mondol was acting on his own or whether there were secret orders from BSF headquarters clearing the capture of a post to be used as a bargaining chip to regain Pyrdiwah. Officially, Jagat denies that such an order was passed and maintains it was a decision made by the local commander. "I asked for intensive patrolling," he says, adding, "Crossing the fence was not part of the brief." The operation, however, was ill conceived in more ways than one.

To begin with, the choice of the post was horribly wrong. Unlike Pyrdiwah, which is an adverse possession-a village inhabited by Indians but one that actually belongs to Bangladesh (till the border agreement is ratified and the populations exchanged)-Boraibari bordering Assam lies across a fence. Also, unlike Pyrdiwah, which is neither fenced nor has any pillars to clearly demarcate it, Boraibari is a large village with a population of at least 1,000. Its population has also largely been hostile to India because, as one senior official admitted, "We have often fired at them for entering our territory to cut trees." The issue of the BSF firing on civilians has often figured in the bi-annual meetings between the BSF and BDR chiefs. Former BSF chief E.N. Ram Mohan was even described as a "trigger happy chief" by Indian diplomats stationed in Dhaka, for the high commissioner there often got called to the Bangladesh foreign office over BSF firing on civilians.

Splitting the BSF party into three groups, Mondol led one comprising 16 men. Their aim-to cross the Boraibari village and occupy the BDR post. This was error number one, for unlike the Pyrdiwah post which is located on an adverse possession, the BDR post is on Bangladeshi land. The BSF would thus be violating Bangladesh's sovereignty if they took it and the BDR had the right to retaliate with force if necessary. Besides, Mondol had neither the numerical strength nor the fire power or the communication back-up that is crucial to counter-attacks. Mondol and party walked through a gate along the fence and took a nullah to reach Boraibari. They were totally unprepared for what followed.

Discovered by civilians, Mondol and his men heard a loud voice over the megaphone at the local mosque appealing to all villagers to gather because they were under attack from the BSF. According to the official version, before they knew it, the BSF party had been surrounded and dispossessed of weapons and wireless sets. Dragged by civilians and handed over to the BDR, Mondol's was among the 15 bodies that came back in wooden boxes, mutilated and shot at point-blank range. There is even evidence that Mondol may have been shot dead a day after he was captured.

So why did the BSF party not fire in self defence? "Probably because they are trained not to fire at civilians," says Jagat. But the rule changes if there is a life-endangering situation like the one in which the BSF men found themselves. Why did the party not try and send out a wireless message to warn their seniors? "Mondol probably felt that being a Bengali, he could handle it himself," says a BSF officer. There is a third explanation-they were caught in foreign territory and had no business to be there. A more uncharitable theory is that the BSF men were busy pillaging the village when the BDR struck.

TAKING PRECAUTIONS: Patrolling has been intensified on both sides of the Indo-Bangladesh border after the incidents

India began moving only after the BDR announced the killing of the 16 BSF personnel in the Boraibari encounter on April 18. Foreign Secretary Chokila Iyer summoned the Bangladesh High Commissioner Mustafa Farooq Mohammed to South Block. Iyer, handling the first major diplomatic crisis since her appointment earlier this year, said the "unprovoked and unwarranted" intrusion by the BDR was unacceptable. She apparently told the high commissioner in no uncertain terms that in case status quo ante was not restored in Pyrdiwah and cross-border firing not stopped, Delhi would not be responsible if the situation got out of hand. Around midnight, Iyer received a call from Bangladesh Foreign Secretary Syed Muazzam Ali, saying that orders had been issued to restore status quo ante as well as for immediate withdrawal from Pyrdiwah. The BDR withdrew from Pyrdiwah by the night of April 19.

Although the BDR handed over the 16 bodies to the BSF on April 20, Prime Minister Vajpayee could convey "India's deep sense of hurt and anguish" over the mutilation of bodies to Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina Wajed only two days later. The conversation took place hours after Foreign Minister Jaswant Singh expressed similar sentiments to his Bangladeshi counterpart Abdus Samad Azad.

If India's initial response to the BDR's misadventure was muted it was because the flare up came at a time when India was looking towards fulfilment of its pending agenda to promote security and economic interests in Bangladesh and beyond. With a friendly Sheikh Hasina-led Awami League Government in Dhaka, Indians were visualising some bilateral benefits that would make its north-eastern region more secure. Delhi is keen to get transit rights through Bangladesh in order to reduce the vulnerability of the Siliguri corridor. It wants access to natural gas in Bangladesh (some 428 billion cu m of it) in order to feed its energy hungry markets but cannot do so given the political situation in Dhaka. In fact, Bangladesh is central to India's theme to draw closer physical linkages with south-east Asia.

However, the "unwarranted" intrusion by the BDR has severely jolted the Indian plans and could derail Delhi's strategic interests. The anti-India sentiment currently raging in Bangladesh may give a leading edge in the forthcoming elections to Khaleda Zia's Bangladesh National Party, which has strong fundamentalist overtones (see box). The Indian reaction to Pyrdiwah appears to have gauged the extent of its negative impact on Delhi's relationship with Dhaka. The Government knew that if not handled properly, the border crisis had the potential to reopen the eastern front, thus nullifying the prime objective of the 1971 conflict. Also, as G. Parthasarthy, former Indian high commissioner to Pakistan, says, "It could be Pakistan's plan to open another front on India's eastern sector in order to divert Indian troops from Kashmir where the passes will be opening shortly." While hasty action could have regrettable fallouts, Delhi's reaction to the Boraibari massacre has come in for criticism. In the coming months it will have to justify its restraint as more uncomfortable truths pour out.




 
 
 
Care Today
     METRO TODAY
 
   

MetroScape

Focusing On Art
The brief for participants at
"Exhibit 'A' 2001" organised by the
200-member
Photographers'
Guild of India at the Nehru Centre, Mumbai, was clear—no advertisement and portfolio photos.
more...

Looking Glass

Delhi Poster:
One Page Classics

Calcutta Pub:
London Pub

Bangalore & Mumbai Rock Concert:
Bryan Adams

 

 
    Web Exclusives
DESPATCHES
 

West Bengal Chief Minister Buddhadev Bhattacharya reflected optimism about winning the state election when he spoke to INDIA TODAY Senior Editor Sumit Mitra at the CPI(M) headquarters in Kolkata, minutes before rushing off for campaigning.
Excerpts:

 

 
PREVIOUS ISSUE




Click here to view
the previous issue

 

 

 


India Today | The Newspaper Today | Aaj Tak | Business Today | Computers Today | India Today Plus | Teens Today | Music Today
Art Today | Jokes & Toons | India Today Book Club | TNT Astro | TNT Movies
Care Today | E-Greetings| TNT Forums | Archives | Syndications

Write to us | About Us | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer

© Living Media India Ltd