| |
ARCHAEOLOGY: CAMBAY FINDS
Earthquake Responsible For Decline
According to a study
conducted by the National Institute of Oceanography (NIO), Goa, thousands
of years ago the sea level was 6 m higher than at present. Archaeological
studies of the Gujarat coast suggest that places like Lothal were port
cities as the ocean extended till there. Then how come the structures
now identified by NIOT were submerged? According to a note prepared by
the organisation, the most probable answer is earthquakes. Research conducted
by Centre for Earth Science Studies, Thiruvananthapuram, confirm that
earthquakes have brought down land level by several metres. But S.R. Rao,
former deputy director general of ASI and scientist emeritus with NIO,
is sceptical: "The question whether the sea rose by 40 m is a ticklish
one."
|

|
|
|
BURIED TEMPLE: Experts believe
that these images of an underwater structure could be those of a
temple with a pond
|
|
Buoyed by the present findings, NIOT is speeding
up its project to undertake marine archaeology exploration at Poompuhar
off the Tamil Nadu coast, which "promises many a surprise".
The NIOT team's findings were appreciated by Department of Ocean Development
(DOD) Secretary Harsh Gupta, who is a geophysicist. Gupta contacted Union
HRD Minister Murli Manohar Joshi who was equally excited at the preliminary
evidence. "It could unearth a Harappan or pre-Harappan civilisation,"
he says. However, experts advise caution. Says Rao, "Unless there
is definite datable object we cannot say it is as old as the Harappan
civilisation."
|
|

|
|
|
GREAT BATH: A huge tank with steps on the sides closely resembles
the Great Bath found in Harappa
|
Finding datable objects poses a challenge for
NIOT. It has vast expertise in marine and under-sea data collection and
analyses, but it will have to tide over not just nature's fury, but also
the handicap of poor equipment. For one, its two vessels-Sagar Purvi and
Sagar Paschimi-are not good enough to carry and manoeuvre heavy equipment
like a shallow-bed crawler or a remote-operated vehicle (ROV). Moreover,
these vessels do not have a dynamic positioning system that enables stability
while handling crawlers and other heavy equipment. The currents in the
Gulf of Cambay are as strong as eight knots (roughly 5 m per second),
which the Sagar Paschimi has to overcome with its two 160-HP engines.
"There are times," says G. Janakiraman, in charge of the NIOT
vessels, "when even at full throttle, the vessel is pushed back by
the current. We have to face the current directly or risk being toppled."
Kathiroli recounts the many times their vessel was grounded as the depth
of the sea suddenly decreased by more than 10 m. "Suddenly we find
ourselves hitting the bottom and stuck. We pray and wait for a tide strong
enough to buoy us up."
|

|
|
|
PEBBLE WONDER: Ravindran with the search equipment
|
|
| IS
IT A HARAPPAN SITE? |
|
|
# Some experts date it as 6,000 years old,
but it can only be proven when divers come up with evidence.
# The images do reveal structures typical
of the Harappan great bath.
# Like other Harappan cities it was possibly
a riverine settlement.
# Earthquakes may have resulted in the
sinking of this city.
|
|
Carrying the shallow-bed crawler that weighs
10 tonnes will need more powerful engine and at least 50 sq m of free
deck space. "We need a bigger sea-going vessel with ample space and
power," says Ravindran. The cost factor is another impediment. NIOT
needs at least Rs 1 crore to keep a bigger ship, like DOD's Sagar Kanya,
in the Gulf of Cambay for 20 days.
The investment might be worth it. The Cambay
find needs a lot more evidence to give it shape. Says Rao, author of the
Lost City of Dwarka: "Whether they are manmade objects can only be
ascertained if a diver goes and examines it. Also, it is important to
get datable pottery. We established Dwarka to date back to 1600 b.c. through
thermoluminescence. If it is Harappan, there should be plenty of pottery."
Sending divers 40 m deep to collect samples
is a trying proposition. The exploration of Dwarka in 1981 looks like
child's play compared to this operations. Divers could spend a long time
underwater collecting material from the Dwarka site, which is just 5 m
deep. In the Gulf of Cambay, the tidal variations are up to 11 m, which
means that a four-storey building will get submerged twice a day. Even
expert divers from the Indian Navy cannot stay underwater for more than
20 minutes in the interregnum between the tides. Hence, the need for ROVs
and sea-bed crawlers.
ROVs can travel under sea to survey and collect
visual images, which will be a great improvement on the acoustic images.
At present, NIOT has a battery-operated ROV with a 5-HP engine, which
is grossly inadequate to deal with the 8-knot currents. A 10-15 HP ROV
can do the job. Also, the shallow-bed crawler can videograph and pump
out sediment samples from the ocean bed to the vessel. In between the
tides, divers can take a quick plunge to retrieve any material which could
be carbon-dated to ascertain the age.
Once established, it would be the first such
archaeological excavation in the Gulf of Cambay, where world-class navigators
fear to tread. And perhaps the best catch ever for any marine archaeologist.
-With Stephen David in Bangalore
|
|