| |
ECONOMY: MONSOON
Good Monsoon So What?
For good and bad, the rain god's hold on Indian
agriculture is waning, weakening the traditional link between the monsoon
and the economy
By Rohit Saran
It's
a bit of a damp squib. Sure, the Indian Meteorological Department (IMD)
has forecast that 2001 will once again be a normal monsoon year. Sure,
it will be the 14th consecutive year that there won't be a drought. Sure,
this should boost agricultural production and rural demand, stimulate
industrial recovery, and propel the Indian economy into a higher-than-6-per
cent growth orbit. But then why aren't farmers, businessmen and economists
ecstatic about the prospects of an economic turnaround?
Well, for good and for bad, it does not quite
work that way in the new Indian economy. For proof, look no further than
the pattern of agricultural production in recent years: in four of the
past six years, it has registered a fall. The monsoon was normal in all
these years. In the past two years, 1999-2000 and 2000-1001, the agricultural
output has shrunk continuously. That demolishes the assumption of a correlation
between a good monsoon and good agriculture. More significantly, it implies
that the traditional linkages between the monsoon and the economy-good
rainfall leading to good crops, leading to higher rural incomes, leading
to higher demand for products and services, leading to higher employment
and income-are weakening.
But what really is a normal monsoon? For sticklers
of definition, if the rainfall during the four months of June to September
averages between 79.2 and 96.8 cm (88 cm plus/minus 10 per cent), it's
described as normal by the IMD. Technically termed the southwest monsoon,
the season accounts for almost 80 per cent of the total annual rainfall
in the country. By this definition, the monsoon has undoubtedly been normal
every single year since 1988.
There are two inherent limitations of this definition.
It is the distribution of rainfall over time and space and not merely
the total volume of rain during the season that determines the agricultural
production. The IMD's forecast doesn't throw much light on these aspects.
Statistically, a combination of excess and scanty rainfall in different
regions of the country could average out to normal monsoon for the country
as a whole. That's exactly what has happened in many of the normal monsoon
years since 1988. In 1999 and 2000, for instance, more than one-third
of the country's cropped area was rain deficient (see chart). In fact,
71 of 569 districts have been reeling under drought for two years. This
includes some of the major agricultural regions like Madhya Pradesh (32
districts), Rajasthan (26 districts), Gujarat (16 districts) Uttar Pradesh
(nine districts) and Haryana (eight districts). In contrast, some regions
of Andhra Pradesh, Bihar, West Bengal and Himachal Pradesh were severely
flooded due to excessive rainfall last year. Yet, by definition, the country
had a normal monsoon.
Little or no attention is paid to what is called
the northeast monsoon that becomes active over southern India between
October and December. Tamil Nadu and parts of Andhra Pradesh get up to
60 per cent of rainfall in these months. Last year, the northeast monsoon
was abysmal, with 31 out of 35 meteorological divisions in the country
having suffered rain deficiency. Says Ashima Goyal, professor at Indira
Gandhi Institute for Development Research: "The big picture of a
normal monsoon masks the small images of subnormal rains in different
parts of the country."
Don't mistake this for a semantic debate on
definitions. A more accurate definition and forecasting of monsoon will
make monsoon a real arbiter of economic fortune in India, especially because
over 60 per cent of Indians live in rural areas.
On its part, the IMD is trying to improve forecasting
techniques. Since 1999, it has started disaggregated monsoon forecasts
dividing the country into three broad regions. It also continuously changes
and modifies the 16 parameters used to arrive at a forecast. According
to S.R. Kalsi, the deputy director general of IMD, attempts are also on
to develop forecasting models to predict district-wise monsoon. Difficult
undoubtedly, but if and when such forecasts are made available the correlation
between the strength of monsoon and health of the economy will become
stronger, and easier to establish.
"The
demand-pull effect of a good monsoon has waned."
-Arun Bharat Ram, Former President,
CII
|
|