| |
BOOKS
Memory Lapse
A stale product from the Partition
industry.
By Makarand
Paranjape
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|

|
| The essays equate the Partition solely with Punjab |
Pakistan
and Partition ... always make good copy," says Saumya Gupta, one
of the contributors to this volume of translations, commentaries and criticism.
Is this why we've seen such a surge in the literature on the Partition
in the past few years? Even so, shouldn't such literature, at the least,
offer fresh perspectives on that traumatic splintering which not only
coincided with our Independence, but cast its long shadow over whatever
we've been doing or have done since? Sadly, I'm not sure if this brave
effort actually manages to do that. Except for one somewhat fastidious,
self-conscious, but original and engaging essay by Arjun Mahey, Translating
Partition is at best a convenient teaching tool and useful compendium
of already available views on the subject.
 |
TRANSLATING PARTITION
Ed by Ravi Kant & Tarun K. Saint
Katha
Price: Rs 250
Pages: 238 |
Of course, you have new translations of well-known
partition stories here, such as "Tetwal ka Kutta" and "Toba
Tek Singh" by Saadat Hasan Manto, "Kitne Pakistan" by Kamleshwar,
"Pali" by Bhisham Sahni, "Khayal Surat" by Surendra
Prakash and "Dariyaon Pyasa" by Joginder Paul. This is definitely
a positive sign.
In addition, the editors have also included an
original English story, "Phoenix Fled" by Attia Hosain and a
translation of "Dibacha", Manto's satirical foreword to Beghair
Unwaan ke. The four critical commentaries in the second section are of
varying competence, none striking or especially insightful. Again, nearly
all the essays in the overview section do not necessarily reflect any
special understanding or intuition. Moreover, this collection once again
makes the mistake of equating the Partition solely with what happened
in Punjab.
I won't end without some questions about Manto,
who has emerged as the unquestioned "champion" of Partition
authors. Is this because he is so utterly devoid of squeamishness and
sentimentalism? Or because he offers an unblinking reflection of our own
moral corruption? Or because a figure such as M.K. Gandhi is totally and
deliberately absent from his work?
|
|