|
COVER STORY: INDO-PAK SPECIAL
THROUGH DEEDS, NOT WORDS
By
G. Parthasarathy
We are inclined to believe that every Pakistani ruler
is different from his predecessor. But from Zia to Nawaz Sharif, all have
pursued the same course.
It was a pleasant
evening in 1983 in Karachi when I met Begum Nusrat Bhutto at one of those
parties where liquor flowed freely, even as General Zia was vowing to
make Pakistan a devoutly Islamic country. "Your husband was a consummate
politician. What possessed him to overlook five generals and trust Zia-ul
Haq to be his army chief?" I asked. She recounted that when her husband
visited Multan in 1973, General Zia, then the corps commander, met him
and claimed he was a devout Muslim. Zia added that he recognised that
Bhutto had saved Pakistan from further disasters after 1971. He then went
on to swear on the holy Koran that he would always remain loyal and faithful.
Bhutto's trust was amply repaid when Zia ousted him in 1977 and then hanged
him.
Before he died, P.N. Haksar acknowledged his
mistake in advising Indira Gandhi to accept Bhutto's private assurances,
especially on Kashmir, and not insist on incorporating these in writing.
We are unfortunately inclined to believe that every Pakistani ruler is
different from his predecessor, that we should forget the past and trust
the new messiah. When Vajpayee took the bus to Lahore, few remembered
it was Nawaz Sharif and his ISI chief Javed Nasir who masterminded the
Mumbai blasts of 1993. Sharif found it expedient to welcome Vajpayee as
he was then trying to seek a dialogue with India because of economic compulsions
and the international pressure after the 1998 nuclear tests.
|

|
|
|
DEAD WEIGHT OF PAST: Kargil was a lesson for India on how never
to trust Pakistan
|
|
General Musharraf needs a dialogue with India.
He will use his visit to establish his legitimacy internationally and
among his own people. He will avoid any commitment on reducing cross-border
terrorism till his demands, including the reduction of Indian forces in
Kashmir, are met. He will try to create a situation where he can tell
the world that India is "not sincere" in resolving the Kashmir
dispute. The entire effort will be to undermine the primacy of the Simla
Agreement and the Lahore Declaration, while seeking a new framework that
focuses on Kashmir. It would be a grave folly to agree to any such proposal.
Pakistan is engaged in destabilisation throughout
India. It is the home of criminals who masterminded the Mumbai blasts,
terrorists who hijacked IC 814 and militants from the Babbar Khalsa. It
openly proclaims support for jehad against us. It uses Nepal and Bangladesh
to spread fundamentalism, terrorism and separatism in India.
The essence of good diplomacy lies in expanding
cooperation while firmly making our concerns known. We should prepare
to move ahead on people to people contacts, trade and nuclear and conventional
confidence-building measures. We should tell Musharraf there can be no
compromise on our territorial integrity and that progress can be made
only when the ISI support for terrorism ends. We should judge Musharraf
by what he does, not what he says.
(The author is former Indian high commissioner to
Pakistan)
|