|
COVER STORY: INDO-PAK SPECIAL
LITTLE CHANCE OF SUCCESS
By
Hamid Gul
Any dialogue that takes place under pressure cannot
work. In Agra, Vajpayee and Musharraf will at best agree to keep the dialogue
going.
General Musharraf
has already offered a hand of friendship by accepting Prime Minister Vajpayee's
invitation but the crucial question is: what will come of this? Several
such summits have been held in the past but nothing substantial has ever
come out of them because India is the usurper. Pakistan has never held
back when it comes to the issue of Kashmir but India is uncomfortable
about discussing it.
A solemn commitment was made to the Kashmiris
by the Indian leadership. They were to be given a choice to decide their
future and it is the denial of this right that is at the heart of the
problem between the two countries. If Vajpayee does not seriously discuss
Kashmir, Musharraf's visit might well turn out to be a waste of time.
Just like the Lahore bus journey.
|

|
|
|
PAPER TIGERS: Both Vajpayee and Musharraf feel the other is under
international pressure
|
|
India has only two alternatives. To either negotiate
Kashmir or risk a nuclear war. I know that the Indian armed forces are
getting very restive and want to see Pakistan defeated on the battleground
but that comes with nuclear risks. We saw what happened during Kargil.
The threat of escalation led to intervention by President Clinton. Vajpayee's
invitation to Musharraf obviously has its origins in America. The Indian
prime minister is working under pressure and the lure of incentives. There
are no free lunches in Washington. India offered talks under American
pressure and expects sanctions to be lifted in return. It also has an
eye on a seat in the United Nations Security Council.
It would do well for both India and Pakistan
to remember that any dialogue that takes place under pressure cannot work.
There has to be an intrinsic logic that suits the two parties concerned.
What progress are you going to make by reclaiming Azad Kashmir? That is
not going to bring peace to Kashmir. And why this persistent question
of whether Musharraf can rein in the jehadis or not? Why should he? What
wrong are they doing in Kashmir by waging a freedom struggle? They are
only agitating for a right which is stubbornly being denied to them. How
can India talk of itself as a great democratic nation when it opposes
a vote? And why at a time when the Indian security forces are feeling
the heat?
In Agra, the two sides will at best agree to
demilitarise Siachen but that will put pressure on Musharraf. How can
he return to Pakistan with that? For, in Siachen it is the Indian soldier
who is feeling the pinch again. To my mind, the two will at best agree
to keep the dialogue going. I expect no great breakthrough because I don't
think India has had a change of heart vis-a-vis Kashmir. Unless that happens
it will be difficult to see Vajpayee in the mould of, say, Nixon.
(The author is a former chief of the Inter-Services
Intelligence)
|