| |
COVER STORY:
ARJUNA AWARD
IF WALLS COULD TALK
The Arjuna Awards
panel is supposed to be composed of eight people: the Union sports minister
and the minister of state for sports, two departmental secretaries, the
SAI's director-general and the executive director of its teams wing; the
presidents of the IOA and the AAA. But according to an official, close
to 20 people attend the meetings, the eight panellists supported by a
platoon of junior staff. A SAI official witness to one of these august
gatherings says, "Merit is absolutely no consideration in the discussions.
Just as every railway minister starts a new service for his constituency,
every sports minister first gives out Arjuna Awards to the athletes of
his own region." The officials who worked with Bharati's predecessor
Sukhdev Singh Dhindsa claim they have even heard him say, "Abhi Punjab
se bahut log ho gaye, let's select some people from other states as well."
|
|
SOLUTIONS
|
| |
"Set
up an independent committee of sportspersons to name the awardees."
Michael Ferreira, Cueist
"Why
should you have to apply for an honour? The rules should be clear
cut."
G.S. Randhawa, Athlete
"Milkha
is being petty but political interference in the awards must stop."
Adille Sumariwalla, Athlete
"The
money paid should be done away with. After all, the award is not
charity."
Ajit Pal Singh, Hockey Player
|
The case that has embarrassed the ministry-one
bureaucrat called it "indefensible"-and enraged Milkha the most
is that of Rachna Govil, a SAI deputy director who has been given the
Arjuna Award for lifetime's contribution to athletics. Govil's sole athletic
achievement is a victory in the Allahabad half-marathon where women competitors
were supposed to have numbered three. She says she has competed in two
international events in Hisar as well as in zonal shooting events. The
recommendation for Govil came from within the ministry, with Bharati instructing
the panel that there were to be no arguments. The pressure to give Govil
the award came from a well-networked Thakur politician from Uttar Pradesh.
When Govil stands before the President to receive her award and hears
an account of her career being recited, there will be more than a few
people wincing.
Similar is the case of another "lifetime"
awardees-Kalpana Debnath, gymnast, coach and now warden of the National
Institute of Sports (NIS) girls hostel in Patiala. On the NIS campus,
there is no celebration for Debnath, only disbelief and embarrassment.
Her name was recommended by NIS Executive Director Colonel B.S. Ahluwalia
and she is a protege of national gymnastics coach G. S. Bawa. The Gymnastics
Federation of India has repeatedly turned down appeals from Sarbir Singh,
coach of an Arjuna awardee himself, to put up his name for any kind of
national sporting award.
|

|
|
|
BROKEN PROMISE: Asian Games gold medal
winner Makhan wants to sell his Arjuna Award
|
|
Not just the Arjuna but the national coaching
award, the Dronacharya, is also riddled with inconsistencies. One of five
Dronacharyas was awarded to Gurdial Singh Bhangu, national women's hockey
coach, sacked by the Indian Women's Hockey Federation last year after
his team finished at the bottom of the Olympic qualifiers. National shooting
coach Sunny Thomas' name was recommended for the Dronacharya but was turned
down. The shooting Arjuna Award for lifetime contribution went to Gurbir
Singh Sandhu instead. "He has no individual achievement," says
National Rifle Association of India (NRAI) Secretary General Baljit Sethi.
"We recommended his son Manavjit for the award earlier, not him.
He is a business partner of Randhir Singh." IOA Secretary-General
Randhir Singh replies, "We used to do business earlier, not anymore.
The NRAI has itself backed shooters who only have team medals." Manavjit
is one of them, says his father. The lifetime achievement award instituted
in 1995 to make up for lapses in the past has been turned into a lobby
fest. The ministry has indicated that the lifetime awards may be stopped
after 2000. This led the IOA to instruct federations to recommend as many
names as they could muster. They filled so many onto the last departing
boat that it has actually sunk.
In the ruckus created by the Milkha refusal,
there is a furious finger-pointing on: the ministry pointing at rules
that encourage people to leap through loopholes, sports officials at the
government for not knowing sport from sea kelp, and the bureaucracy at
sports officials for backing weak candidates. Given that sports officials
are often people in the government and the bureaucracy, it is a far cosier
club than it seems. Today, the faction fight in Indian sport is still
split along familiar political lines: the BJP's Bharati versus Congress'
Suresh Kalmadi, now the IOA president.
|
|