| |
SPORTS: CRICKET
Dual Powered
An unlikely friendship between India's captain and
his deputy holds the key to the team's future
By Sharda Ugra in Colombo
|
|
|
|
|
LEADING LIGHTS: Dravid and Ganguly
|
Sourav
Ganguly and Rahul Dravid are standing in the opulent lobby of the Taj
Samudra in Colombo listening to talk of the wild world of Indian cricket.
The people around them are discussing the board elections in September
and when the familiar name of a prospective office-bearer is named, a
sly smile crosses Ganguly's face. "Jam, heard that? If that happens,
pack your bags." Dravid, who must have inarguably the most moronic
nickname in world cricket, replies, "Why only me? You pack your bags
too. Bye-bye." Then the captain of the Indian cricket team and his
vice-captain giggle at their own private joke like a pair of schoolboys.
It was not merely a nicely staged bit of image-building
during what's been an endless examination of the strength and cohesiveness
of the Indian team's current decision-making unit. This after all is the
tour during which Ganguly felt it necessary to have Dravid by his side
to tell the travelling press pack that all was well between them, despite
reports to the contrary coming from India. A few days later former board
president Raj Singh Dungarpur walks up to Dravid in Kandy and tells him,
within earshot of a junior teammate, to "be ready" to be captain.
A coup was being not-so-subtly planned but Dungarpur got his target wrong.
The captain and his deputy have formed a partnership as unlikely as that
of a trapeze artist and a mathematician. But critically, it is as strong
as Rodgers & Hammerstein or (since the adventures of their team often
resemble an improbable Hindi film) at least Salim-Javed. There's no monster
hit yet but it's there somewhere in the destinies of these two cricketers
whose careers have run on parallel but are also inextricably intertwined
tracks . With their rapid rise to seniority in a very raw Indian side,
the Dravid-Ganguly association has grown deeper.
|

|
|
|
"Rahul is
the same guy I first ran into in our junior years-poised, intense
and very, very serious. But he has grown up into a top-class player.
He is a fighter."
SOURAV GANGULY
|
|
|
"Sourav is
tough, willing to listen and to learn. The best part about our relationship
is we can agree to disagree."
RAHUl DRAVID
|
|
Think back to the dying moments of the home series
against Australia. Harbhajan Singh hits the winning runs, Ganguly jumps
off his chair in joy and then first thing, looks for his deputy and leaps
into his arms. In Kandy, Dravid tells the hounded and hopelessly out-of-form
Ganguly again and again, "You're always one afternoon away from greatness."
It becomes Ganguly's life-raft, his mantra and when the time comes to
stem the storm, he has Dravid at the other end. Chasing 264 to square
the series, even as the merchants of doom predict surrender, Dravid scores
75 and the Bengal left-hander his first fifty in 14 innings. They fashion
another turnaround victory and the beleaguered Ganguly finds himself in
the company of the disdainful Pataudi and Bishen Bedi as the only Indian
captain to win three Tests away from home. If in another couple of seasons,
should Ganguly and Dravid look back at Sri Lanka 2001, they may well discover
that this was the tour where they came of age as leaders of what is turning
out to be a brave new team.
Despite the greatest respect both men have for
him, the shadow of Sachin Tendulkar has been a substantial one. It has
both dominated and shielded them. With Tendulkar absent due to injury,
the shadow was gone and so was the shelter. They could have been blinded
by the sudden light but have not. They could have let respect atrophy
into over-reliance but chose another path instead. What they did was pass
the old tea-bag test. People, it's said, are like tea bags-you don't know
how strong they are until you put them in hot water. In Sri Lanka, things
were boiling. The first Test was gone inside four days and that was the
time all the bad old Indian habits could have resurfaced. First to go
was harmony, rapidly followed by self-belief and the seepage of that old
toxin, total indifference. The team even had the excuse: in the Test series
they were not only without Tendulkar but the side's most experienced bowlers,
Srinath and Kumble, and two of their most successful players of this year,
V.V.S. Laxman and Ashish Nehra. Ganguly was asking travelling journalists
whether they had brought their whites and manager Anand Mate, well into
his fifties, was heading for the hotel gym every day.
Up 1-0, the Sri Lankans admitted that they thought
they had knocked most of the fight out of India. "You would think
that without Tendulkar, you had a good chance, specially after going 1-0
up and that it would put a little bit more pressure on Ganguly and Dravid,"
captain Sanath Jayasuriya told India Today.
For the Indians, it is the fightback rather
than the final outcome of the Test series that is more important. It has
proved at least a few things: that the team has leaders who are not afraid
of leading. "I don't think you know what you can do unless the responsibility
actually lands on you," says Dravid. It has crash-landed and Ganguly
and Dravid, backed by coach John Wright, have become better at picking
up the pieces and assembling a coherent whole.
When one-Test veteran Mohammed Kaif batted on
the grassy practice wickets in Galle in a blaze of flashy shotmaking,
Dravid was quick to go over to the nets and advise him that playing on
seaming tracks meant being watchful and choosy about which ball to hit.
Deep in his own batting gloom, Ganguly took aside paceman Zaheer Khan
and, with Dravid, sat him down before the second Test. Khan who had been
caned by Jayasuriya in the first Test told India Today, "They showed
the kind of confidence that makes a world of difference to a player just
starting out. They told me that I had great ability and that no one could
play me if I was doing things right. That wickets were mine to take."
Khan and Venkatesh Prasad opened the doors for the Indian win in Kandy
with a burst on the third morning that wrecked the Lankans.
|
|