| |
STATES: MADHYA PRADESH
Intense Lobbying
| |

|
| |
"I am only backing the demands of
the people."
Rajendra Prasad Shukla, Speaker, Chhattisgarh
Assembly
|
| |
PRO-CHHATTISGARH
# Amarkantak depends on Pendra, a Chhattisgarh district, for business
needs.
# The people prefer Chhattisgarh as it has better infrastructure,
be it roads or power.
# Richer mineral deposits in the state, so economic opportunities
for people.
|
| |
|
| |
"Amarkantak will remain a part of
the Vindhyas."
Sriniwas Tiwari, Speaker, Madhya Pradesh Assembly
|
| |
PRO-MADHYA PRADESH
|
| |
# Amarkantak was never a part of the Chhattisgarh region.
# A dispute over the pilgrim centre will add another state to
the Narmada tangle.
# There is an organised movement to oppose Chhattisgarh's demand.
|
The pro-Chhattisgarh
lobby has found a strong advocate in the state's Speaker Rajendra Prasad
Shukla, who is preparing to exploit the situation for political advantage.
Kota, his assembly constituency, is right next door and he would like
Amarkantak included in it to better safeguard his electoral interests.
Shukla also has strong links with several ashrams in the pilgrim centre.
By raising the issue he may succeed in creating a popular image for himself
in his own constituency. "I am only backing the demand of the people
as they are dependent on Pendra for their various needs,'' he says.
The Chhattisgarh Government is backing Shukla's
efforts. The state Forest Department has been proactive in mapping district
borders, and forest rangers and revenue officials have been quick to erect
pillars and barbed-wire fencing. While laying the foundation stone for
a railway guest house in Amarkantak Chhattisgarh Governor D.N. Sahay is
believed to have assured the people that it would soon be brought into
the state's fold. Shukla was with the governor on the occasion.
This sparked off protests in Shahdol and Rajendragram,
the block headquarters. Leaders from both the BJP and the Congress took
up cudgels for retaining Amarkantak in Madhya Pradesh. "As the constitutional
head Sahay should have desisted from making such provocative statements,''
says Lallu Singh, former BJP MLA from Shahdol. But Chhattisgarh Chief
Minister Ajit Jogi too has supported the informal demand to begin procedures
to include Amarkantak in the state.
All this manipulation by Chhattisgarh politicians
has infuriated Sriniwas Tiwari, Speaker of the Madhya Pradesh Assembly,
who is heading a movement for the formation of a separate Vindhya Pradesh.
"We will not tolerate attempts by any Chhattisgarh leader to take
way Amarkantak. It has always been an integral part of the Vindhyas and
will remain thus,'' he says. Though agitators are not as yet fighting
police barricades or leading huge rallies to the state capitals, the peaceful
manner of Chhattisgarh's formation has made Amarkantak locals hopeful
that one day they will be allowed to merge with the new state. Meanwhile
Madhya Pradesh is hoping that improved roads and power supply will quell
any demand for Amarkantak's merger with Chhattisgarh.
|
|