|
COVER
STORY: TERRORISM
Mood in America
Clueless in Manhattan
Weeks after the attack, Americans are confused
about what their country will do to tackle Osama bin Laden
| |
|
| |
MASKED FEAR: A customer tries on the last gas mask at a
military store
|
In post-September
11 America, trauma is a national affliction, confusion a national pastime.
Shaken Americans are buying gas masks and antibiotics. Admission to Arab
language courses has increased as students seek to learn the language
of "the enemy". Such "homeland defence"-the current
buzzphrase-is the stuff of tangible action. Understanding the world and
a complexity described eloquently by a New Yorker as "Pakistan, Uzbekistan
and all those other stans" is another thing.
In a media-driven society, the TV anchor is
supposed to have all the answers. But today even he seems flummoxed. The
cluelessness becomes obvious when "specialists" hint that soldiers
might prepare for Afghanistan's terrain with manoeuvres in arid Arizona.
The redoubtable William Safire in all seriousness wrote in The New York
Times of mobilising "Muslim clergy-who know their Koran and have
special credibility ... to work with our Islamic allies". This army
would invade Taliban lands, aided by an "aggressive Radio Free Afghanistan".
The same day, Washington said it would use Voice
of America and Pakistani radio stations to broadcast propaganda telling
the Afghans that bin Laden was not a good Muslim, obviously inspired by
Radio Free Liberty, once used against the Soviet Bloc. America hasn't
had a conflict since the Cold War and it shows.
Like the Indian Government during the Kandahar
hijack of 1999, the US spent days waiting for the "moderates in the
Taliban"-a commodity as rare as a Marxist in the Republican Party-to
defect. General Musharraf was supposed to win them over. American reporters
went around Karachi and Lahore and came to the conclusion that most Pakistanis
were against the Taliban and would back American intervention. But within
a week, it became apparent that nobody other than imaginative reporters
was serious about invading Afghanistan using US soldiers based in Pakistan.
Islamabad was grudgingly recognised as unreliable. So it was time to focus
on Uzbekistan and Tajikistan, the likely launching pads. Two facts stood
out. One, Secretary of State Colin Powell denounced the Srinagar bombing
by a Pakistan-based group. Two, that Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfield's
crucial Asian trip didn't include Pakistan.
The main factor fuelling America's anxiety is
the intellectual illiteracy that keeps even foreign affairs specialists
from knowing that Iranians are not Arabs and can be allies. Then there's
the media. Used to "confidential briefings" during the Clinton
years, it gets no information from the Bush regime, manned by Cold War
veterans. So a whole nation is busy second guessing. Americans, from President
George W. Bush downwards, are asking the world to choose their enemies.
Before that, America would do well to choose its friends.
Ashok Malik in New York
|