| |
THE NATION: CONGRESS
OBITUARY
POPULAR MAHARAJ
Madhavrao Scindia
1945-2001
| |
|
| |
ELECTED KING: Scindia
never lost any election since his debut in 1971
|
Madhavrao Scindia,
who died in a tragic aircrash last week, stood out in many ways in the
political party, the Congress, which he joined of his own volition in
the last quarter-century of his life. He was 56, being born a couple of
years before the Union Jack was to give way to the tricolour and the 500-odd
Indian feudatories-including the 21-gun salute-holders like his Gwalior-were
to pay obeisance to the new order. He took time, like all other privy-purse
holders. After all, which prince would like to join a political congregation
committed to destroying the dynastic order?
Although he entered public life in 1971 as a
Jan Sangh MP for Guna, Scindia parted ways with his mother Vijayaraje
Scindia during the Emergency. He never looked back at the old order comprising
his mother, her fond beliefs and the old courtiers. From 1980, Scindia,
or Bhaiya, as the only brother of three sisters was called by his intimates,
was a central figure in the Congress. In 1984, when Atal Bihari Vajpayee
lost out to Scindia by a margin of over 2,00,000 votes in Gwalior, one
of Bhaiya's election workers commented that the "throne" was
not "negotiable". He never lost an election.
The politician prince was always a paradox in
the Congress-not quite rated as the person who could take control, yet
regarded as one closest to the ruling Gandhi dynasty. He knew Congress
President Sonia Gandhi more than anyone else in the party, having been
a friend of Rajiv Gandhi since his days in Cambridge. In public functions,
he wore the khadi dress with a tricolour scarf. In private, he preferred
smart casuals and his cigar. In his several visits to the swankiest nightclubs
of London and Paris, he was photographed in designer suits. At the back
of these sartorial, and attitudinal, flip-flops, however, was an intention
to capture the middle ground of the Congress which had been left bare
by the death of Sanjay Gandhi in an aircrash in 1980 and the assassination
of Rajiv in 1991.
That Scindia had a powerful eye for governance
was evident in his tenures as minister in charge of railways and later
civil aviation. As the minister for railways he started the Shatabdi trains
which allowed the overnight traveller from Delhi or the short-distance
traveller to reach his destination quickly. As the civil aviation minister,
he started the "open sky" policy which has today led to competition
in both international and domestic aviation. At the same time, he wasn't
a reformer in the ideological sense. He liked being a competent manager
in a command economy.
Was he the best person to lead the Congress
now? That's a big question. He had Sonia on his side but never possessed
a killer instinct. Even when he took on P.V. Narasimha Rao after the hawala
case in 1996, he lacked the determination to take the battle to its logical
end. And in 1991, he didn't even try seriously.
Scindia, despite being in the thick of politics,
always retained a sense of regal aloofness. He was a patrician not a populist.
Madhya Pradesh Chief Minister Digvijay Singh knew Scindia from childhood,
yet was often cut up enough with him to remember stories about his early
years when he and the young Madhavrao-both started in the Jan Sangh- fought
over the definition of Hinduism. "He (Scindia) spoke a different
language from us," Digvijay said in an interview to India Today last
year. Recently, he was entrusted the task of organising the party's campaign
for the forthcoming assembly elections in Uttar Pradesh. His fatal trip
to Kanpur was its end-game.
In Indian politics, differences between the
perceptions of parties have begun dissolving. How much difference is there
after all between the BJP and the Congress on crucial matters of governance?
Not much. Scindia was a leader whose considerable charm often enabled
him to bridge the divide between the Congress and the BJP. But it was
purely at a social level. He could never claim his pre-eminence because
he was always overshadowed in the two decades of his life in the Congress
by the Gandhi family. Nevertheless, he liked being at the centre of decision-making
in matters of importance. But never at the top. He was the King who, somehow,
never had the will to be a ruler.
Sumit Mitra
|
|