| |
COVER STORY: RUSSIAN EXPERIENCE
Ground Realities
|
|

|
| |
STRATEGIC MOVES: Military action alone cannot win the war
in Afghanistan
|
Especially in ground
operations. "If troop positions are disguised or if they are hiding
in caves, satellite intelligence won't find them," asserts Gareyev.
Air strikes alone will not help the US catch all the terrorists even if
they fight for many years because of the country's difficult terrain-mountains,
deserts and caves. So effective intelligence is a must if the US is to
make progress on the ground. The US special forces tried to carry out
a number of ground operations, but I think they were unsuccessful, speculates
Gareyev. So while the US may be able to destroy stockpiles, groups of
troops, command points, anti-aircraft defenses and artillery positions,
it is impossible to track an individual down as he moves across towns
through irrigation canals. Nearly every town has hundreds of kilometres
of such canals three to four metres deep and are covered with earth, reveals
Gareyev.
|
|
|
|
"The Americans
seem to be repeating our mistakes."
General Makhmud Gareyev, former adviser to Afghan president
Najibullah
|
|
The ground operations may also be affected by
the onset of winter though this is unlikely to affect the air strikes.
"Winter isn't a problem for modern aircraft or missiles," says
Gareyev. "The air strikes will continue and there will be support
for the anti-Taliban forces. As for continued operations during Ramzan
(in November), the Pentagon hasn't taken a decision yet," he adds.
Moiseyev believes the Taliban and its opponents are unlikely to fight
on the ground during the Muslim holy month. And though Pakistani President
General Pervez Musharraf has spoken in favour of halting the bombing during
Ramzan, US Secretary of State Colin Powell has put off the decision saying
America would take into account not just military but also diplomatic
considerations.
Sudjayev, meanwhile, is worried about the length
of the military operations. "I think the anti-terrorist operations
have already become drawn out. Active fighting can probably get under
way only in late winter or early spring once the Islamic holidays are
over and the snow melts," he speculates.
As for the success that America is likely to
achieve in waging its war against terrorism in Afghanistan, Gareyev says,
"I think the US can have an impact on Afghanistan as a base for terrorism
but it won't be able to liquidate all the terrorists." Bombing is
not enough to fight terrorism, says the general, the root of evil needs
to be eradicated. Terrorism is big business, with drug production in Afghanistan
alone raking in millions of dollars, much of which goes to Osama bin Laden.
So tackling terrorism entails locating the sources and organisers of the
drug trade.
The problem also lies in people's perception
of US ideology: many believe it wants to enhance its prosperity at the
expense of other countries, and to some extent, this is responsible for
terrorism, surmises Gareyev.
The country's unilateral military action is
also a cause for concern among several nations, says Moiseyev. While Russia
condemned the NATO aggression against Yugoslavia, it is supporting the
US operations against the terrorist bases in Afghanistan. In 10 years
of post-Soviet history, Russia has not conducted any military operations
abroad except for peacekeeping missions in the Balkans, Sierra Leone and
the CIS. "But these operations were all planned and implemented by
the UN and the collective decision-making bodies of the CIS," says
Moiseyev. "Russia only implemented their decisions. The US, on the
other hand, sometimes plans military campaigns and acts as it sees fit.
This causes concern in the world community."
Moiseyev, however, is all for supporting forces
opposed to the current regime in Kabul. "I think the US and Russia
should actively support the anti-Taliban forces to help them clear the
country of religious fanatics."
The nature of impact that such an exercise will
have on Afghanistan is a matter of speculation. But "history shows
that any attempts to establish strong central power in Afghanistan end
in failure," says Gareyev. The Tajiks and Uzbeks should have a certain
degree of autonomy with the Pashtoons taking the leading role, he believes.
"I don't think we will see an ethnic group trying to secede because
this would mean the war will never end. The Pashtoons won't let Afghanistan
be carved." In his book The Afghan Harvest, he quotes Engels, who
said of the Afghans: "Only their unbridled hatred of state power
and their love of personal independence prevents them from becoming a
powerful nation."
Despite this, says Sudjayev, "No one can
beat the Afghans." And the longer the war continues against the Taliban,
the fewer allies America will have left in Afghanistan, he adds. Perhaps
America should pay heed. Ten years, after all, is a long time to learn
lessons in defeat.
with Riju D. Mehta
|
|