| |
COVER STORY: STRATEGY
Advantage Outsiders
With the balance tilted against it, the Taliban
will soon find itself vanquished
By W.P.S. Sidhu in New York
No plan survives contact with the enemy.
Carl von Clausewitz
| |
|
| |
OVERSIGHT: Bush has failed to muster an opposing force in
south Afghanistan
|
The nature of warfare
has changed dramatically since this line was penned during the Napoleonic
wars of the 19th century, but the unpredictability of warfare has not.
Military history is replete with instances of the best-laid plans going
awry and formidable forces crumbling before unlikely adversaries. In this
respect, Afghanistan has an unassailable record as a giant-slayer: it
frustrated the Mughal empire, humbled the British and brought the Soviet
Union to its knees. This might tempt pundits to foretell the victory of
the Taliban-Al Qaida partnership over the US-led combine in the current
conflict. But war is an unpredictable business-it would be rash to forecast
such an outcome.
What is clear, however, is that several factors
tilt the balance against the Taliban-Al Qaida alliance-and none of them
has to do with the degradation of conventional military power by the American
bombing. First, in all the previous episodes the Afghan people were, more
or less, united against the "outsider", be it Mughal, British
or Russian. Today, that unity of purpose is clearly lacking, and moderate
Afghans may well support a victor who can provide a modicum of peace and
stability. Secondly, unlike the strategic depth provided to the mujahideen
in their war against the Soviets, the Taliban is bottled up in Afghanistan
by the forced alliance between Islamabad and Washington.
|
Moderate Afghans will
support a victor who can provide a modicum of peace and stability.
|
|
To increase pressure on the Taliban and having
realised the limitations of its aerial bombardment campaign-pilots ran
out of targets within three days-the US-led combine launched the first
limited airborne commando raid. Conducted on Mullah Mohammed Omar's house
in Kandahar and the nearby airfield, the raid had three objectives: it
demonstrated how to provide force protection deep in enemy territory,
explored the possibility of using the same airport for future operations
and warned the Taliban that the US was willing to take the fight to them.
But without specific and up-to-the-minute intelligence-which can only
be derived from human intelligence sources-such raids are likely to remain
unreliable.
In the north, the US turned to its new-found
friends in the Northern Alliance to play two roles. The first, to undertake
probing attacks against Taliban troops around Kabul and Mazar-e-Sharif,
and lure them to concentrate on the frontline, thus providing a more effective
target for US fighter aircraft. The limitation of this tactic, however,
became evident when some US bombs fell close to Northern Alliance positions.
The second role of the Alliance is to launch frontal ground attacks on
Taliban strongholds. This will cost the outnumbered rebels precious lives
but will keep US casualties low.
While these tactics may give the impression
of a well thought out military operation, they are, in fact, the result
of improvisation and poor cooperation. For instance, although the US is
willing to use the Northern Alliance in this dual role, it prefers to
depend on its own technical means to determine targets. Consequently,
the targets struck often do not facilitate an advance by the Northern
Alliance.
|
|