| |
SPORTS: HOCKEY
Hope From Hobart
The Junior World Cup victory puts the sport on
the crossroads again. Decisions taken from now on could either build or
break the national team.
By Sharda Ugra
|
|
|
|
|
GOLDEN
BOYS: The Indian hockey team with the Junior World Cup trophy
|
One night during
the junior men's hockey World Cup India captain Gagan Ajit Singh sat in
his hotel room in Hobart, stuck at the bottom of the world. Hobart is
a long way Down Under, but Gagan was talking history, not geography. India
had just lost a crucial pool match to Australia and Gagan asked the question
Indian hockey has been asked for 20 years. How is it that every time it
really counted, someone else ended up celebrating and the Indian team
had to put its heads down and leave the field. "Yaar, hum field pe
kab nachenge (When will we be the ones dancing on the field)?" Gagan
asked roommate Arjun Halappa. "Hamara din kab aayega (When is it
going to be our day)?"
Surely now, with the Junior World Cup trophy
held up to an astonished nation, every one in Indian hockey understands.
When they plan for it, when they prepare for it, when they will it, it
can be their day. For the first time in more than 25 years India returned
from a world hockey event with something other than regrets. India has
won only three major titles in 25 years-the 1975 senior World Cup, Olympic
gold in 1980 and Asian Games gold in 1998-far too little for a country
that once painted hockey's greatest works of art but now struggles to
read its modern textbooks. The under-21 World Cup and the way it was won
could prove to be the key to the difficult translation.
Two days after the Indians had to swallow the
defeat versus Australia, they played the mighty Dutch with only one option:
victory. Coach Rajinder Singh, who spent a fitful night thinking of formations,
didn't spare his team the truth. "I told them if they couldn't win
that match, there would never be a revival of Indian hockey," he
says. That's a very heavy cross to carry even if you're not running full
tilt at goal, hockey stick in hand, white ball in focus, eyes darting,
heart pumping. But Rajinder's words freed his side. They played like it
was the final, running on a battery of self-belief and energy. The Netherlands
equalised three times, but the Indians scored still one more to win 4-3.
They beat Germany 3-2 in the semis and Argentina 6-1 in the final. Aussie
junior team coach Colin Batch was impressed. "The Indians kept improving
throughout the tournament. They attacked very quickly, but also had very
good defence, launching the ball a good 50-60m out of defence, bypassing
the midfield," he told India Today.
Attack and defence are not two sides of a coin
but the elements of the precious metal that makes it. Post-Hobart, there
is celebration over the fact that the Indians won playing "traditional"
hockey with five forwards and not the "European style". Former
Olympian and ex-coach Balkishen Singh differs. "The game that we
displayed was a mix of Indian skills and European thrust. It cannot and
must not be interpreted as a triumph of the so-called Indian classical
hockey. India has clearly evolved a new style of hockey," he says.
It's what is being worked on at the national camp, the seniors argue,
call it what you like. The tactic Batch singled out-the scoop out from
the defence-is a signature move. Rajinder explained it was taken to thwart
counter-attacks, break tight man-to-man marking and open up the play.
The precise, nimble hand of skill fitted into the glove of modern hockey-in
some parts, they're already calling this the "Eurasian" style.
Never mind the name tags. The victory was a result of a sustained programme
of training and international competition for the past three years. "The
2001 Junior World Cup was seen as a target from August 1999," says
C.R. Kumar, who coached the junior squad until earlier this year. Of the
18 players in the team, 14 have played for India at various levels: juniors,
'A' teams, second XIs, developmental teams as well as the seniors.
Most other teams in Hobart also had players
who belonged to their senior squads, including two Australian internationals
who had 100 caps between them. So while the Indian experience may have
helped, what may have worked more was that they had played in each other's
company very often.
The team was sent to Australia two weeks before
the start of the Junior World Cup for practice games and acclimatisation
to Hobart's temperatures that sometimes hit 4 degrees Celsius. Every little
bit helped. The programme now in place for Indian juniors from the under-14
levels upwards is the IHF's one bright idea that is showing results. But
its feudal management policies often threaten to undo all that good work.
Continuity in personnel is seen as dangerous and mild dissent is considered
armed rebellion. Kumar was suddenly moved out to the senior camp at the
start of the year. Rajinder, who had previously worked with the under-18s,
was announced new coach two months before the World Cup. Fortunately the
team made the most of Rajinder's expertise and ensured that Kumar's work
was not wasted. Now, when there should be talk of how to translate the
win into success at the senior level, there are calls to sack the seniors
and groom the glory boys from Hobart for the 2004 Olympics. Senior coach
Cedric D'Souza ignores it all. "The victory will give these boys
confidence-when they come into the national camp they will push the seniors,
there will be two-three guys fighting for one spot. It's a healthy competitive
atmosphere and that's fantastic," he says.
The senior World Cup-the true barometer for
India's standing in the world game-is only four months away and every
step taken from here on is critical. In 1997, India had finished runners-up
in the Junior World Cup. The desire to fast-track those players into the
senior team led to upheaval, heartburn and no less than four changes of
coaches between 1998 and 2001. Former Olympian and selector M.M. Somaya
wants perspective to prevail and the younger players to develop their
own analytical skills.
The juniors are scattered and savouring victory.
Gagan to Ferozepur where there are two hockey Olympians in his family:
father Ajit and uncle Harmeek. Player of the tournament Deepak Thakur
to Una to talk to his father, a driver with the Himachal Pradesh Government,
about how he scored 10 goals. Deep defender Jugraj Singh, whose penalty-corner
hitting is called world class, to Rayya near Amritsar for an overdue haircut.
And Halappa to Coorg where his parents want to know why his brand-new
Oakleys sunglasses, the cool sportsman's most vital accessory, cost more
than a washing machine.
To a man they are energised and empowered. What
happened to very few Indian hockey players in two decades happened to
them. Their day arrived. They danced. Someone else left quietly. Which
is why Hobart is more than an achievement or a landmark for the sport.
Hobart is hope itself. The men who run Indian hockey must now decide whether
to let that hope float or sink.
with Rohit Brijnath and bureau reports
|
|