PAKISTAN
Sudden RevivalAfter the Colombo pyrotechnics, both sides ready for talks.
By Manoj Joshi
Relations between India and
Pakistan are like the phases of the moon. At times they wane with hostility and distrust,
at other times wax with civility and bonhomie. In July-August, Pakistan declared it could
not talk to India and guns boomed across the Line of Control in Kashmir. Indian and
Pakistani diplomats who met at Colombo for the SAARC summit last month vied to demonise
each other. Suddenly the phase has changed. South Block officials are reticent, saying
nothing more than that relations are on an even keel and that both sides will now talk to
each other on Kashmir and other issues.
The change came after bilateral talks between the Indian
Foreign Secretary K. Raghunath and his Pakistani counterpart Shamshad Ahmad at the
Non-Aligned Movement summit in Durban earlier this month. The breakthrough occurred after
Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee telephoned Nawaz Sharif in Islamabad and discussed the
issue. The Pakistani prime minister had scrapped his visit to Durban because of his
domestic political difficulties. Sharif told Vajpayee that he and Foreign Minister Sartaj
Aziz could make the announcement detailing the modalities of the resumed dialogue.
However, it was felt that it would be better for the prime ministers themselves to make
the announcement after their forthcoming meeting in New York later this month where they
will be attending the UN General Assembly session.
Officials are mum about the details of the decisions that
have enabled both India and Pakistan to declare victory. But it seems clear that they are
based on a compromise crafted around the arcane diplomatic language used in the June 23,
1997, agreement that they subsequently disagreed on. This would mean that while Raghunath
and Ahmad kick off discussions on peace and security and Kashmir, dates for discussing six
other subjects, including Siachen, Wular barrage and Sir Creek, will also be announced
simultaneously. Former foreign secretary J.N. Dixit says that the already existing
agreement on these three issues has been stalled since 1991 by the Pakistanis because of
Kashmir.
Surprisingly, the quarrel that derailed the dialogue matured
during the prime ministership of Inder Kumar Gujral, a man whom no one would accuse of
being anti-Pakistan. In September 1997 when Raghunath and Ahmad met to
"operationalise" the mechanism decided on in June to discuss Indo-Pak issues
under eight heads, Pakistani officials claimed Delhi had also agreed to set up a specific
working group to address the Kashmir issue. However, afraid that Pakistan would hijack the
dialogue and focus solely on Kashmir, Delhi demurred.
Under the new arrangement with all the dates announced
simultaneously, India's call for a "composite dialogue" and Pakistan's for a
discussion on Kashmir will be accommodated. Indian officials are clear that any attempt by
Pakistan to renege on talks on other issues and harp exclusively on Kashmir would bring
the entire process to a grinding halt.
Caught in the post-Chagai quagmire, Sharif has realised that
his brinkmanship with India is generating a sense of alarm around the world, especially in
the US. After his Colombo declaration that talks with India were a "waste of
time", the US made it clear that resumption of economic aid was contingent on
Pakistan continuing talks with India. The replacement of hardliner foreign minister Gohar
Ayub with the pragmatic Aziz was also linked to this. With its other chickens coming home
to roost, Islamabad has quietly toned down the anti-Indian rhetoric and signalled its
willingness to talk. For its part, Delhi has decided that there is nothing to lose in
discussing Kashmir, whatever be the format. Dixit, a long-time votary of such talks,
notes, "There is no need to shy away from discussions. If the Pakistanis attach
priority to Kashmir, so do we." If this is the spirit in which the talks are resumed,
the Indo-Pakistani moon may not wane early. |