





|
ECONOMY:
RUPEE
Crisis Comes CallingThe rupee slide--though expected--makes borrowings expensive as
interest rates rise, sending industry and the markets into a tizzy.
By V Shankar Aiyar
The inevitability may have been unstated but the writing was
clearly on the wall. Consider the facts: the Economic Survey estimated trade deficit to be
around $6.7 billion (Rs 28,140 crore) for 1998-99. Imports in April touched $3.5 billion
(Rs 14,700 crore) while exports fell alarmingly to $876 million (Rs 3679 crore). Foreign
institutional investors (fiis) turned bearish and offloaded stocks worth Rs 981 crore in
the past two months. In between came the threat of sanctions following Pokhran II. Then
the Budget. In just five days in June, the FIIs dumped shares worth Rs 510 crore.
Impact
of the Fall |
| Petroleum imports will hurt, it will mean
a dip of Rs 3,874 crore in the Government's kitty. Power projects will be costlier and tariffs will go up for those already in
the pipeline.
Telecom projects will suffer as they are funded with offshore
loans.
Capital markets will be hit as bottom lines of foreign
investors will be affected. PSU disinvestment could be a non-starter.
Inflation will spiral. Consequently, the market expects
interest rates to rise by about 2 per cent in the medium term.
Fertiliser imports will be costlier, which will hit farmers. |
Juxtapose this with the external context: the second
coming of the Asian Contagion which only last month experts had predicted would soon die.
Since March 30, the Thai Baht has fallen 11.61 per cent, the Taiwanese dollar 6.19 per
cent, the Singapore dollar by 7.38 per cent and Malaysian Ringgit by 8.77 per cent. The
Japanese Yen slipped by a stunning 6.49 per cent vis-a-vis the dollar. And there was the
looming spectre of a depreciation of the Chinese Yuan.
Simply stated, the rupee had no place to hide and slid to Rs
42.44 last Tuesday. "It was long overdue," says Surjit Bhalla, economist and
member of the committee on capital account convertibility: "Unfortunately, we are
devaluing from a position of weakness, we should have done it from one of strength."
Equally unfortunate is that the weaknesses are many: cost of money, power, a depressed
primary market, demand depression and crippling infrastructure bottlenecks. The falling
rupee only adds to the woes (see box).
Harry Dhaul, chief of the Independent Power Producers'
Association of India, believes that there will be an all-round rise in the tariffs of all
projects in the pipeline. "Both fixed (capital equipment) and variable (fuel) costs
will rise. Every project will have to be revised and each revision will mean more time and
money." Those who have done their funding know this only too well. Telecom projects,
for instance, are funded through offshore loans. That being the case, as Ravi Shankar,
chief financial officer of BPL Telecom, points out, "it is safer to go in for rupee
financing."
It is accepted that for the Indian economy to grow,
additionality of resources is a must. Which means steady and growing inflow of foreign
investments. More important, the ability of Indian outfits to tap the global debt market
to fund projects. It is here that the rupee's fall acts as a critical two-pronged dampner:
it makes borrowing more expensive as interest rates rise to match risk and it makes
repayment that much more expensive.
Even those involved in the core sectors are at their wits
end. Corporate houses estimate that with the rupee tumbling, capital equipment and input
costs -- already hit by the customs hike -- will hurt further. Anand Mahindra, managing
director M&M, puts this fear in perspective. "The breach of the Rs 40 mark was
inevitable. But now this is one more uncertainty adding to the other uncertainties,"
he says. That goes for the agriculture sector as well. "The impact is quite
disturbing," admits Uttam Gupta of the Fertiliser Association of India. "Every
one rupee slide to dollar makes phosphatic fertilisers more expensive."
The pace of the rupee's slide is not conducive for foreign
direct investment either and the confidence of foreign investors is bound to go on.
"Take a look at the dollex (dollar denominated index) and you get the picture,"
says Shankar Sharma of First Global. "All investments have to be seen as
risk-adjusted."
However, there's an upside to this downside. In some ways, it
could be argued that the rupee's slide has achieved what was sorely missed in the budget:
an incentive to export. The upside is that with oil prices lazing at a record 25-year low,
the Government having saved close to $2 billion (Rs 8,400 crore) in petro-import costs, it
has a real opportunity to cash in by letting the currency slide. Depreciation hawks have
been campaigning with the Ministry of Finance for this as a weapon to increase the
country's market share (which currently is less than one per cent) in world trade. The
argument is that a booming export sector would bring in dollars, help industry get
inventories off the shelves, improve profits aiding revenue growth and spur the capital
market.
Easily said. But the downside of this upside is that a large
part of India's exports -- except for software, commodities and agro-products -- are
import intensive. Besides, there are also other increased input costs like that of
transport, communication and energy. India's pathetic infrastructure -- where ships take
over three weeks at times to turnaround compared to three days elsewhere -- is also an
impediment to exports growth. So a good price may get orders, but can delivery be assured?
Yet, there are some corporates which believe that a dearer
dollar will make them more competitive vis-a-vis imports and that a cheaper rupee will
lift exports to set the balance right. S. Vasan, treasury economist, Standard Chartered
Bank doesn't agree. "The lower rupee might not help exports. The fundamental factors
that have impeded export expansion in the past, structural or cyclical, have not
changed." What he implies is under the circumstances, it would be difficult to meet
the annual export growth target of 20 per cent year-on-year.
It is not that the Government is silent about it. Even as the
Reserve Bank of India (RBI) tried to stem the fall, Governor Bimal Jalan unveiled a new
package that was at the same time defensive and aggressive. On the one hand, the bank
sought to augment inflows by pushing through incentives for exporters including lower
interest loans on incremental exports and tried to block outflows by FIIs by affording
them a forex risk cover on incremental investments. At the same time, Jalan also tried to
assuage the fears of the market by outlining the strength of the currency vis-a-vis the
economy and stated that the policy initiative is an indication that "we are going to
handle the situation. Don't act on apprehensions and fears".
The fears persist though. As Vasan points out, "the
measures announced by the RBI are an indication that perhaps the rupee's adjustment is
more or less complete. But much of it is intention." Others feel that given the
external environment, there was little else that Jalan could have done.
Not quite that inevitable. Raghavendra Jha of the Indira
Gandhi Institute of Development Research says it is a question of knowing where the
currency should be pegged in the context of the trading basket. K.R. Bharat, managing
director, Credit Suisse First Boston, adds that it is also an issue of improving inflows.
The Government, he suggests, needs to urgently "speed up investments in
infrastructure, insurance, real estate and push privatisation in both domestic and
international markets. Or else the trend will be difficult to reverse." The writing,
thus, is yet again on the wall. The question is whether the Government is up to it. |